Comparing habitat configuration strategies for retaining biodiversity under climate change
Version of Record online: 19 MAR 2013
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society
Journal of Applied Ecology
Volume 50, Issue 2, pages 519–527, April 2013
How to Cite
Mokany, K., Harwood, T. D., Ferrier, S. (2013), Comparing habitat configuration strategies for retaining biodiversity under climate change. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50: 519–527. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12038
- Issue online: 19 MAR 2013
- Version of Record online: 19 MAR 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 30 NOV 2012
- Manuscript Received: 11 JUL 2012
Fig. S1. The new reserves allocated under each reserve design strategy for each region of Tasmania.
Fig. S2. Dispersal probability as a function of distance from the source location for 12 dispersal treatments tested.
Fig. S3. The benefits for biodiversity from each reserve system objective for all 10 regions examined and region 10 only.
Fig. S4. The effect of allocating new conservation reserves on changing the reserve system connectivity, aggregation and representativeness.
Fig. S5. The conceptual approach to dynamic macroecological modelling of biodiversity change.
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.