SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abts, K. and Rummens, S. (2007) ‘Populism versus Democracy’, Political Studies, 55 (2), 405424.
  • Alonso, S., Keane, J. and Merkel, W. (2011) ‘Editor's Introduction: Rethinking the Future of Representative Democracy’, in S. Alonso, J. Keane and W. Merkel (eds), The Future of Representative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 122.
  • Anderson, B. (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
  • Armony, A. and Schamis, A. (2005) ‘Babel in Democratization Studies’, Journal of Democracy, 16 (4), 113128.
  • Arditi, B. (2004) ‘Populism as a Spectre of Democracy: A Response to Canovan’, Political Studies, 52 (1), 135143.
  • Arditi, B. (2005) ‘Populism as an Internal Periphery of Democratic Politics’, in F. Panizza (ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso, pp. 7298.
  • Berezin, M. (2009) Illiberal Politics in Neoliberal Times: Culture, Security and Populism in the New Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Betz, H. G. (2007) ‘Against the “Green Totalitarianism”: Anti-Islamic Nativism in Contemporary Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe’, in C. S. Liang (ed.), Europe for the Europeans: The Foreign and Security Policy of the Populist Radical Right. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 3354.
  • Betz, H. G. and Johnson, C. (2004) ‘Against the Current – Stemming the Tide: The Nostalgic Ideology of the Contemporary Radical Populist Right’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 9 (3), 311327.
  • Cameron, M. A. and Sharpe, K. E. (2010) ‘Andean Left Turns: Constituent Power and Constitution Making’, in M. A. Cameron and E. Hershberg (eds), Latin America's Left Turns: Politics, Policies, and Trajectories of Change. Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 6178.
  • Canovan, M. (1984) ‘ “People”, Politicians, and Populism’, Government and Opposition, 19 (3), 312327.
  • Canovan, M. (1999) ‘Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy’, Political Studies, 47 (1), 216.
  • Canovan, M. (2004) ‘Populism for Political Theorists?’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 9 (3), 241252.
  • Canovan, M. (2005) The People. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Dahl, R. (1970) After the Revolution? Authority in a Good Society, revised edition. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
  • Dahl, R. (1989) Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
  • Dahl, R. (2003) How Democratic is the American Constitution?, second edition. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
  • De la Torre, C. (2007) ‘The Resurgence of Radical Populism in Latin America’, Constellations, 14 (3), 39897.
  • Dunn, J. (2005) Setting the People Free: The Story of Democracy. London: Atlantic Books.
  • Formisano, R. (2012) The Tea Party. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • FPÖ (2011) Handbuch Freiheitlicher Politik: Ein Leitfaden für Führungsaktionäre und Mandatsträger der Freiheitlichen Partei Österreichs. Vienna: FPÖ-Bildungsinstitut.
  • Freeden, M. (1996) Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Clarendon.
  • Freeden, M. (1998) ‘Is Nationalism a Distinct Ideology?’, Political Studies, 46 (4), 748765.
  • Habermas, J. (1992) Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des Demokratischen Rechtstaates, revised edition. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
  • Habermas, J. (1996) Die Einbeziehung des Anderen: Studien zur Politischen Theorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
  • Habermas, J. (2001) ‘Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?’, Political Theory, 29 (6), 766781.
  • Hawkins, K. (2010) Venezuela's Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Honig, B. (2001) ‘Dead Rights, Live Futures: A Reply To Habermas's “Constitutional Democracy” ’, Political Theory, 29 (6), 792805.
  • Jennings, I. (1956) The Approach to Self-Government. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kazin, M. (1995) The Populist Persuasion: An American History, revised edition. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Laclau, E. (2005) On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
  • Linz, J. and Stepan, A. (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-communist Europe. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Loughlin, M. and Walker, N. (eds) (2007) The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lowndes, J. (2012) ‘The Past and Future of Race in the Tea Party Movement’, in L. Rosenthal and C. Trost (eds), Steep: The Precipitous Rise of the Tea Party. Berkeley CA: University of California Press, pp. 152170.
