Gauging recovery of zooplankton from historical acid and metal contamination: the influence of temporal changes in restoration targets
Article first published online: 3 DEC 2012
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology © 2012 British Ecological Society
Journal of Applied Ecology
Volume 50, Issue 1, pages 107–118, February 2013
How to Cite
Palmer, M. E., Keller, W., Yan, N. D. (2013), Gauging recovery of zooplankton from historical acid and metal contamination: the influence of temporal changes in restoration targets. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50: 107–118. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12007
- Issue published online: 30 JAN 2013
- Article first published online: 3 DEC 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 15 OCT 2012
- Manuscript Received: 28 APR 2012
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Ontario Graduate scholarships
- adaptive management;
- multiple stressors;
- normal range of variability;
- reference condition approach;
- restoration ecology;
- shifting/sliding baselines;
- species richness;
- water quality
Clearly defined restoration targets are necessary to judge the effectiveness of management actions in restoring damaged ecosystems. However, the identification of appropriate targets is difficult in a rapidly changing world. Historical reference conditions commonly provide recovery targets, but they may not be appropriate if present-day environments have shifted in response to regional or global drivers. Such shifts may need to be incorporated into restoration targets to avoid erroneous conclusions about the recovery of ecosystems damaged by localized stressors. No previous study has examined whether the selection of historical vs. present-day reference conditions alters judgments of the recovery of historically damaged ecosystems.
We examined 35-year trends in the zooplankton communities of four lakes polluted by smelter emissions in Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. Recovery was assessed by comparing the Sudbury lakes to both historical (1983–1984) and present-day (2004–2006) conditions in a set of minimally impacted reference lakes in south-central Ontario.
Sudbury zooplankton communities improved substantially over time when compared with both the historical and present-day recovery targets. However, recovery occurred later, and improvements differed quantitatively when judged against the present-day vs. historical targets. These differences were attributable to regional shifts in zooplankton communities that happened after the historical sampling period but were reflected in the present-day data.
Species richness in two Sudbury lakes met recovery targets and communities in all four lakes became more similar to those in the reference lakes. However, the continued absence of many daphniids, cyclopoids and large calanoids indicated that the lakes had not fully recovered and further monitoring is needed.
Synthesis and applications. Our results show that the choice of reference condition can alter recovery assessments. This finding emphasizes the importance of establishing clearly defined restoration goals to ensure appropriate choice of reference conditions. Restoration is unlikely to be judged as successful if an historical reference point is used to guide management actions meant to restore an ecosystem to present-day regional conditions.