SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Azzi, A. 1993a. Group representation and procedural justice in multigroup decision-making bodies. Social Justice Research, 6: 195217.
  • Azzi, A. 1993b. Implicit and category-based allocations of decision-making power in majority-minority relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29: 203228.
  • Barren-Howard, E. and Tyler, T. R. 1986. Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions. Journal of Personality und Social Psychology, 511: 296304.
  • Bierbrauer, G. Political ideology and allocution preferences: What do Turkish immigrants in Germany deserve?. International Network for Social Justice Research Conference. Potsdam, Germany. July.
  • Bies, R. J., Martin, C. L. and Brockner, J. 1993. Just laid off. but still a “good citizen:” Only if the process is fair. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6: 227248.
  • Casper, J. D., Tyler, T. R. and Fisher, B. 1988. Procedural justice in felony cases. Law und Society Review, 22: 483507.
  • Ebreo, A., Linn, N. and Vining, J. 1996. The impact of procedural justice on opinions of public policy: Solid waste management as an example. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26: 12591285.
  • Fiske, A. P. 1992. The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99: 689723.
  • Folger, R. and Konovsky, M. A. 1989. Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 115130.
  • Fondacaro, M. and Dunkle, M. E. 1998. Procedural justice in resolving family disputes Unpublished manuscript
  • Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A. and Rust, M. C. 1993. The common ingroup identity model. European Review of Social Psychology, 4: 126.
  • Green, O. P. and Shapiro, I. 1994. Pathologies of rational choice theory, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Heinz, A. M. and Kerstetter, W. A. 1979. Pretrial settlement conference: Evaluation of a reform in plea bargaining. Law and Society Review, 13: 349366.
  • Houlden, P. 1980. The impact of procedural modifications on evaluations of plea bargaining. Law and Society Review, 15: 267292.
  • HUO, Y. J., Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R. and Lind, E. A. 1996. Super-ordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem, is assimilation the answer. Psychological Science, 7: 4045.
    Direct Link:
  • HUO, Y. J. and Tyler, T. R.Ethnic diversity and the viability of organizations: The role of procedural justice in bridging differences”. In Advances in organisational justice, Edited by: Greenberg, J. and Cropanzano, R. San Francisco, CA: New Lexington Press. in press
  • Kim, W. C. and Mauborgne, R. A. 1991. Implementing global strategies: The role of procedural justice. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 125143.
  • Kim, W. C. and Mauborgne, R. A. 1993. Procedural justice, attitudes, and subsidiary top management compliance with multinationals' corporate strategic decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 502526.
  • Kitzman, K. M. and Emery, R. E. 1993. Procedural justice and parents' satisfaction in a field study of child custody dispute resolution. Law and Human Behavior, 17: 553567.
  • Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M. and Sapienza, H. J. 1995. Buildingcommitment. attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 6084.
  • Lind, E. X., Greenberg, J., Scott, K. S. and Welchans, T. D. 1998. The winding road from employee to complaint: Situational and psychological determinants of wrongful termination claims, San Diego, CA: Academy of Management.
  • Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R. and Earley, P. C. 1990. Voice, control, and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59: 952959.
  • Lind, E. A., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M. and de Vera Park, M. 1993. Individual and corporate dispute resolution. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 224251.
  • Lind, E. A., MacCoun, R. J., Ebener, P. A., Felstiner, W. L. F., Hensler, D. R., Resnik, J. and Tyler, T. R. 1989. The perception of justice: Tort litigants' views of trial, court-annexed arbitration, and judicial settlement conferences, Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
  • Lind, E. A. and Tyler, T. R. 1988. The social psychology of procedural justice, New York: Plenum Press.
  • Lissak, R. I. and Sheppard, B. H. 1983. Beyond fairness: The criterion problem in research on dispute resolution. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13: 4565.
  • MacCoun, R. J., Lind, E. A., Hensler, D. R., Bryant, D. L. and Ebener, P. A. 1988. Alternative adjudication: An evaluation of the New Jersey automobile arbitration program, Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
  • McEwen, C. and Mai man, R. J. 1984. Mediation in small claims court. Law and Society Review., 18: 1149.
  • McFarlin, D. B. and Sweeney, P. D. 1992. Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 626637.
  • Messick, D. M., Bloom, S., Boldizar, J. P. and Samuelson, C. D. 1985. Why we are fairer than others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21: 389399.
  • Mikula, G., Petri, B. and Tanzer, N. 1990. What people regard as unjust: Types and structures of everyday experiences of injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22: 133149.