  • Madrid, R. L. (2008) ‘The Rise of Ethnopopulism in Latin America’, World Politics, 60 (3), 475508.
  • Madrid, R. L. (2012) The Rise of Ethnic Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mann, M. (2005) The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Ethnic Cleansing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Moffitt, B. and Tormey, S. (2013 forthcoming) ‘Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style’, Political Studies. Doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.13032.
  • Møller, J. and Skaaning, S. E. (2011) ‘Stateness First?’, Democratization, 18 (1), 124.
  • Mudde, C. (2004) ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’, Government and Opposition, 39 (4), 541563.
  • Mudde, C. (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mudde, C. and Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2012a) ‘Populism and (Liberal) Democracy: A Framework for Analysis’, in C. Mudde and C. Rovira Kaltwasser (eds), Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 126.
  • Mudde, C. and Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2012b) ‘Populism: Corrective and Threat to Democracy’, in C. Mudde and C. Rovira Kaltwasser (eds), Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 205222.
  • Mudde, C. and Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2013) ‘Inclusionary versus Exclusionary Populism: Contemporary Europe and Latin America Compared’, Government and Opposition, 48 (2), 147174.
  • Mudde, C. and Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (forthcoming) ‘Populism’, in M. Freeden, M. Stears and L. T. Sargent (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Müller, J. W. (2011) Contesting Democracy: Political Ideas in Twentieth-Century Europe. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
  • Näsström, S. (2007) ‘The Legitimacy of the People’, Political Theory, 35 (5), 624658.
  • Näsström, S. (2011a) ‘The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle’, Political Studies, 59 (1), 116134.
  • Näsström, S. (2011b) ‘Where is the Representative Turn Going?’, European Journal of Political Theory, 10 (4), 501510.
  • Norris, P. (2011) Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ochoa Espejo, P. (2011) The Time of Popular Sovereignty. University Park TX: Pennsylvania University Press.
  • Plattner, M. (2010) ‘Populism, Pluralism, and Liberal Democracy’, Journal of Democracy, 21 (1), 8192.
  • Price Foley, E. (2012) The Tea Party: Three Principles. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Przeworksi, A. (2010) Democracy and the Limits of Self-Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rosanvallon, P. (2008) Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2012) ‘The Ambivalence of Populism: Threat and Corrective for Democracy’, Democratization, 19 (2), 184208.
  • Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (forthcoming) ‘Latin American Populism: Some Conceptual and Normative Lessons’, Constellations.
  • Saward, M. (2003) Democracy. London: Polity.
  • Saward, M. (2006) ‘The Representative Claim’, Contemporary Political Theory, 5 (3), 297318.
  • Saward, M. (2010) The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schumpeter, J. (1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.
  • Schwartzberg, M. (2007) Democracy and Legal Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Silva, E. (2009) Challenging Neoliberalism in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Skocpol, T. and Williamson, V. (2012) The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Smith, R. M. (2003) Stories of Peoplehood: The Politics and Morals of Political Membership. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Stanley, B. (2008) ‘The Thin Ideology of Populism’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 13 (1), 95110.
  • Taggart, P. (2000) Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Taggart, P. (2002) ‘Populism and the Pathology of Representative Politics’, in Y. Mény and Y. Surel (eds), Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 6280.
  • Tilly, C. (1993) Coercion, Capital and European States, AD 990–1990. Malden MA: Blackwell.
  • Tilly, C. (2007) Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Urbinati, N. (1998) ‘Democracy and Populism’, Constellations, 5 (1), 110124.
    Direct Link:
  • Urbinati, N. and Warren, M. E. (2008) ‘The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory’, Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 387412.
  • Walzer, M. (2012) ‘Editor's Page’, Dissent, 59 (2), 1.
  • Whelan, F. W. (1983) ‘Prologue: Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem’, in J. R. Pennock and J. W. Chapman (eds), Liberal Democracy. New York: New York University Press, pp. 1342.
  • Whitehead, L. (2002) Democratization: Theory and Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Yack, B. (2001) ‘Popular Sovereignty and Nationalism’, Political Theory, 29 (4), 517536.