SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alonso, J.C., Alonso, J.A., Bautista, L.M. & Muñoz-Pulido, R. (1995) Patch use in cranes: a field test of optimal foraging predictions. Animal Behaviour, 49, 13671379.
  • Altmann, J. (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour, 49, 227267.
  • Amano, T., Ushiyama, K., Moriguchi, S., Fujita, G., Higuchi, H., Mano, T.A.A., Shiyama, K.A.U., Origuchi, S.A.M. & Ujita, G.O.F. (2006) Decision-making in group foragers with incomplete information: test of individual-based model in geese. Ecological Monographs, 76, 601616.
  • Bates, D., Maechler, M. & Bolker, B. (2011) lme4: Linear Mixed-effects Models Using S4 Classes. R Package Version 0.999375-39. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
  • Beauchamp, G. (2000) Learning rules for social foragers: implications for the producer-scrounger game and ideal free distribution theory. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 207, 2135.
  • Biernaskie, J.M., Walker, S.C. & Gegear, R.J. (2009) Bumblebees learn to forage like Bayesians. The American Naturalist, 174, 413423.
  • Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer, New York.
  • Bye Design Ltd. (1999) SpreadCE version 2.03. Available at: www.byedesign.co.uk
  • Charnov, E.L. (1976) Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology, 9, 129136.
  • Cowlishaw, G. (1994) Vulnerability to predation in baboon populations. Behaviour, 131, 293304.
  • Cowlishaw, G. & Davies, J. (1997) Flora of the Pro-Namib Desert Swakop River catchment, Namibia: community classification and implications for desert vegetation sampling. Journal of Arid Environments, 36, 271290.
  • Dall, S.R.X., Giraldeau, L.A., Olsson, O., McNamara, J.M. & Stephens, D.W. (2005) Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20, 187193.
  • Danchin, É., Giraldeau, L.-A., Valone, T.J. & Wagner, R.H. (2004) Public information: from nosy neighbors to cultural evolution. Science, 305, 487491.
  • Devenport, L.D. & Devenport, J.A. (1994) Time-dependent averaging of foraging information in least chipmunks and golden-mantled ground squirrels. Animal Behaviour, 47, 787802.
  • Eliassen, S., Jørgensen, C., Mangel, M. & Giske, J. (2009) Quantifying the adaptive value of learning in foraging behavior. The American Naturalist, 174, 478489.
  • Elston, D.A., Moss, R., Boulinier, T., Arrowsmith, C. & Lambin, X. (2001) Analysis of aggregation, a worked example: numbers of ticks on red grouse chicks. Parasitology, 122, 563569.
  • Evans, M.R. (2012) Modelling ecological systems in a changing world. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367, 181190.
  • Fawcett, T., Hamblin, S. & Giraldeau, L.-A. (2013) Exposing the behavioral gambit: the evolution of learning and decision rules. Behavioral Ecology, 24, 211.
  • Fortin, D. (2002) Optimal searching behaviour: the value of sampling information. Ecological Modelling, 153, 279290.
  • Fruteau, C., Voelkl, B., van Damme, E. & Noë, R. (2009) Supply and demand determine the market value of food providers in wild vervet monkeys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 1200712012.
  • van Gils, J.A., Schenk, I.W., Bos, O. & Piersma, T. (2003) Incompletely informed shorebirds that face a digestive constraint maximize net energy gain when exploiting patches. The American Naturalist, 161, 777793.
  • Giraldeau, L.-A. & Caraco, T. (2000) Social Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
  • Green, R.F. (1984) Stopping rules for optimal foragers. The American Naturalist, 123, 3043.
  • Groß, R., Houston, A.I., Collins, E.J., McNamara, J.M., Dechaume-Moncharmont, F.-X. & Franks, N.R. (2008) Simple learning rules to cope with changing environments. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 5, 11931202.
  • Hamblin, S. & Giraldeau, L.-A. (2009) Finding the evolutionarily stable learning rule for frequency-dependent foraging. Animal Behaviour, 78, 13431350.
  • Holmgren, N.M.A. & Olsson, O. (2000) A three-neoron model of information processing during Bayesian foraging. Perspectives in Neural Computing: Artificial neural networks in medicine and biology. Proceedings of the ANIMAB-1 Conference, Göteborg, Sweden, May 13-16, 2000. (eds H. Malmgren, M. Borga & L. Niklasson), pp. 265270. Springer, London.
