Supported by grants from the Joint Committee North Medical Care Region, the County Council of Norrbotten, Umeå University, the Swedish Medical Research Council (#K99-73X-06578-17B), and the Foundation of Acta Oto-Laryngologica.
Variability of Eustachian Tube Function: Comparison of Ears With Retraction Disease and Normal Middle Ears †
Article first published online: 2 JAN 2009
Copyright © 2000 The Triological Society
Volume 110, Issue 8, pages 1389–1395, August 2000
How to Cite
Bunne, M., Falk, B., Magnuson, B. and Hellström, S. (2000), Variability of Eustachian Tube Function: Comparison of Ears With Retraction Disease and Normal Middle Ears . The Laryngoscope, 110: 1389–1395. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200008000-00032
- Issue published online: 2 JAN 2009
- Article first published online: 2 JAN 2009
- Manuscript Accepted: 27 APR 2000
- Eustachian tube function;
- tympanic membrane retraction;
- function tests;
- prognostic value.
Objective To explore the short-term and long-term variability of tubal opening and closing in ears with advanced retractions and in healthy ears.
Study Design/Methods Twenty ears with retraction type middle ear disease (R-MED) and 20 normal ears underwent direct recording of the middle ear pressure during repeated forced openings, equalization of +100 daPa and −100 daPa by swallowing, Valsalva inflation, and forceful sniffing. Tests were performed twice (separated by 30 min) on each of 2 days separated by 3 to 4 months.
Results There was considerable intraindividual variability of the forced opening pressure and the closing pressure in both groups, within as well as between sessions and test days. Although the variability was 1.5 to 2 times higher in ears with retraction than in the normal group, mean Po and Pc did not differ between the groups. Compared with normal ears, ears with retraction changed more frequently from a positive to negative test response, or vice versa, when re-tested after 30 minutes. Rates of positive response in the equalization and Valsalva tests were significantly lower in diseased ears compared with normal ears.
Conclusions Eustachian tube opening and closing functions vary more in ears with retraction disease than in normal ears, which is consistent with the variable clinical course of R-MED and implies that single tubal function tests have little prognostic value on the individual level.