SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aigner, D., Lovell, C. A. K. and Schmidt, P. (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J. Econometr., 6, 2137.
  • Allen, R., Athanassopoulos, A., Dyson, R. G. and Thanassoulis, E. (1997) Weights restrictions and value judgements in data envelopment analysis: evolution, development and future directions. Ann. Oper. Res., 73, 1334.
  • Appa, G. and Yue, M. (1999) On setting scale efficient targets in DEA. J. Oper. Res. Soc., 50, 6069.
  • Arrow, K. J. (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values. New York, Wiley.
  • Association of Police Authorities (1999) Pounding the Beat: a Guide to Police Finance in England and Wales. London: Association of Police Authorities.
  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Mangmnt Sci., 30, 10781092.
  • Banker, R. D. and Morey, R. C. (1986) Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs. Oper. Res., 34, 513521.
  • Bauer, P. W. (1990) Recent developments in the econometric estimation of frontiers. J. Econometr., 46, 3956.
  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E. (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2, 429444.
  • Coelli, T. (1996) A guide to DEAP version 2.1: a data envelopment analysis (computer) program. Working Paper 96/08. Department of Econometrics, University of New England. (Available from www.une.edu. au/econometrics/cepa.htm.)
  • Cook, R. J. and Farewell, V. T. (1996) Multiplicity considerations in the design and analysis of clinical trials. J. R. Statist. Soc. A., 159, 93110.
  • Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M. and Tone, K. (2000) Data Envelopment Analysis: a Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, and References. Boston: Kluwer.
  • Cox, D. R., Fitzpatrick, R., Fletcher, A. E., Gore, S. M., Spiegelhalter, D. J. and Jones, D. R. (1992) Quality-of-life assessment: can we keep it simple (with discussion)? J. R. Statist. Soc. A, 155, 353393.
  • Cubbin, J. and Tzanidakis, G. (1998) Regression versus data envelopment analysis for efficiency measurement: an application to the England and Wales regulated water industry. Util. Poly, 7, 7585.
  • Debreu, G. (1951) The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica, 19, 273292.
  • Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (1999) Performance indicators for 2000/2001. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London. (Available from www.localregions.detr.gov.uk/bestvalue/bvindex.htm.)
  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. and Lovell, C. A. K. (1994) Production Frontiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Farrell, M. J. (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency (with discussion). J. R. Statist. Soc. A, 120, 253290.
  • Foucault, M. (1973) The Order of Things: an Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage.
  • Greene, W. H. (1995) LIMDEP7 Reference Manual. New York: Econometric Software.
  • Jondrow, J., Lovell, C. A. K., Materov, I. S. and Schmidt, P. (1982) On the estimation of technical efficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. J. Econometr., 19, 233238.
  • Koopmans, T. C. (ed.) (1951) Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation. New York: Wiley.
  • Lewis, S. (1986) Measuring output and performance: Data Envelopment Analysis. Report. Her Majesty's Treasury's Public Expenditure Survey Committee, Development Sub-Committee, London.
  • Mishan, E. J. (1988) Cost–Benefit Analysis: an Informal Introduction. London: Routledge.
  • Mitchell, R. C. and Carson, R. T. (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: the Contingent Valuation Method. Washington: Resources for the Future.
  • Mosteller, F. and Tukey, J. W. (1977) Data Analysis and Regression. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
  • Norman, M. and Stoker, B. (1991) Data Envelopment Analysis: the Assessment of Performance. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Nunamaker, T. R. (1985) Using Data Envelopment Analysis to measure the efficiency of non-profit organizations: a critical evaluation. Mang. Decsn Econ., 6, 5058.
  • Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing Government. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
  • Pedraja-Chaparro, F., Salinas-Jimenez, J. and Smith, P. (1997) On the role of weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. J. Product. Anal., 8, 215230.
  • Ray, A. (1984) Cost–Benefit Analysis: Issues and Methodologies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Renyi, A. and Sulanke, R. (1963) Uber die konvexe Hulle von n zufallige gewahlten Punkten. Z. Wahrsch. Ver. Geb., 2, 7584.
  • Schmidt, P. (1985) Frontier production functions. Econometr. Rev., 4, 289355.
  • Senn, S. (1989) Combining outcome measures: statistical power is irrelevant. Biometrics, 45, 10271028.
  • Shephard, R. W. (1970) The Theory of Cost and Production Functions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Smith, P. (1990) The use of performance indicators in the public sector. J. R. Statist. Soc.A. ,153, 5372.
  • — (1993) Outcome-related performance indicators and organizational control in the public sector. Br. J. Mangmnt., 4, 135151.
  • Spottiswoode, C. (2000) Improving police performance: a new approach to measuring police efficiency. Report. Public Services Productivity Panel, Her Majesty's Treasury, London. (Available from www.hmtreasury.gov.uk/pspp/studies.html.)
  • Stone, M. (1974) Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions (with discussion). J R Statist Soc B, 36, 111147.
  • Thanassoulis, E. (1995) Assessing police forces in England and Wales using Data Development Analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 87, 641657.
  • Thanassoulis, E., Dyson, R. G. and Foster, M. J. (1987) Relative efficiency assessments using Data Envelopment Analysis: an application to data on rates departments. J. Oper. Res. Soc., 38, 397411.
  • Watkins, C. J. C. H. (2000) Report of the July 2000 meeting of the Official Statistics Section of the Royal Statistical Society. RSS News, 28, no. 1, 19.

References in the discussion

  • Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E. and Cox, D. R. (1994) Inference and Asymptotics. London: Chapman and Hall.
