Adult Subglottic Stenosis: Management With Laser Incisions and Mitomycin-C

Authors

  • Frederick C. Roediger MD,

    1. From the Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Lisa A. Orloff MD,

    1. From the Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Mark S. Courey MD

    Corresponding author
    1. From the Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
    • Send correspondence to Mark S. Courey, MD, Division of Laryngology, UCSF Voice and Swallowing Center, 2330 Post Street, 5th Floor, Box 1809, San Francisco, CA 94115
    Search for more papers by this author

  • Editor's Note: This Manuscript was accepted for publication April 4, 2008. Presented at Western Section Meeting, Triological Society, Rancho Mirage, California, U.S.A., January 31–February 2, 2008.

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: To assess the efficacy of endoscopic laser radial incisions with mitomycin-C application (ELRM) in managing adult subglottic stenosis (SGS).

Study Design: Retrospective case series review.

Methods: Fifteen consecutive cases of adult SGS treated with ELRM at a single tertiary referral center over three years were reviewed. Subjects with SGS secondary to Wegener's granulomatosis (WG) and idiopathic SGS were included. Patients with cartilaginous SGS were excluded. The primary outcome measure was postoperative reduction in symptoms. Secondary outcome measures included total number of procedures required to relieve symptoms, interval between procedures, and improvement in pulmonary function tests when available. In addition to surgery, 14 of 15 patients were treated medically for reflux.

Results: Ten women and five men with average age 48 years were identified. Ten patients had idiopathic SGS and five had WG. The predominant presenting symptom was dyspnea on exertion in all patients. All subjects reported at least a temporary postoperative reduction in symptoms. Six patients (40%) required only one ELRM and nine patients (60%) required repeat ELRM at an average interval of 9 months. The average interval for the six patients with idiopathic etiology requiring a second procedure was 9 months. One subject with WG required four procedures. His interval improved from 2.5 to 7 months between procedures. Evidence of extrathoracic airway obstruction resolved in three of four patients with pre and postoperative pulmonary function tests.

Conclusions: ELRM is an effective method of managing SGS associated with idiopathic causes. In patients with WG, ELRM reduced airway associated symptoms and avoided need for tracheotomy.

Ancillary