SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Elizabeth S. Vieira, José A.S. Cabral, José A.N.F. Gomes, Definition of a model based on bibliometric indicators for assessing applicants to academic positions, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65, 3
  2. 2
    Elizabeth S. Vieira, José A.S. Cabral, José A.N.F. Gomes, How good is a model based on bibliometric indicators in predicting the final decisions made by peers?, Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8, 2, 390

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Malhar N. Kumar, Review of the Ethics and Etiquettes of Time Management of Manuscript Peer Review, Journal of Academic Ethics, 2014, 12, 4, 333

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Prometheus Assessed?, 2012,

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Herbert W. Marsh, Upali W. Jayasinghe, Nigel W. Bond, Gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications: A substantive-methodological synergy in support of the null hypothesis model, Journal of Informetrics, 2011, 5, 1, 167

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Lutz Bornmann, Scientific peer review, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2011, 45, 1
  7. 7
    David Coniam, Systematising System: One reviewer’s analysis of the review process, System, 2011, 39, 4, 539

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Michal Jasienski, Garfield’s demon and “surprising” or “unexpected” results in science, Scientometrics, 2009, 78, 2, 347

    CrossRef