  • Box, G. E. P. (1980) Sampling and Bayes’ inference in scientific modelling and robustness (with discussion). J. R. Statist. Soc. A, 143, 383430.
  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. and Roos, P. (2002) Integrating consumer satisfaction into productivity indexes. In Efficiency in the Public Sector (ed. K.Fox), pp. 201218.Boston: Kluwer.
  • Farrell, M. J. (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency (with discussion). J. R. Statist. Soc. A, 120, 253290.
  • Fernández, C., Koop, G. and Steel, M. F. J. (2000) A Bayesian analysis of multiple-output production frontiers. J. Econometr., 98, 4779.
  • — (2002) Multiple-output production with undesirable outputs: an application to nitrogen surplus in agriculture. J. Am. Statist. Ass., 97, in the press.
  • Fernández, C., Osiewalski, J. and Steel, M. F. J. (1997) On the use of panel data in stochastic frontier models with improper priors. J. Econometr., 79, 169193.
  • Fø rsund, F. R. and Sarafoglou, N. (2000) On the origins of data envelopment analysis. Memorandum 24/2000. Department of Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo.
  • Goldstein, H. and Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1996) League tables and their limitations: statistical issues in comparisons of institutional performance (with discussion). J. R. Statist. Soc. A, 159, 385443.
  • Jacobs, R. (2001) Alternative methods to examine hospital efficiency: data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. Hlth Care Mangmnt Sci., 4, no. 2, 103116.
  • Kim, Y. and Schmidt, P. (2000) A review and empirical comparison of Bayesian and classical approaches to inference on efficiency levels in stochastic frontier models with panel data. J. Product. Anal., 14, 91118.
  • Koop, G., Osiewalski, J. and Steel, M. F. J. (1994) Bayesian efficiency analysis with a flexible form: the AIM cost function. J. Bus. Econ. Statist., 12, 339346.
  • — (1997) Bayesian efficiency analysis through individual effects: hospital cost frontiers. J. Econometr., 76, 77105.
  • Milne, R. G. and Torsney, B. (1992) Non price-allocative procedures: Scottish solutions to a National Health Service problem. In Health Economics Worldwide: Proc. 2nd Wrld Congr. Health Economics, Zurich, Sept. 1990 (eds H. E.Frech III and P.Zweifel), pp. 187202. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • — (1993) Allocating public services in an administrative environment: the Scottish National Health Service's experience. In CREDES-CES Actes du Colloque Europe en de l'Analyse Economique aux Politiques de Santé (eds E.Levy and A.Mizrahi), pp. 7984. Paris: SCRIPTA Diffuscon.
  • — (1994) Public choice in the distribution of health services: some evidence of a command economy. In Proc. 43rd Int. Conf. Applied Econometrics Association, Lyons, pp. 3747.
  • — (1997) The efficiency of administrative governance: the experience of the pre-reform British national health service. J. Compar. Econ., 24, 161180.
  • Milne, R. G., Torsney, B.et al.(2001) Consultant outreach, 1991 to 1998: an update and extension on its distribution in Scotland. Hlth Bull., 59, 315331.
  • National Audit Office (2001) Inappropriate Adjustments to NHS Waiting Lists. London: National Audit Office.
  • Neyman, J. and Pearson, E. S. (1933) On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 231, 289337.
  • O'Brien, P. C. (1984) Procedures for comparing samples with multiple endpoints. Biometrics, 40, 10791087.
  • Pedraja-Chaparro, F., Salinas-Jiménez, J. and Smith, P. (1997) On the role of weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. J. Prod. Anal., 8, 215230.
  • Schmidt, P. and Sickles, R. (1984) Production frontiers and panel data. J. Bus. Econ. Statist., 2, 367374.
  • Shephard, R. W. (1953) Cost and Production Functions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • — (1974) Indirect Production Functions. Meisenheim am Glan: Hain.
  • — (1970) Theory of Cost and Production Functions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Simar, L. and Wilson, P. W. (2000a) A general methodology for bootstrapping in nonparametric frontier models. J. Appl. Statist., 27, 779802.
  • — (2000b) Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: the state of the art. J. Product. Anal., 13, 4978.
  • Smith, P. (1997) Model misspecification in data envelopment analysis. Ann. Oper. Res., 73, 233252.
  • Spottiswoode, C. (2000) Improving police performance: a new approach to measuring police efficiency. Report. Public Services Productivity Panel, Her Majesty's Treasury, London. (Available from www.hmtreasury.gov.uk/pspp/studies.html.)
  • Stone, M. (2002) Can public service efficiency measurement be made a useful tool of government?: lessons from the Spottiswoode Report. Publ. Money Mangmnt, 22, 3340.
  • Thanassoulis, E. (1996) A data envelopment analysis approach to clustering operating units for resource allocation purposes. Int. J. Mangmnt Sci., 24, 463476.
  • — (2001) Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis: a Foundation Text with Integrated Software. Boston: Kluwer.
  • Tofallis, C. (1997) Input efficiency profiling. Comput. Oper. Res., 24,253258.
  • Torsney, B. and Milne, R. (1999) Applications of statistics in health economics. In Aplicaciones Estadisticas un reto para el Nuevo Milenio(eds J. L.Fidalgo and J. M.Rodriguez), pp. 9096. Hesperides.
  • Williams, A. (2001) Science or marketing at WHO?: a commentary on World Health Report 2000. Hlth Econ., 10, no. 2, 93100.
  • World Health Organization (2000) The World Health Report 2000. Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva: World Health Organization.