The Unimaginable
Article first published online: 17 DEC 2002
DOI: 10.1111/0018-2656.711998071
1998 by Wesleyan University
Additional Information
How to Cite
Steinbrenner, J. (1998), The Unimaginable. History and Theory, 37: 115–126. doi: 10.1111/0018-2656.711998071
Publication History
- Issue published online: 17 DEC 2002
- Article first published online: 17 DEC 2002
- Abstract
- Cited By
Arthur Danto advocates the thesis that we cannot imagine the art or artwork of the future. This thesis is motivated primarily by his Hegelian conception of history and secondarily by his holistic conception of art, which is informed by Wittgenstein. At first glance the thesis seems to conflict with Danto's second thesis that anything (any object) can be a work of art. Danto's solution to this problem is not very convincing. A more promising approach can be found in Kant's aesthetics and especially in his concept of genius.

1468-2303/asset/HITH_centre.gif?v=1&s=1dbd4b55667923b89d14e7cf1c0647722e87b515)
1468-2303/asset/HITH_right.gif?v=1&s=790f8346dd02269cc464f390302425d8aa4329ea)
1468-2303/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=139703528552333fa5405dbdd41506d13b6aa23c)