Presented at the Triological Society Southern Section Meeting, Naples, Florida, U.S.A., January 11, 2008. Editor's Note: This Manuscript was accepted for publication February 15, 2008.
The Effect of Occult Nodal Metastases on Survival and Regional Control in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma†
Article first published online: 2 JAN 2009
Copyright © 2008 The Triological Society
Volume 118, Issue 7, pages 1191–1194, July 2008
How to Cite
Gourin, C. G., Conger, B. T., Porubsky, E. S., Sheils, W. C., Bilodeau, P. A. and Coleman, T. A. (2008), The Effect of Occult Nodal Metastases on Survival and Regional Control in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. The Laryngoscope, 118: 1191–1194. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31816e2eb7
- Issue published online: 2 JAN 2009
- Article first published online: 2 JAN 2009
- Cervical nodes;
- squamous cell cancer;
- head and neck neoplasms;
- extracapsular spread;
Objectives: To determine factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) and regional control in clinically node-negative head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) patients with occult metastasis.
Study Design: Non-randomized retrospective analysis.
Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent elective neck dissection (END) from 1985 to 2002 were analyzed.
Results: A total of 337 patients underwent END. The majority of patients (67%) had advanced stage disease (T3/T4). Occult metastases were present (pN+) in 168 patients (50%), with extracapsular spread (ECS) present in 72 patients (43%). Five-year DFS for patients with histologically node negative necks was 62% versus 36% for pN+ patients (P < .0001). Postoperative radiation (XRT) did not significantly influence DFS for pN+ patients with less than three nodes involved, but had a significant association with DFS with three or more nodes involved (P < .0001). XRT showed a trend toward improved regional control rates in patients with less than three positive nodes (86% vs. 78%; P = .7579) and patients with three or more positive nodes (62% vs. 50%; P = .0014). When ECS was present, XRT did not affect DFS in patients with less than three nodes (36%), but had a significant effect on DFS in patients with three or more nodes (20% vs. 0%; P = .0075). Regional control rates were not improved with XRT in ECS-positive patients with less than three nodes (62% vs. 75%) or with three or more nodes involved (43% vs. 50%; P = .0678).
Conclusions: There is a high incidence of occult metastases in clinically node-negative patients which adversely affects survival, regardless of the use of adjuvant XRT. Postoperative XRT did not significantly affect regional control or survival rates in patients with <3 positive nodes. When ECS was present, survival was poor regardless of the number of nodes. These data emphasize the prognostic and therapeutic role of END and highlight the need for the development of novel therapeutic regimens to improve disease control and survival in HNSCC patients with nodal metastases.