Tree effects on grass growth in savannas: competition, facilitation and the stress-gradient hypothesis

Authors

  • Justin Dohn,

    Corresponding author
    • Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Dept. 1499, Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Fadiala Dembélé,

    1. Institut Polytechnique Rurale de Formation et de Recherche Appliqué (IPR/IFRA), de Katibougou, BP 06, Koulikouro, République du, Mali
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Moussa Karembé,

    1. Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Université de Bamako, Colline de Badalabougou, BP 3206, Bamako, République du, Mali
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Aristides Moustakas,

    1. School of Biological & Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK
    2. Institute of Integrative and Comparative Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Kosiwa A. Amévor,

    1. Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Université de Bamako, Colline de Badalabougou, BP 3206, Bamako, République du, Mali
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Niall P. Hanan

    1. Geographic Information Science Center of Excellence, South Dakota State University, Wecota Hall Box 506B, Brookings, SD, USA
    Search for more papers by this author

Correspondence author. E-mail: Justin.Dohn@colostate.edu

Summary

  1. The stress-gradient hypothesis (SGH) predicts an increasing importance of facilitative mechanisms relative to competition along gradients of increasing environmental stress. Although developed across a variety of ecosystems, the SGH's relevance to the dynamic tree–grass systems of global savannas remains unclear. Here, we present a meta-analysis of empirical studies to explore emergent patterns of tree–grass relationships in global savannas in the context of the SGH.
  2. We quantified the net effect of trees on understorey grass production relative to production away from tree canopies along a rainfall gradient in tropical and temperate savannas and compared these findings to the predictions of the SGH. We also analysed soil and plant nutrient concentrations in subcanopy and open-grassland areas to investigate the potential role of nutrients in determining grass production in the presence and absence of trees.
  3. Our meta-analysis revealed a shift from net competitive to net facilitative effects of trees on subcanopy grass production with decreasing annual precipitation, consistent with the SGH. We also found a significant difference between sites from Africa and North America, suggesting differences in tree–grass interactions in the savannas of tropical and temperate regions.
  4. Nutrient analyses indicate no change in nutrient ratios along the rainfall gradient, but consistent nutrient enrichment under tree canopies.
  5. Synthesis. Our results help to resolve questions about the SGH in semi-arid systems, demonstrating that in mixed tree–grass systems, trees facilitate grass growth in drier regions and suppress grass growth in wetter regions. Relationships differ, however, between African and North American sites representing tropical and temperate bioclimates, respectively. The results of this meta-analysis advance our understanding of tree–grass interactions in savannas and contribute a valuable data set to the developing theory behind the SGH.

Ancillary