SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Arzheimer, K. and Evans, J. (2012) ‘Geolocation and Voting: Candidate–Voter Distance Effects on Party Choice in the 2010 General Election in England’, Political Geography, 31 (5), 301310.
  • Banducci, S., Karp, J., Thrasher, M. and Rallings, C. (2008) ‘Ballot Photographs as Cues in Low-Information Elections’, Political Psychology, 29 (6), 903917.
  • Barreto, M., Villarreal, M. and Woods, N. (2005) ‘Metropolitan Latino Political Behavior: Voter Turnout and Candidate Preference in Los Angeles’, Journal of Urban Affairs, 27 (1), 7191.
  • Bartels, L. (2002) ‘The Impact of Candidate Traits in American Presidential Elections’, in A. King (ed.), Leaders' Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 4469.
  • Birch, S. and Allen, N. (2011) ‘Framing Ethical Judgements about Politicians: The Role of Informational Cues and Political Sophistication in Shaping how People Evaluate the Ethical Behaviour of Their Political Leaders’. Paper presented at ECPR General Conference, Reykjavik, 25–27 August.
  • Brouard, S. and Tiberj, V. (2010) ‘Yes They Can: An Experimental Approach to Eligibility of Ethnic Minority Candidates in France’, in K. Bird, T. Saalfeld and A. Wüst (eds), The Political Representation of Immigrants and Minorities: Voters, Parties and Parliaments in Liberal Democracies. London: Routledge/ECPR Studies in European Political Science, pp. 164180.
  • Butler, D. and Stokes, D. (1974) Political Change in Britain. London: Macmillan.
  • Campbell, R. and Cutts, D. (2009) ‘Do Women Vote for Women? Unpublished conference paper, Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
  • Carey, J. and Shugart, M. (1995) ‘Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Systems’, Electoral Studies, 14 (4), 417439.
  • Carnes, N. (2012) ‘Does the Numerical Underrepresentation of the Working Class in Congress Matter?’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 37 (1), 534.
  • Childs, S. and Cowley, P. (2011) ‘The Politics of Local Presence: Is There a Case for Descriptive Representation?’, Political Studies, 59 (1), 119.
  • Clarke, H., Sanders, D., Stewart, M. and Whiteley, P. (2008) ‘Internet Surveys and National Election Studies: A Symposium’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 18 (4), 327333.
  • Cook, E. (1998) ‘Voter Reaction to Women Candidates’, in S. Thomas and C. Wilcox (eds), Women and Elective Office: Past, Present and Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 5672.
  • Cowley, P. (2013) ‘Why Not Ask the Audience? Understanding the Public's Representational Priorities’, British Politics, 8 (2), 138163.
  • Crewe, I., Särlvik, B. and Alt, J. (1977) ‘Partisan Dealignment in Britain 1964–1974’, British Journal of Political Science, 7 (2), 129190.
  • Cutler, F. (2002) ‘The Simplest Shortcut of All: Sociodemographic Characteristics and Electoral Choice’, Journal of Politics, 64 (2), 466490.
  • Denver, D. and Hands, G. (1997) Modern Constituency Electioneering. London: Frank Cass.
  • Denver, D., Hands, G. and Fisher, J. (2002) ‘The Impact of Constituency Campaigning in the 2001 General Election’, British Election and Parties Review, 12 (1), 8094.
  • Dolan, K. (1998) ‘Voting for Women in the “Year of the Woman” ’, American Journal of Political Science, 42 (2), 272293.
  • Dolan, K. (2001) ‘Electoral Context, Issues and Voting for Women in the 1990s’, Women and Politics, 23 (1), 2136.
  • Dolan, K. (2004) Voting for Women: How the Public Evaluates Women Candidates. Boulder CO: Westview Press.
  • Druckman, J., Green, D., Kuklinski, J. and Lupia, A. (2006) ‘The Growth and Development of Experimental Research in Political Science’, American Political Science Review, 100 (4), 627635.
