Body mass dependent use of hibernation: why not prolong the active season, if they can?
Article first published online: 15 OCT 2013
© 2013 The Authors. Functional Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Special Issue: Climate change and species range shifts
Volume 28, Issue 1, pages 167–177, February 2014
How to Cite
Bieber, C., Lebl, K., Stalder, G., Geiser, F., Ruf, T. (2014), Body mass dependent use of hibernation: why not prolong the active season, if they can?. Functional Ecology, 28: 167–177. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12173
- Issue published online: 23 JAN 2014
- Article first published online: 15 OCT 2013
- Accepted manuscript online: 21 AUG 2013 08:56AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 6 AUG 2013
- Manuscript Received: 25 FEB 2013
- province of lower Austria, the city of Vienna
- Austrian Science Fund. Grant Numbers: 20534, 25023
- body fat reserves;
- edible dormouse;
- life-history strategy;
- Hibernation is the most effective means for energy conservation during winter in mammals. The drawbacks of deep and prolonged torpor include reduced immunocompetence, and consequently, hibernators should be selected to minimize torpor expression when climatic conditions or energy availability (e.g. food or fat stores) permit. Therefore, it seems surprising that some hibernators employ extraordinary long hibernation seasons, lasting well beyond periods with unfavourable conditions.
- Because of their extended use of torpor, edible dormice (Glis glis) provide an ideal model for scrutinizing interactions between energy reserves (i.e. body fat stores) and thermoregulatory patterns. We used a multimodel inference approach to analyse body temperature data (i.e. use of torpor) from 42 entire hibernation seasons over 4 years in females in relation to body mass.
- Body mass prior to hibernation did not affect the duration of the hibernation season, but animals hibernated for c. 8 months, that is, 2 months longer than required by environmental conditions. Fatter individuals aroused significantly more often, had a higher mean minimum body temperature during torpor and remained euthermic for longer periods than leaner animals.
- Surplus energy was therefore not used to shorten the hibernation season, but to rewarm more frequently, and to allow shallower torpor bouts. These adjustments apparently serve to avoid negative effects of torpor and, perhaps equally importantly, to minimize the time active above-ground. We argue that maintaining a short active season, despite surplus energy reserves, may be explained by known beneficial effects of hibernation on survival rates (via predator avoidance).
- Our data provide quantitative evidence that hibernation is a flexible tool within life-history strategies. We conclude that, apart from energetic necessities due to harsh environmental conditions, predator avoidance may be an important factor influencing patterns of hibernation and torpor in mammals. Thus, our study indicates that climatic conditions alone are not a good predictor of hibernation patterns or survival in hibernating species during global climate change.