Intuition and Reflection in Arithmetic: Bob Hale
Article first published online: 7 JAN 2003
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8349.00050
The Aristotelian Society 1999
Additional Information
How to Cite
Hale, B. (1999), Intuition and Reflection in Arithmetic: Bob Hale. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 73: 75–98. doi: 10.1111/1467-8349.00050
Publication History
- Issue published online: 7 JAN 2003
- Article first published online: 7 JAN 2003
- Abstract
- Cited By
Michael Potter considers several versions of the view that the truths of arithmetic are analytic and finds difficulties with all of them. There is, I think, no gainsaying his claim that arithmetic cannot be analytic in Kant’s sense. However, his pessimistic assessment of the view that what is now widely called Hume’s principle can serve as an analytic foundation for arithmetic seems to me unjustified. I consider and offer some answers to the objections he brings against it.

1467-8349/asset/bannerforeground.gif?v=1&s=02c897ee24e5b66837002d4943943337dc34765d)
1467-8349/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=e163530ae7e75575027fb335432f1cd0f63584d6)