SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alvesson, M. and S. Deetz (2000). Doing Critical Management Research. London: Sage.
  • Andersson, L. M. and C. M. Pearson (1999). ‘Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace’, Academy of Management Review, 24, pp. 452471.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). ‘Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioural change’, Psychological Review, 84, pp. 191215.
  • Billing, Y. D. (2011). ‘Are women in management victims of the phantom of the male norm?’, Gender, Work and Organization, 18, pp. 298317.
  • Bosak, J. and S. Sczesny (2011). ‘Exploring the dynamics of incongruent beliefs about women and leaders’, British Journal of Management, 22, pp. 254269.
  • Braidotti, R. (2003). ‘Becoming woman: or sexual difference revisited’, Theory, Culture and Society, 20, pp. 4364.
  • Broadbridge, A. and R. Simpson (2011). ‘25 years on: reflecting on the past and looking to the future in gender and management research’, British Journal of Management, 22, pp. 470483.
  • Brown, B. (1998). Unlearning Discrimination in the Early Years. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
  • Bryans, P. and S. Mavin (2003). ‘Women learning to become managers: learning to fit in or to play a different game?’, Management Learning, 34, pp. 111134.
  • Campbell, A. (2004). ‘Female competition: causes, constraints, content, and context’, Journal of Sex Research, 41, pp. 1626.
  • Camussi, E. and C. Leccardi (2005). ‘Stereotypes of working women: the power of expectations’, Social Science Information, 44, pp. 113140.
  • Capodilupo, C. M., K. L. Nadal, L. Corman, S. Hamit, O. B. Lyons and A. Weinberg (2010). ‘The manifestation of gender micro-aggressions’. In D. W. Sue (ed.), Micro-aggressions and Marginality: Manifestations, Dynamics and Impact, pp. 193216. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Catalyst (2007). The Double-bind Dilemma for Women in Leadership: Damned if You Do, Doomed if You Don't. New York: Catalyst.
  • Chesler, P. (2001). Women's Inhumanity to Woman. New York: Thunder's Mouth Press, Nations Books.
  • Chesterman, C., A. Ross-Smith and M. Peters (2005). ‘The gendered impact on organisations of a critical mass of women in senior management’, Policy and Society, 24, pp. 6991.
  • Cockburn, C. (1985). Machinery of Dominance: Women, Men and Technical Know-how, pp. 185186. London: Pluto Press.
  • Cockburn, C. (1991). In the Way of Women: Men's Resistance to Sex Equality in Organizations (No. 18). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and Power. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
  • Connell, R. W. and J. Messerschmidt (2005). ‘Hegemonic masculinity: rethinking the concept’, Gender and Society, 19, pp. 829859.
  • Cortina, L. M., V. J. Magley, J. H. Williams and R. D. Langhout (2001). ‘Incivility in the workplace: incidence and impact’, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, pp. 6480.
  • Crick, N. R., J. F. Casas and D. A. Nelson (2002). ‘Toward a more comprehensive understanding of peer maltreatment: studies of relational victimization’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, pp. 98101.
    Direct Link:
  • Davies, E. M. (2011). Women on FTSE Boards. Lord Davies Review. London: Gov.UK.
  • Denzin, N. and Y. Lincoln (2000). ‘Introduction. The discipline and practice of qualitative research’. In N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds), The Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 128. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Derks, B., N. Ellemers, C. van Laar and K. de Groot (2011). ‘Do sexist organizational cultures create the Queen Bee?’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, pp. 519535.
  • Dick, P. and C. Cassell (2004). ‘The position of policewomen: a discourse analytic study’, Work, Employment and Society, 18, pp. 5172.
  • Doldor, E., D. Anderson and S. Vinnicombe (2013). ‘Refining the concept of political will: a gender perspective’, British Journal of Management, 24, pp. 414427.
  • Ellemers, N., F. Rink, B. Derks and M. K. Ryan (2012). ‘Women in high places: when and why promoting women into top positions can harm them individually or as a group (and how to prevent this)’, Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, pp. 163187.
  • Fletcher, D. (2006). ‘Entrepreneurial processes and the social construction of opportunity’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, 18, pp. 421440.
  • Fotaki, M. (2011). ‘The sublime object of desire (for knowledge): sexuality at work in business and management schools in England’, British Journal of Management, 22, pp. 4253.
  • Gherardi, S. (1994). ‘The gender we think, the gender we do in everyday organizational life’, Human Relations, 47, pp. 591609.
  • Griffin, C. (1995). ‘Feminism, social psychology and qualitative research’, The Psychologist, 8, pp. 119121.
  • Harlos, K. (2010). ‘If you build a remedial voice mechanism, will they come? Determinants of voicing interpersonal mistreatment at work’, Human Relations, 63, pp. 311329.
  • Hershcovis, M. S. (2011). ‘Incivility, social undermining, bullying … oh my!: a call to reconcile constructs within workplace aggression research’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, pp. 499519.
  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
  • Kelan, E. K. and A. Mah (2014). ‘Gendered identification: between idealization and admiration’, British Journal of Management, 25, pp. 91101.
  • Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Ledwith, S. and F. Colgan (1996). Women in Management: Challenging Gender Politics. London: Macmillan.
  • Lim, S. and L. M. Cortina (2005). ‘Interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace: the interface and impact of general incivility and sexual harassment’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, pp. 483496.
  • Lincoln, Y. S. and E. G. Guba (1985). ‘Establishing trustworthiness’. In Y. S. Lincoln and E. G. Guba (eds), Naturalistic Inquiry, pp. 289331. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Linstead, S. (1997). ‘Abjection and organization: men, violence, and management’, Human Relations, 50, pp. 11151145.
