SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Federal Register 98-8191 (codified at 42 CFR §121), 1998:16, 296.
  • 2
    Ubel PA, Caplan AL. Geographic favoritism in liver transplantation—Unfortunate or unfair? N Engl J Med 1998; 339:13221325.MEDLINE
  • 3
    Committee on Organ Procurement and Transplantation Policy, Institute of Medicine. Organ Procurement and Transplantation. Assessing Current Policies and the Potential Impact of the DHHS Final Rule. Washington, DC: National Academy Press 1999.
  • 4
    Krakauer H. Assessing the performance of organ transplant programs: Liver and heart programs. Washington, DC: Office of Health Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services 1999.
  • 5
    Committee on Organ Procurement and Transplantation Policy, Institute of Medicine. Organ Procurement and Transplantation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999;66.
  • 6
    Lucey MR, Brown KA, Everson GT, Fung JJ, Gish R, Keeffe EB, et al. Minimal criteria for placement of adults on the liver transplant waiting list: A report of a national conference organized by the American Society of Transplant Physicians and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Liver Transpl Surg 1997; 3:628637.MEDLINE
  • 7
    Everhart JE, Lombardero M, Detre KM, Zetterman RK, Wiesner RH, Lake JR, Hufnagle JH. Increased waiting time for liver transplantation results in higher mortality. Transplantation 1997; 64:13001306.MEDLINE
  • 8
    Tuttle-Newhall JE, Rutledge R, Johnson M, Fair J. A statewide population-based, time series analysis of access to liver transplantation. Transplantation 1997; 63:255262.MEDLINE
  • 9
    Alexander GC, Sehgal AR. Barriers to cadaveric renal transplantation among blacks, women, and the poor. JAMA 1998; 280:11481152.MEDLINE
  • 10
    Keeffe EB. Assessment of the alcoholic patient for liver transplantation. Liver Transpl Surg 1996; 2:1220.MEDLINE
  • 11
    Committee on Organ Procurement and Transplantation Policy, Institute of Medicine. Organ Procurement and Transplantation. Assessing Current Policies and the Potential Impact of the DHHS Final Rule. Executive Summary. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999;11.
  • 12
    Edwards EB, Roberts JP, McBride MA, Schulak JA, Hunsicker LG. The effect of the volume of procedures at transplantation centers on mortality after liver transplantation. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:20492053.MEDLINE
  • 13
    Luskin RS, Buckley CA, Bradley JW, O'Connor KJ, Delmonico FL. An alternative approach to evaluating organ procurement organization performance. Transplant Proc 1999; 31:353355.MEDLINE
  • 14
    Committee on Organ Procurement and Transplantation Policy, Institute of Medicine. Organ Procurement and Transplantation. Assessing Current Policies and the Potential Impact of the DHHS Final Rule. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999;69, 72, 76.
  • 15
    Annual Report of the US Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network—Transplant Data: 1988–1997. Rockville, MD: UNOS, Richmond, VA, and the Division of Transplantation, Bureau of Health Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services. 1998;139.
  • 16
    Muto PA, Freeman RB, Haug CE, Lu A, Rohrer RJ. Liver transplant candidate stratification systems: Implications for third-party payors and organ allocation. Transplantation 1994; 57:306308.MEDLINE