  • Dudley, R. and Rapoport, R. (1989) ‘Vice-Presidential Candidates and the Home State Advantage: Playing Second Banana at Home and on the Road’, American Journal of Political Science, 33 (2), 537540.
  • Fisher, J., Denver, D., Cutts, D., Fieldhouse, E. and Russell, A. (2007) ‘Constituency Campaigning in 2005: Ever More Centralisation’, in D. Wring, J. Green, R. Mortimore and S. Atkinson (eds), Political Campaigning. London: Palgrave, pp. 7992.
  • Fisher, S., Heath, A., Sanders, D. and Sobolewska, M. (2011) ‘Candidate Ethnicity and Electoral Behaviour at the 2010 British General Election’. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Reykjavik, 25–27 August.
  • Ford, R. (2008) ‘Is Racial Prejudice Declining in Britain?’, British Journal of Sociology, 59 (4), 609634.
  • Gallagher, M. (1980) ‘Candidate Selection in Ireland: The Impact of Localism and the Electoral System’, British Journal of Political Science, 10 (4), 489503.
  • Garand, J. (1988) ‘Localism and Regionalism in Presidential Elections: Is there a Home State or Regional Advantage?’, Western Political Quarterly, 41 (1), 85103.
  • Gorecki, M. and Marsh, M. (2011) ‘Not Just “Friends and Neighbours”: Canvassing, Geographic Proximity and Voter Choice’, European Journal of Political Research, 51 (5), 563582.
  • Huddy, L. and Terkildsen, N. (1993) ‘Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates’, American Journal of Political Science, 37 (1), 119147.
  • Johns, R. and Shephard, M. (2008) ‘Candidate Image and Electoral Preference in Britain’, British Politics, 3 (3), 324349.
  • Johnson, C. and Rosenblatt, G. (2007) ‘Do MPs Have the “Right Stuff”?’, Parliamentary Affairs, 60 (1), 164169.
  • Johnston, R., Jones, K., Sarker, R., Propper, C., Burgess, S. and Bolster, A. (2004) ‘Party Support and the Neighbourhood Effect: Spatial Polarisation of the British Electorate, 1991–2001’, Political Geography, 23 (4), 367402.
  • Jun, U. (2003) ‘Great Britain: From the Prevalence of the Amateur to the Dominance of the Professional Politician’, in J. Zeiss (ed.), The Political Class in Advanced Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 164186.
  • Kaufmann, K. (2003) ‘Black and Latino Voters in Denver: Responses to Each Other's Political Leadership’, Political Science Quarterly, 118 (1), 107126.
  • Key, V. (1949) Southern Politics. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • King, D. and Matland, R. (2003) ‘Sex and the Grand Old Party: An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Candidate Sex on Support for the Republican Candidate’, American Politics Research, 31 (6), 595612.
  • Lovenduski, J. (2005) Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • McDermot, M. (1998) ‘Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections’, Political Research Quarterly, 51 (4), 895918.
  • McDermot, M. (2005) ‘Candidate Occupations and Voter Information Shortcuts’, Journal of Politics, 67 (1), 201219.
  • Miller, A., Wattenberg, M. and Malanchuk, O. (1966) ‘Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates’, American Political Science Review, 80 (2), 521540.
  • Miller, W. and Shanks, M. J. (1996) The New American Voter. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Mughan, A. (2009) ‘Partisan Dealignment, Party Attachments and Leader Effects’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 19 (4), 413431.
  • Mutz, D. (2011) Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Norris, P. and Lovenduski, J. (1995) Political Recruitment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Norris, P., Vallance, E. and Lovenduski, J. (1992) ‘Do Candidates Make a Difference? Race, Gender, Ideology and Incumbency’, Parliamentary Affairs, 45 (4), 496547.
  • Paolino, P. (1995) ‘Group-Salient Issues and Group Representation: Support for Women Candidates in the 1992 Senate Elections’, American Journal of Political Science, 39 (2), 294313.
