Subordinate removal affects parental investment, but not offspring survival in a cooperative cichlid
Version of Record online: 2 APR 2013
© 2013 The Authors. Functional Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society
Special Issue: Plant–Microbe–Insect Interactions
Volume 27, Issue 3, pages 730–738, June 2013
How to Cite
Bruintjes, R., Heg-Bachar, Z., Heg, D. (2013), Subordinate removal affects parental investment, but not offspring survival in a cooperative cichlid. Functional Ecology, 27: 730–738. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12088
- Issue online: 23 MAY 2013
- Version of Record online: 2 APR 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 5 FEB 2013
- Manuscript Received: 29 MAY 2012
Fig. S1. The dominant pairs' summed difference in behaviour per 15 min between day 7 and day 0 in the removal treatment (day 7 after removal minus pre-removal data) for groups with a new large subordinate recruit (LS; n = 5) and for those without (n = 9).
Table S1. Results of GLMMs for time spent in the territory, frequency of breeding shelter visits and defence rates of the pre-removal observation.
Table S2. Summed behaviours of dominants pairs from the control and removal treatment with and without a new large subordinate (LS) recruit at day 7.
Table S3. Results of GLMs for time spent in the territory, frequency of breeding shelter visits and defence rates in removal treatment groups with and without new large subordinate recruits.
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.