• Altona, C. and Sundaralingam, M. 1972. Conformational analysis of the sugar ring in nucleosides and nucleotides. A new description using the concept of pseudorotation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 94: 82058212.
  • Berman, H.M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G., Bhat, T.N., Weissig, H., Shindyalov, I.N., and Bourne, P.E. 2000. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28: 235242.
  • Bhattacharyya, R. and Chakrabarti, P. 2003. Stereospecific interactions of pro-line residues in protein structures and complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 311: 925940.
  • Bricard, R.J. 1897. Mémoire sur la théorie de l'octaèdre articulé. J. Math. Pures. Appl. 3: 113150.
  • Chakrabarti, P. and Pal, D. 2001. The interrelationships of side-chain and main-chain conformations in proteins. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 76: 1102.
  • Coutsias, E.A., Seok, C., Jacobson, M.P., and Dill, K.A. 2004. A kinematic view of loop closure. J. Comput. Chem. 25: 510528.
  • DeTar, D.F. and Luthra, N.P. 1977. Conformations of proline. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99: 12321244.
  • EU 3-D Validation Network. 1998. Who checks the checkers? Four validation tools applied to eight atomic resolution structures. J. Mol. Biol. 276: 417436.
  • Ho, B.K., Thomas, A., and Brasseur, R. 2003. Revisiting the Ramachandran plot: Hard-sphere repulsion, electrostatics, and H-bonding in the α-helix. Protein Sci. 12: 25082522.
  • Lovell, S.C., Davis, I.W., Arendall, W.B. III, de Bakker, P.I., Word, J.M., Prisant, M.G., Richardson, J.S., and Richardson, D.C. 2003. Structure validation by Cα geometry: ϕ,ψ and Cβ deviation. Proteins 50: 437450.
  • MacArthur, M.W. and Thornton, J.M. 1991. Influence of proline residues on protein conformation. J. Mol. Biol. 218: 397412.
  • Mackerell, A.D. Jr., Bashford, D., Bellott, M., Dunbrack, R.L. Jr., Evanseck, J.D., Field, M.J., Fischer, S., Gao, J., Guo, H., Ha, S., et al. 1998. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B102: 35863616.
  • Milner-White, E.J. 1990. Situations of γ-turns in proteins: Their relation to α-helices, β-sheets and ligand binding sites. J. Mol. Biol. 216: 386397.
  • Némethy, G., Gibson, K.D., Palmer, K.A., Yoon, C.N., Paterlini, G., Zagari, A., Rumsey, S., and Scheraga, H.A. 1992. Energy parameters in polypeptides, 10: Improved geometrical parameters and nonbonded interactions for use in the ECEPP/3 algorithm, with application to proline-containing peptides. J. Phys. Chem. 96: 64726484.
  • Pal, D. and Chakrabarti, P. 1999. Cis peptide bonds in proteins: Residues involved, their conformations, interactions and locations. J. Mol. Biol. 294: 271288.
  • Ramachandran, G.N., Lakshminarayanan, A.V., Balasubramanian, R., and Tegoni, G. 1970. Studies on the conformation of amino acids, XII: Energy calculations on propyl residue. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 221: 165181.
  • Schimmel, P.R. and Flory, P.J. 1968. Conformational energies and configurational statistics of copolypeptides containing L-proline. J. Mol. Biol. 34: 105120.
  • Summers, L.N. and Karplus, M. 1990. Modeling of globular proteins: A distance-based data search procedure for the construction of insertion/deletion regions and Pro-non-Pro mutations. J. Mol. Biol. 216: 9911016.