  • Huchard, E., Alvergne, A., Féjan, D., Knapp, L.A., Cowlishaw, G. & Raymond, M. (2010) More than friends? Behavioural and genetic aspects of heterosexual associations in wild chacma baboons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 64, 769781.
  • Iwasa, Y., Higashi, M. & Yamamura, N. (1981) Prey distribution as a factor determining the choice of optimal foraging strategy. The American Naturalist, 117, 710723.
  • Kacelnik, A. & Krebs, J.R. (1985) Learning to exploit patchily distributed food. Behavioural Ecology: Ecological Consequences of Adaptive Behaviour. (eds R.M. Sibly & R.H. Smith), pp. 189206. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
  • Koops, M.A. & Abrahams, M.V. (2003) Integrating the roles of information and competitive ability on the spatial distribution of social foragers. The American Naturalist, 161, 586600.
  • Lima, S. (1984) Downy woodpecker foraging behavior: efficient sampling in simple stochastic environments. Ecology, 65, 166174.
  • Marshall, H.H., Carter, A.J., Coulson, T., Rowcliffe, J.M. & Cowlishaw, G. (2012) Exploring foraging decisions in a social primate using discrete-choice models. The American Naturalist, 180, 481495.
  • McNamara, J.M., Green, R.F. & Olsson, O. (2006) Bayes’ theorem and its applications in animal behaviour. Oikos, 112, 243251.
  • Noldus Information Technology. (2003) Matman Version 1.1.4. Noldus Information Technology, Wageningen.
  • Nolet, B.A., Klaassen, R.H.G. & Mooij, W.M. (2006) The use of a flexible patch leaving rule under exploitative competition: a field test with swans. Oikos, 112, 342352.
  • Nonacs, P. (2001) State dependent behavior and the marginal value theorem. Behavioral Ecology, 12, 7183.
  • Oaten, A. (1977) Optimal foraging in patches: a case for stochsticity. Theoretical Population Biology, 12, 263285.
  • Olsson, O. & Brown, J. (2006) The foraging benefits of information and the penalty of ignorance. Oikos, 112, 260273.
  • Olsson, O. & Holmgren, N.M.A. (1998) The survival-rate-maximizing policy for Bayesian foragers: wait for good news. Behavioral Ecology, 9, 345353.
  • R Development Core Team (2011) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
  • Rodriguez-Gironés, M. & Vásquez, R. (1997) Density-dependent patch exploitation and acquisition of environmental information. Theoretical Population Biology, 52, 3242.
  • Stephens, D.W., Brown, J.S. & Ydenberg, R.C. (eds.) (2007) Foraging: Behavior and Ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Stephens, D.W. & Krebs, J.R. (1986) Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
  • Symonds, M.R.E. & Moussalli, A. (2011) A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike's information criterion. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65, 1321.
  • Templeton, J.J. & Giraldeau, L.-A. (1995) Patch assessment in foraging flocks of European starlings: evidence for the use of public information. Behavioral Ecology, 6, 6572.
  • Valone, T.J. (1991) Bayesian and prescient assessment: foraging with pre-harvest information. Animal Behaviour, 41, 569577.
  • Valone, T.J. (1992) Information for patch assessment: a field investigation with black-chinned hummingbirds. Behavioral Ecology, 3, 211222.
  • Valone, T.J. (2006) Are animals capable of Bayesian updating? An empirical review. Oikos, 112, 252259.
  • Valone, T. & Brown, J.S. (1989) Measuring patch assessment abilities of desert granivores. Ecology, 70, 18001810.
  • Vásquez, R.A., Grossi, B. & Marquez, I.N. (2006) On the value of information: studying changes in patch assessment abilities through learning. Oikos, 112, 298310.
  • Wang, J. (2007) Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness. Genetical Research, 89, 135153.
  • Webster, M.M. & Laland, K.N. (2008) Social learning strategies and predation risk: minnows copy only when using private information would be costly. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275, 28692876.
  • Webster, M.M. & Laland, K.N. (2011) Reproductive state affects reliance on public information in sticklebacks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 619627.