  • Montada, L. 1995. Applying social psychology: The case of redistributions in unified Germany. Social Justice Research, 8: 7390.
  • Montada, L. and Schneider, A. 1989. Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvdiitaged. Social Justice Research, 3: 313344.
  • Moorman, R. H. 1991. Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviours: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 845855.
  • Moorman, R. H., Niehoff, B. P. and Organ, D. W. 1993. Treating employees fairly and organizational citizenship behaviour. Employee Resptmsihilities and Riglits Journal, 6: 209225.
  • Niehoff, B. P. and Moorman, R. H. 1993. Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behaviour. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 527556.
  • Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Bachman, R. and Sherman, L. W. 1997. Do fair procedures matter?: The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law and Society Review, 31: 163204.
  • Peterson, R. 1994. The role of values in predicting fairness judgements and support of affirmative action. Journal of Social Issues, 50: 95116.
  • Pfeffer, J. 1994. Competitive advantage through people, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Pruitt, D. G., Peirce, R. S., McGillicuddy, N. B., Welton, G. L. and Castrianno, L. M. 1993. Long-term success in mediation. Law and Human Behavior, 17: 313330.
  • Pruitt, D. G., Peirce, R. S., Zubek, J. M., Welton, G. L. and Nochajski, TH. 1990. Goal achievement, procedural justice, and the success of mediation. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 1: 3345.
  • Schaubroeck, J., May, D. R. and Brown, F. 1994. Procedural justice explanations and employee reactions to economic hardship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: 455460.
  • Shapiro, D. and Brett, J. 1993. Comparing three processes underlying judgements of procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65: 11671177.
  • Sheppard, B. H. and Lewicki, R. J. 1987. Toward general principles of managerial fairness. Social Justice Research, 1: 161176.
  • Smith, H. J. and Tyler, T. R. 1996. Justice and power. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26: 171200.
  • Smith, H. J. and Tyler, T. R. 1997. Choosing the right pond: The influence of the status of one's group and one's status in that group on self-esteem and group-oriented behaviours. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33: 146170.
  • Sondag, H. and Sheppard, B. August 1995. Evaluating alternative models for allocating scarce resources: A relational approach to procedural justice and social structure, August, Vancouver: Academy of Management.
  • Sparks, R., Bottoms, A. and Hay, W. 1996. Prisons and the problem of order, Oxford: Clarendon.
  • Taylor, M. S., Tracy, K. B., Renard, M. K., Harrison, J. K. and Carroll, S. J. 1995. Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 495523.
  • Thibaut, J. and Walker, L. 1975. Procedural justice, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
  • Tyler, T. R. 1987. Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgements of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52: 333344.
  • Tyler, T. R. 1988. What is proceduraljustice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law and Society Review, 22: 301355.
  • Tyler, T. R. 1990. Why people obey the law, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Tyler, T. R. 1994. Governing amid diversity: The effect of fair decision-making procedures on the legitimacy of government. Law and Society Review, 28: 809831.
  • Tyler, T. R. 1997a. The psychology of legitimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1: 323345.
  • Tyler, T. R. 1997b. Citizen discontent with legal procedures: A social science perspective on civil procedure reform. American Journal of Comparative Law, 45: 871904.
  • Tyler, T. R. 1999. Why people cooperate in organizations: An identity-based perspective. Research in Orgnizational Behavior, 21: 201246.
  • Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R., Smith, H. J. and Hou, Y. J. 1997. Social justice in a diverse society, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Tyler, T. R. and Degpey, P. 1995. Collective restraint in a social dilemma situation: The influence of procedural justice and community identification on the empowerment and legitimacy of authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69: 482497.
  • Tyler, T. R. and Lind, E. A. 1992. “A relational model of authority in groups”. In Advances in experimental social psychology, Edited by: Zanna, M. Vol. 25, 151191. New York: Academic Press.
  • Tyler, T. R., Lind, E. A., Ohbuchi, K., Sugawara, I. and Huo, Y. J. 1998. Conflict with outsiders: Disputing within and across cultural boundaries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24: 137146.
  • Tyler, T. R. and Mitchell, G. 1994. Legitimacy and the empowerment of discretionary legal authority: The United States Supreme Court and abortion rights. Duke Law Journal, 43: 703814.
  • Tyler, T. R. and Smith, H. J. 1997. “Social justice and social movements”. In Handbook of social psychology, 4th ed. Edited by: Gilbert, D., Fiske, S. and Lindzey, G. Vol. 2, 595629.
  • Wissler, R. L. 1995. Mediation and adjudication in small claims court. Law and Society Review, 29: 323358.