SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Botts, E.A., Erasmus, B.F.N. & Alexander, G.J. (2012) Methods to detect species range size change from biological atlas data: a comparison using the South African Atlas Project. Biological Conservation, 146, 7280.
  • Dennis, R.L.H., Sparks, T.H. & Hardy, B.P. (1999) Bias in butterfly distribution maps: the effect of sampling effort. Journal of Insect Conservation, 3, 3342.
  • Dennis, R.L.H. & Thomas, C.D. (2000) Bias in butterfly distribution maps: the influence of hot spots and recorders home range. Journal of Insect Conservation, 4, 7377.
  • Dingemans, N. & Kalkman, V.J. (2008) Changing temperature regimes have advanced the phenology of Odonata in the Netherlands. Ecological Entomology, 33, 394402.
  • Hassall, C. (2012) Predicting the distributions of under-recorded Odonata using species distribution models. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 5, 192201.
  • Kendall, W.L. & White, G.C. (2009) A cautionary note on substituting spatial subunits for repeated temporal sampling in studies of site occupancy. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 11821188.
  • Kéry, M. (2010) Introduction to WinBUGS for Ecologists – A Bayesian Approach to Regression, ANOVA, Mixed Models and Related Analyses. Academic Press, Burlington, MA, USA.
  • Kéry, M., Royle, J.A., Schmid, H., Schaub, M., Volet, B., Häfliger, G. & Zbinden, N. (2010) Site-occupancy distribution modeling to correct population-trend estimates derived from opportunistic observations. Conservation Biology, 24, 13881397.
  • Kindberg, J., Ericsson, G. & Swenson, J.E. (2009) Monitoring rare or elusive large mammals using effort-corrected voluntary observers. Biological Conservation, 142, 159165.
  • Kuussaari, M., Heliölä, J., Pöyry, J. & Saarinen, K. (2007) Contrasting trends of butterfly species preferring semi-natural grasslands, field margins and forest edges in northern Europe. Journal of Insect Conservation, 11, 351366.
  • MacKenzie, D.I., Nichols, J.D., Royle, J.A., Pollock, K.H., Hines, J.E. & Bailey, L.L. (2006) Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Maes, D., van Reusel, W., Jacobs, I., Berwaerts, K. & van Dyck, H. (2012) Applying IUCN Red List criteria at a small regional level: a test case with butterflies in Flanders (North Belgium). Biological Conservation, 145, 258266.
  • Plummer, M. (2009) JAGS Version 1.0.3 manual. (http://sourceforge.net/projects/mcmc-jags/).
  • Pollard, E. & Yates, T. (1993) Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.
  • Robertson, M.P., Cumming, G.S. & Erasmus, B.F.N. (2010) Getting the most out of atlas data. Diversity and Distributions, 16, 363375.
  • Rota, C.T., Fletcher, R.J., Dorazio, R.M. & Betts, M.G. (2009) Occupancy estimation and the closure assumption. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 11731181.
  • Royle, J.A. & Dorazio, R.M. (2008) Hierarchical Modeling and Inference in Ecology. Academic Press, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Royle, J.A. & Kéry, M. (2007) A Bayesian state-space formulation of dynamic occupancy models. Ecology, 88, 8131823.
  • Schmeller, D.S., Henry, P.Y., Julliard, R., Gruber, B., Clobert, J., Dziock, F. et al. (2009) Advantages of volunteer-based biodiversity monitoring in Europe. Conservation Biology, 23, 307316.
  • Silvertown, J. (2009) A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24, 467470.
  • Snäll, T., Kindvall, O., Nilsson, J. & Pärt, T. (2010) Evaluating citizen-based presence data for bird monitoring. Biological Conservation, 144, 804810.
  • Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A. & Best, N.G. (2003) WinBUGS User Manual, Version 1.4. MCR Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK.
  • Szabo, J.K., Vesk, P.A., Baxter, P.W.J. & Possingham, H.P. (2010) Regional avian species declines estimated from volunteer-collected long-term data using List Length analysis. Ecological Applications, 20, 21572169.
  • Van Strien, A.J., van Swaay, C.A.M. & Kéry, M. (2011) Metapopulation dynamics in the butterfly Hipparchia semele changed decades before occupancy declined in The Netherlands. Ecological Applications, 21, 25102520.
  • Van Strien, A.J., Plantenga, W.F., Soldaat, L.L., van Swaay, C.A.M. & WallisDeVries, M.F. (2008) Bias in phenology assessments based on first appearance data of butterflies. Oecologia, 156, 227235.
  • Van Strien, A.J., Termaat, T., Groenendijk, D., Mensing, V. & Kéry, M. (2010) Site-occupancy models offer new opportunities for dragonfly monitoring based on daily species lists. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11, 495503.
  • Van Swaay, C.A.M., Plate, C.L. & van Strien, A. (2002) Monitoring butterflies in the Netherlands: how to get unbiased indices. Proceedings of the Experimental & Applied Entomology, NEV Amsterdam, 13, 2127.
  • Van Swaay, C.A.M., Termaat, T. & Plate, C.L. (2011) Handleiding Landelijke Meetnetten Vlinders en Libellen (Manual Monitoring Schemes Butterflies and Dragonflies). Rapport VS2011.001, De Vlinderstichting, Wageningen & Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Den Haag, the Netherlands.
  • Van Swaay, C.A.M. & Warren, M.S. (1999) Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and Environment No. 99, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, France.
  • Van Turnhout, C.A.M., Willems, F., Plate, C., van Strien, A., Teunissen, W., van Dijk, A. & Foppen, R. (2008) Monitoring common and scarce breeding birds in the Netherlands: applying a posthoc stratification and weighting procedure to obtain less biased population trends. Journal of Catalan Ornithology, 24, 1529.