Effects of topography on structuring local species assemblages in a Sri Lankan mixed dipterocarp forest
Article first published online: 27 NOV 2012
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Ecology © 2012 British Ecological Society
Journal of Ecology
Volume 101, Issue 1, pages 149–160, January 2013
How to Cite
Punchi-Manage, R., Getzin, S., Wiegand, T., Kanagaraj, R., Savitri Gunatilleke, C. V., Nimal Gunatilleke, I. A. U., Wiegand, K., Huth, A. (2013), Effects of topography on structuring local species assemblages in a Sri Lankan mixed dipterocarp forest. Journal of Ecology, 101: 149–160. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12017
- Issue published online: 21 DEC 2012
- Article first published online: 27 NOV 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 9 OCT 2012
- Manuscript Received: 19 FEB 2012
- Center for Tropical Forest Science of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
- Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University
- John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
- National Science Foundation, USA
- National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan
- German Academic Exchange Services. Grant Number: 233066
- ERC. Grant Number: 233066
- State of Lower Saxony
Figure S1. Map of Sinharaja forest dynamic plot.
Figure S2–S5. Structure of species assemblages of different growth forms (canopy, sub-canopy and understorey) for different life stages at 20 m spatial scale.
Figure S6. Number of indicator species for five topographic habitats in census 1 and 2 in different life stages.
Figure S7. Complete linkage and K-mean cluster analysis for different life stages of two censuses.
Figure S8. Multivariate regression tree analysis of different life stages for census 1 and 2 at 20 m spatial scale.
Figure S9. Structure of species assemblages for different life stages at 10 m spatial scale.
Figure S10. Structure of species assemblages and species richness for different life stages at 20 m spatial scale.
Figure S11. Structure of species assemblages for different life stages at 50 m spatial scale.
Table S1. Results of multivariate regression tree analysis and identified indicator species for the all canopy plants in different life stages.
Table S2. Variation of species composition explained by multivariate regression tree for different life stages in census 1 and 2.
Table S3. Indicator species analysis.
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.