  • Lipman-Blumen, J. (1984). Gender Roles and Power. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Maddock, S. and D. Parkin (1994). ‘Gender cultures: how they affect men and women at work’. In M. Davidson and R. Burke (eds), Women in Management: Current Research Issues, Ch. 3. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
  • Marshall, J. (1984). Women Travellers in a Male World. London: Wiley.
  • Martin, P. Y. (2003). ‘ “Said and done” versus “saying and doing”: gendering practices, practicing gender at work’, Gender and Society, 17, pp. 342366.
  • Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative Researching. London: Sage.
  • Mavin, S. (2006). ‘Venus envy: problematizing solidarity behaviour and Queen Bees’, Women in Management Review, 21, pp. 264276.
  • Mavin, S. (2008). ‘Queen bees, wannabees and afraid to bees: no more “best enemies” for women in management?’, British Journal of Management, 19, pp. S75S84.
  • Mavin, S. and G. Grandy (2012). ‘Doing gender well and differently in management’, Gender in Management: An International Journal, 27, pp. 218231.
  • Mavin, S. and G. Grandy (2013). ‘Doing gender well and differently in dirty work: the case of exotic dancing’, Gender, Work and Organization, 20, pp. 232251.
  • Messerschmidt, J. (2009). ‘ “Doing gender”: the impact and future of a salient sociological concept’, Gender and Society, 23, pp. 8588.
  • Nadal, K. L. (2010). ‘Gender microaggressions: implications for mental health’. In M. A. Paludi (ed.), Feminism and Women's Rights Worldwide, Vol. 2: Mental Health and Physical Health, pp. 155175. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
  • O'Neill, O. A. and C. A. O'Reilly (2011). ‘Reducing the backlash effect: self-monitoring and women's promotions’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, pp. 825832.
  • Parks-Stamm, E. J., M. E. Heilman and K. A. Hearns (2008). ‘Motivated to penalize: women's strategic rejection of successful women’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, pp. 237247.
  • Pierce, C., J. Carew, D. Pierce-Gonzalez and D. Willis (1978). ‘An experiment in racism: TV commercials’. In C. Pierce (ed.), Television and Education, pp. 6288. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Ross-Smith, A. and C. Chesterman (2009). ‘ “Girl disease”: women managers' reticence and ambivalence towards organizational advancement’, Journal of Management and Organization, 15, pp. 582595.
  • Rowbothan, S. (1973). Woman's Consciousness, Man's World. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Rudman, L. A. and J. E. Phelan (2008). ‘Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations’, Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, pp. 6179.
  • Sealy, R. and S. Vinnicombe (2013). The Female FTSE Board Report 2010: False Dawn of Progress for Women on Boards. International Centre for Women Leaders, Cranfield School of Management, sponsored by Barclays, London.
  • Sex and Power (2013). Who Runs Britain? Fawcett Society, 28 February. London: Centre for Women and Democracy.
  • Silverman, D. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research. A Practical Handbook. London: Sage.
  • Smith, D. E. (1987). The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
  • Spencer, A. and D. Podmore (1987). In a Man's World: Essays on Women in Male Dominated Professions. London: Taylor and Francis.
  • Staines, G., C. Travis and T. E. Jayerante (1973). ‘The Queen Bee syndrome’, Psychology Today, 7, pp. 5560.
  • Starr, K. (2001). ‘What makes management experience different for women? Secrets revealed through the structure of cathexis’, Proceedings of the Rethinking Gender, Work and Organization Conference, Keele, 27−29 June. Keele: Keele University.
  • Stead, V. and C. Elliott (2013). ‘Women's leadership learning: a reflexive review of representations and leadership teaching’, Management Learning, 44, pp. 373394.
  • Sue, D. W. (2010). Micro-aggressions in Everyday Life: Race, Gender and Sexual Orientation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Sue, D. W. and C. M. Capodilupo (2008). ‘Racial, gender, and sexual orientation microaggressions: implications for counseling and psychotherapy’. In D. W. Sue and D. Sue (eds), Counseling the Culturally Diverse: Theory and Practice, pp. 105130. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Tanenbaum, L. (2002). Catfight: Women and Competition. New York: Seven Stories.
  • Terjesen, S., R. Sealy and V. Singh (2009). ‘Women directors on corporate boards: a review and research agenda’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17, pp. 320337.
  • Thomas, R. and A. Davies (2005). ‘Theorizing the micro-politics of resistance: new public management and managerial identities in the UK public service’, Organization Studies, 26, pp. 683706.
  • Timmermans, S. and I. Tavory (2012). ‘Theory construction in qualitative research: from grounded theory to abductive analysis’, Sociological Theory, 30, pp. 167186.
  • Tyler, I. (2009). ‘Against abjection’, Feminist Theory, 10, pp. 7798.
  • Tyler, M. (2005). ‘Women in change management: Simone De Beauvoir and the co-optation of women's otherness’, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18, pp. 561577.
  • Tyler, M. (2011). ‘Tainted love: from dirty work to abject labour in Soho's sex shops’, Human Relations, 64, pp. 14771500.
  • Walby, S. (1989). ‘Theorising patriarchy’, Sociology, 23, pp. 213234.
  • Watson, T. (1998). ‘The labour of division: the manager as “self” and “other” ’. In K. Hetherington and R. Munro (eds), Ideas of Difference, pp. 139152. Oxford: Blackwell.