Deliberative Democracy, Diversity and the Challenges of Citizenship Education
Article first published online: 7 MAR 2003
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9752.00213
The Journal of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain 2001
Additional Information
How to Cite
Enslin, P., Pendlebury, S. and Tjiattas, M. (2001), Deliberative Democracy, Diversity and the Challenges of Citizenship Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35: 115–130. doi: 10.1111/1467-9752.00213
Publication History
- Issue published online: 7 MAR 2003
- Article first published online: 7 MAR 2003
- Abstract
- Cited By
For democracies to thrive, citizens have to be taught to be democrats. How do people learn to be democrats in circumstances of diversity and plurality? We address this question via a discussion of three models of deliberative democracy: public reason (as exemplified by Rawls), discursive democracy (as exemplified by Benhabib) and communicative democracy (as exemplified by Young). Each of the three theorists contributes to an account of how to educate citizens by teaching talk. Against a commonly held assumption that the protection of diversity in a pluralist democracy requires a thin conception of citizenship education, we defend a thick conception that simultaneously fosters autonomy and participation without sacrificing tolerance of diversity.

1467-9752/asset/JOPE_centre.gif?v=1&s=4f2f90b76ba5612bda0bb02f98b6873069f48ec5)
1467-9752/asset/JOPE_right.gif?v=1&s=5bc1b1bac4cbec1b71b8ca4bb12ce7b2e13d6bb8)
1467-9752/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=bccc8cd98cf7eab88432ebfb47cb28e787642d14)