  • Pedersen, M., Kjaer, U. and Eliassen, K. (2007) ‘The Geographical Dimension of Parliamentary Recruitment – among Native Sons and Parachutists’, in M. Cotta and H. Best (eds), Democratic Representation in Europe: Diversity, Change and Convergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 160190.
  • Peterson, D. (2005) ‘Heterogeneity and Certainty in Candidate Evaluations’, Political Behavior, 27 (1), 124.
  • Plutzer, E. and Zipp, J. (1996) ‘Identity Politics, Partisanship, and Voting for Women Candidates’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 60 (1), 3057.
  • Rice, T. and Macht, A. (1987a) ‘Friends and Neighbors Voting in Statewide General Elections’, American Journal of Political Science, 31 (2), 448452.
  • Rice, T. and Macht, A. (1987b) ‘The Hometown Advantage: Mobilization or Conversion’, Political Behavior, 9 (3), 257262.
  • Riddell, P. (1993) Honest Opportunism: The Rise of the Career Politician. London: Hamish Hamilton.
  • Rosenberg, S. and McCafferty, P. (1987) ‘The Image and the Vote Manipulating Voters' Preferences’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 51 (1), 3147.
  • Ruostetsaari, I. (2003) ‘Finland: From Political Amateurs to Political Class’, in J. Borchert and J. Zeiss (eds), The Political Class in Advanced Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 107123.
  • Rush, M. (1994) ‘Career Patterns in British Politics: First Choose Your Party’, Parliamentary Affairs, 47 (4), 566582.
  • Saggar, S. (1998) Race and British Electoral Politics. London: Routledge.
  • Sanbonmatsu, K. (2002) ‘Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice’, American Journal of Political Science, 46 (1), 2034.
  • Sanders, D., Clarke, H., Stewart, M. and Whiteley, P. (2007) ‘Does Mode Matter for Modeling Political Choice’, Political Analysis, 15 (3), 257285.
  • Särlvik, B. and Crewe, I. (1983) Decade of Dealignment: The Conservative Victory of 1979 and Electoral Trends in the 1970s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Shepherd-Robinson, L. and Lovenduski, J. (2002) Women and Candidate Selection in British Political Parties. London: Fawcett.
  • Sigelman, C., Sigelman, L., Walkosz, B. and Nitz, M. (1995) ‘Black Candidates, White Voters: Understanding Racial Bias in Political Perceptions’, American Journal of Political Science, 39 (1), 243265.
  • Sigelman, L. and Welch, S. (1984) ‘Race, Gender, and Opinion toward Black and Female Presidential Candidates’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 48 (2), 467475.
  • Smith, E. and Fox, R. (2001) ‘The Electoral Fortunes of Women Candidates for Congress’, Political Research Quarterly, 54 (1), 205221.
  • Stokes-Brown, A. (2006) ‘Racial Identity and Latino Vote Choice’, American Politics Research, 34 (5), 627652.
  • Studlar, D. and McAllister, I. (1996) ‘Constituency Activity and Representational Roles among Australian Legislators’, Journal of Politics, 58 (1), 6990.
  • Terkildsen, N. (1992) ‘When White Voters Evaluate Black Candidates: The Processing Implication of Candidate Skin Color, Prejudice and Self-Monitoring’, Journal of Political Science, 37 (4), 10321053.
  • Trent, J., Thompson, C., Mongeau, P., Nusz, A. and Trent, J. (2001) ‘Image, Media Bias, and Voter Characteristics’, American Behavioural Scientist, 44 (12), 21012124.
  • Trent, J., Short-Thompson, C., Mongeau, P., Metzler, M., Erickson, A. and Trent, J. (2010) ‘Cracked and Shattered Ceilings: Gender, Race, Religion, Age, and the Ideal Candidate’, American Behavioural Scientist, 54 (3), 163183.
  • Weeks, L. (2008) ‘Candidate Selection: Democratic Centralism or Managed Democracy’, in M. Gallagher and M. Marsh (eds), How Ireland Voted 2007. London: Palgrave, pp. 4864.