Original Article
You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of the proposed UCSF criteria with the Milan criteria and the Pittsburgh modified TNM criteria
Article first published online: 30 DEC 2003
DOI: 10.1053/jlts.2002.34892
Copyright © 2002 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
Additional Information
How to Cite
Yao, F. Y., Ferrell, L., Bass, N. M., Bacchetti, P., Ascher, N. L. and Roberts, J. P. (2002), Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of the proposed UCSF criteria with the Milan criteria and the Pittsburgh modified TNM criteria. Liver Transpl, 8: 765–774. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2002.34892
Publication History
- Issue published online: 30 DEC 2003
- Article first published online: 30 DEC 2003
Funded by
- National Institutes of Health to the University of California, San Francisco Liver Center. Grant Number: P30DK26743
References
- 1, , , , , . Liver resection versus transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients. Ann Surg 1993; 218:145–151.
- 2, , , , , , et al. The role of transplantation in small hepatocellular carcinoma complicating cirrhosis of the liver. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 178:379–384.
- 3, , , , , , et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:693–699.
- 4, , , , , , et al. Survival after liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative study. Hepatology 1997; 25:1485–1489.
- 5, , , , , , et al. Liver transplantation for small hepatocellular carcinoma: The Tumor–Node–Metastasis classification does not have prognostic power. Hepatology 1998; 27:1572–1577.
- 6, , , , , , et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Expansion of the tumor size limits does not adversely impact survival. Hepatology 2001; 33:1394–1403.
- 7, , , , , , et al. Influence of tumor characteristics on the outcome of liver transplantation among patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl 2001; 7:631–636.
- 8, , , , , , et al. Liver transplantation for primary hepatocellular carcinoma: Tumor size and number determine outcome. J Hepatol 1993; 18:226–234.
- 9United Network for Organ Sharing. Available via the Internet: (http://www.unos.org). Accessed 10 December, 2001.
- 10International Union Against Cancer (UICC). TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 5th ed. In: LHSobin, ChWittekind (eds). New York, NY: Wiley-Liss, 1997:74–77.
- 11, , , . Is the pathologic TNM staging system for patients with hepatoma predictive of outcome? Cancer 2000; 88:538–543.
- 12, , , , . Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 1973; 60:646–649.
- 13, . Primary carcinoma of the liver: A study of 100 cases among 48,900 necropsies. Cancer 1954; 1:462–503.
- 14, . The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons, 1990:15.
- 15, , , , , , et al. Liver transplantation for small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: Analysis of our experience. Transplant Proc 2001; 33:1442–1444.
- 16, , . UNOS' policy in upgrading patients with HCC awaiting liver transplantation: Too little too late [abstract]. Transplantation 2000(suppl);69:S139.
- 17. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. A registry report of the impact of tumor characteristics on outcome. Ann Surg 1998; 228:479–490.
- 18, , , , , , et al. Results of orthotopic liver transplantation for liver cirrhosis in the presence of incidental and/or undetected hepatocellular carcinoma and tumour characteristics. Transpl Int 1998; 11(suppl):S197–200.
- 19, , , , , , et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in native livers from patients treated with orthotopic liver transplantation: Biologic and therapeutic implications. Hepatology 2001; 34:502–510.
- 20, , , , , , et al. Impact of histologic grade of hepatocellular carcinoma on the outcome of liver transplantation. Arch Surg 2001; 136:25–30.
- 21, , , , . Liver transplantation for malignant disease: Results in 93 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 1988; 207:373–379.
- 22, , , , , , et al. Clinicopathologic factors affecting patient survival and tumor recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Transplant Proc 1991; 23:2194–2196.
- 23, , , , , , et al. Vascular invasion and histologic grading determine outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. Hepatology 2001; 33:1080–1086.
- 24, , , . Needle-tract implantation from hepatocellular cancer: Is needle biopsy of the liver always necessary? Liver Transpl 2000; 6:67–72.
- 25, , , , , , et al. MELD and PELD: Application of survival models to liver allocation. Liver Transpl 2001; 7:567–580.
- 26, , , , , , et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma—A prospective analysis of survival according to intention-to-treat, and the rate of “drop-out” from the waiting list [abstract]. Hepatology 2001; 34:174A.
- 27, , , , , . Living donor liver transplantation for early hepatocellular carcinoma: A life-expectancy and cost-effectiveness perspective. Hepatology 2001; 33:1073–1079.
- 28, , , , . Living-donor versus cadaveric liver transplantation for non-resectable small hepatocellular carcinoma and compensated cirrhosis: A decision analysis. Transplantation 2001; 72:861–868.
- 29, . Prognostic prediction and treatment strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2002; 35:519–524.

1527-6473/asset/LT_left.gif?v=1&s=e1df7d33719b841a3479d2fd0a24baa5df4653e4)
1527-6473/asset/LT_right.gif?v=1&s=5deda9b4c4c603398e58a7274cf47e5b03ffc5fe)
1527-6473/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=8c6a04b26832399220fbb731e05bd8cc9ff13ae2)