Get access

Electromyographic Findings After Different Selective Neck Dissections

Authors

  • Tetsuya Tsuji MD, PhD,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
    • Dr. Tetsuya Tsuji, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Akira Tanuma MD,

    1. Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital and Research Institute, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Tetsuro Onitsuka MD,

    1. Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital and Research Institute, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Mitsuru Ebihara MD,

    1. Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital and Research Institute, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Yoshiyuki Iida MD,

    1. Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital and Research Institute, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Akio Kimura MD, PhD,

    1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Keio University Tsukigase Rehabilitation Center, Izu city, Shizuoka, Japan.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Meigen Liu MD, PhD

    1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Objectives: The objective was to compare electrophysiologic investigations of the upper trapezius muscle (UT) after different selective neck dissections (SND) and analyze the differences between types of SND and the preservation and excision of the cervical nerves (the C2–4 rami of the cervical plexus).

Study Design: Retrospective study of 54 patients (average age, 65.1 ± 9.6 yr, 45 males) with 70 SND.

Methods: Patients underwent needle electromyography (EMG) of the UT by 4 months after surgery. The findings were rated according to the 5 point EMG scale system from 1 (total denervation: positive sharp wave or fibrillation potential at rest and electrical silence at voluntary contraction) to 5 (normal pattern).

Results: The average EMG scale was 1.7 ± 1.1, 58.6% for score 1 and only 5.7% for score 5. There was not a significant difference in the EMG scale between the types of SND, whereas the group in which the cervical nerves were excised was significantly lower than in that in which it was preserved. The average EMG scales in the former and latter were 1.5 ± 0.8 and 2.0 ± 1.3, 68.8%.

Conclusions: The study data confirm that complete or incomplete denervation of the UT was caused by axonal injury of the spinal accessory nerve, even though it was spared, because of traction of the nerve during neck dissection. Second, the excision of the C2 to 4 rami of the cervical plexus caused worse damage of the UT. It is suggested that it is important to preserve the cervical nerves to avoid denervation of the UT.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary