SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Nathalie Gagné, Susan Parks, Cooperative learning tasks in a Grade 6 intensive English as a second language class: turn-taking and degree of participation, The Language Learning Journal, 2016, 44, 2, 169

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Shulin Yu, Icy Lee, Exploring Chinese students' strategy use in a cooperative peer feedback writing group, System, 2016, 58, 1

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Jenefer Philp, Susan Duchesne, Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2016, 36, 50

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Miwa Aoki Takeuchi, Friendships and Group Work in Linguistically Diverse Mathematics Classrooms: Opportunities to Learn for English Language Learners, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2016, 1

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Mimi Li, Deoksoon Kim, One wiki, two groups: Dynamic interactions across ESL collaborative writing tasks, Journal of Second Language Writing, 2016, 31, 25

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Kendall A. King, Alison Mackey, Research Methodology in Second Language Studies: Trends, Concerns, and New Directions, The Modern Language Journal, 2016, 100, S1
  7. 7
    Yuan-shan Chen, The effect of learner–learner interactions on a multiple-choice discourse completion task, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2016,

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Yuan-shan Chen, Chinese learners' cognitive processes in writing email requests to faculty, System, 2015, 52, 51

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Yong-Seon Jang, Effects of Pair/Group Work on English Vocabulary Acquisition, The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 2015, 15, 7, 629

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Heike Neumann, Kim McDonough, Exploring student interaction during collaborative prewriting discussions and its relationship to L2 writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 2015, 27, 84

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Danielle Guénette, Sara Kennedy, Suzanne Allard, Jacinthe Murphy, Interactions verbales et résolution de malentendus en français L2 entre locuteurs de L1 commune et différente: Une étude de cas, Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 2015, 6, 2, 237

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Olga Kozar, Language education via audio/videoconferencing (LEVAC): A discursive investigation, Linguistics and Education, 2015, 31, 86

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Jiyon Cook, Negotiation for Meaning and Feedback among Language Learners, Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2015, 6, 2, 250

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Maryam Soleimani, Sima Modirkhamene, Karim Sadeghi, Peer-mediated vs. individual writing: measuring fluency, complexity, and accuracy in writing, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 2015, 1

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Silvia Kunitz, Scriptlines as emergent artifacts in collaborative group planning, Journal of Pragmatics, 2015, 76, 135

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Martin Bygate, Sources, developments and directions of task-based language teaching, The Language Learning Journal, 2015, 1

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Hadisesh Yadollahi, Ali Rahimi, The Effects of Different Task Types on Learners’ Performance in Collaborative Virtual Learning Environment, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, 192, 526

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Kristin J. Davin, Francis J. Troyan, The Implementation of High-Leverage Teaching Practices: From the University Classroom to the Field Site, Foreign Language Annals, 2015, 48, 1
  19. 19
    Ian Clark, Guillaume Dumas, Toward a neural basis for peer-interaction: what makes peer-learning tick?, Frontiers in Psychology, 2015, 6,

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Anne Edstrom, Triads in the L2 classroom: Interaction patterns and engagement during a collaborative task, System, 2015, 52, 26

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Yuko Goto Butler, Wei Zeng, Young learners’ interactional development in task-based paired-assessment in their first and foreign languages: a case of English learners in China, Education 3-13, 2015, 43, 3, 292

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Seung Chun Lee, A post-mortem on the Malaysian content-based instruction initiative, Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 2014, 24, 1, 41

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Yiqian (Katherine) Cao, A Sociocognitive Perspective on Second Language Classroom Willingness to Communicate, TESOL Quarterly, 2014, 48, 4
  24. 24
    Theresa A. Antes, Audio glossing during information-gap activities: The effect on learner output, System, 2014, 45, 163

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Luxin Yang, Examining the mediational means in collaborative writing: Case studies of undergraduate ESL students in business courses, Journal of Second Language Writing, 2014, 23, 74

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Alireza Memari Hanjani, Li Li, Exploring L2 writers' collaborative revision interactions and their writing performance, System, 2014, 44, 101

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    Heike Neumann, Kim McDonough, Exploring the relationships among student preferences, prewriting tasks, and text quality in an EAP context, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2014, 15, 14

    CrossRef

  28. 28
    Nafiseh Hosseinpour, Reza Biria, Improving Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing through Task-based Collaboration, Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2014, 4, 11

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    Faustin Mutwarasibo, Promoting University Students' Engagement in Learning Through Instructor-Initiated EFL Writing Groups, TESOL Journal, 2014, 5, 4
  30. 30
    Seyyed Dariush Ahmadi, Seyyedeh Susan Marandi, Social Software in the Classroom: The Case of Wikis for Scaffolding, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, 98, 100

    CrossRef

  31. 31
    Gary J. Ockey, The potential of the L2 group oral to elicit discourse with a mutual contingency pattern and afford equal speaking rights in an ESP context, English for Specific Purposes, 2014, 35, 17

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    Alison F. Doubleday, Sarah J. Wille, We are what we do: Examining learner-generated content in the anatomy laboratory through the lens of activity theory, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2014, 7, 5
  33. 33
    Yuko Goto Butler, Wei Zeng, Young Foreign Language Learners’ Interactions During Task-Based Paired Assessments, Language Assessment Quarterly, 2014, 11, 1, 45

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    Huahui Zhao, Cases on Professional Distance Education Degree Programs and Practices, 2014,

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    Keiko Kitade, Engaging Language Learners through Technology Integration, 2014,

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    P. D. Toth, E. Wagner, K. Moranski, 'Co-constructing' Explicit L2 Knowledge with High School Spanish Learners through Guided Induction, Applied Linguistics, 2013, 34, 3, 279

    CrossRef

  37. 37
    Melinda Martin-Beltran, “I don’t feel as embarrassed because we’re all learning”: Discursive positioning among adolescents becoming multilingual, International Journal of Educational Research, 2013, 62, 152

    CrossRef

  38. 38
    Paul J. Moore, An Emergent Perspective on the Use of the First Language in the English-as-a-Foreign-Language Classroom, The Modern Language Journal, 2013, 97, 1
  39. 39
    Masatoshi Sato, Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention, The Modern Language Journal, 2013, 97, 3
  40. 40
    Ana Fernández Dobao, Avram Blum, Collaborative writing in pairs and small groups: Learners' attitudes and perceptions, System, 2013, 41, 2, 365

    CrossRef

  41. 41
    YouJin Kim, Effects of Pretask Modeling on Attention to Form and Question Development, TESOL Quarterly, 2013, 47, 1
  42. 42
    이지희, Jinhwa Lee, Effects of Role Assignment and Proficiency Difference in Low Level Learners’ Pair Interaction in English, English Teaching, 2013, 68, 4, 193

    CrossRef

  43. 43
    Mimi Li, Individual novices and collective experts: Collective scaffolding in wiki-based small group writing, System, 2013, 41, 3, 752

    CrossRef

  44. 44
    Marie Källkvist, Languaging in Translation Tasks Used in a University Setting: Particular Potential for Student Agency?, The Modern Language Journal, 2013, 97, 1
  45. 45
    K.J. Topping, R. Dehkinet, S. Blanch, M. Corcelles, D. Duran, Paradoxical effects of feedback in international online reciprocal peer tutoring, Computers & Education, 2013, 61, 225

    CrossRef

  46. 46
    Mimi Li, Wei Zhu, Patterns of computer-mediated interaction in small writing groups using wikis, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2013, 26, 1, 61

    CrossRef

  47. 47
    Xu Geng, Gibson Ferguson, Strategic planning in task-based language teaching: The effects of participatory structure and task type, System, 2013, 41, 4, 982

    CrossRef

  48. 48
    Kristin J. Davin, Richard Donato, Student Collaboration and Teacher-Directed Classroom Dynamic Assessment: A Complementary Pairing, Foreign Language Annals, 2013, 46, 1
  49. 49
    Jenefer Philp, Noriko Iwashita, Talking, tuning in and noticing: exploring the benefits of output in task-based peer interaction, Language Awareness, 2013, 22, 4, 353

    CrossRef

  50. 50
    Yongcan Liu, The social organisation of talk-in-interaction at work in a language teacher professional community, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2013, 2, 3, 195

    CrossRef

  51. 51
    Chao-Jung Ko, Can synchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) help beginning-level foreign language learners speak?, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2012, 25, 3, 217

    CrossRef

  52. 52
    Joshua J. Thoms, Classroom Discourse in Foreign Language Classrooms: A Review of the Literature, Foreign Language Annals, 2012, 45, s1
  53. 53
    A. Fernandez Dobao, Collaborative Dialogue in Learner-Learner and Learner-Native Speaker Interaction, Applied Linguistics, 2012, 33, 3, 229

    CrossRef

  54. 54
    Ana Fernández Dobao, Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work, Journal of Second Language Writing, 2012, 21, 1, 40

    CrossRef

  55. 55
    Satomi Kawaguchi, Yuan Ma, Corrective Feedback, Negotiation of Meaning and Grammar Development: Learner-Learner and Learner-Native Speaker Interaction in ESL, Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 2012, 02, 02, 57

    CrossRef

  56. 56
    Ji Won Lee, Effects of Computer-Enhanced and Regular Types of Gradual Release of Responsibility Writing Instruction, STEM Journal, 2012, 13, 2, 81

    CrossRef

  57. 57
    Lourdes Ortega, Epilogue: Exploring L2 writing–SLA interfaces, Journal of Second Language Writing, 2012, 21, 4, 404

    CrossRef

  58. 58
    Ian Clark, Formative Assessment: Assessment Is for Self-regulated Learning, Educational Psychology Review, 2012, 24, 2, 205

    CrossRef

  59. 59
    R. Batstone, Language form, task-based language teaching, and the classroom context, ELT Journal, 2012, 66, 4, 459

    CrossRef

  60. 60
    Masatoshi Sato, Susan Ballinger, Raising language awareness in peer interaction: a cross-context, cross-methodology examination, Language Awareness, 2012, 21, 1-2, 157

    CrossRef

  61. 61
    Shirin Abadikhah, The effect of mechanical and meaningful production of output on learning English relative clauses, System, 2012, 40, 1, 129

    CrossRef

  62. 62
    Gillian Wigglesworth, Neomy Storch, What role for collaboration in writing and writing feedback, Journal of Second Language Writing, 2012, 21, 4, 364

    CrossRef

  63. 63
    Zhang Jie, Chinese College Students' Abilities and Attitudes for Peer Review, Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2011, 34, 4

    CrossRef

  64. 64
    Neomy Storch, Collaborative Writing in L2 Contexts: Processes, Outcomes, and Future Directions, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2011, 31, 275

    CrossRef

  65. 65
    Ali Shehadeh, Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2, Journal of Second Language Writing, 2011, 20, 4, 286

    CrossRef

  66. 66
    REBECCA ADAMS, ANA MARÍA NUEVO, TAKAKO EGI, Explicit and Implicit Feedback, Modified Output, and SLA: Does Explicit and Implicit Feedback Promote Learning and Learner–Learner Interactions?, The Modern Language Journal, 2011, 95,
  67. 67
    David N. Ishii, Paired learners’ verbalised strategies for determining grammatical correctness: a turn-based system for coding metatalk, Language Awareness, 2011, 20, 4, 359

    CrossRef

  68. 68
    YUCEL YILMAZ, Task Effects on Focus on Form in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication, The Modern Language Journal, 2011, 95, 1
  69. 69
    박수정, The Effects of Lexical Assistance on Korean EFL Learners’ Focus on Morphosyntax During a Synchronous Text-Based CMC Task, English Teaching, 2011, 66, 3, 149

    CrossRef

  70. 70
    Marie-Madeleine Kenning, Collaborative scaffolding in online task-based voice interactions between advanced learners, ReCALL, 2010, 22, 02, 135

    CrossRef

  71. 71
    Li Jin, Wei Zhu, Dynamic Motives in ESL Computer-Mediated Peer Response, Computers and Composition, 2010, 27, 4, 284

    CrossRef

  72. 72
    Alison Mackey, Rebecca Adams, Catherine Stafford, Paula Winke, Exploring the Relationship Between Modified Output and Working Memory Capacity, Language Learning, 2010, 60, 3
  73. 73
    REIKO YOSHIDA, How Do Teachers and Learners Perceive Corrective Feedback in the Japanese Language Classroom?, The Modern Language Journal, 2010, 94, 2
  74. 74
    Junghee Hwang, Interaction Patterns in Joint Editing Output Tasks and the Learning Outcomes, The Jungang Journal of English Language and Literature, 2010, 52, 1, 457

    CrossRef

  75. 75
    Silvana Dushku, Investigating engagement response tokens in spoken narrative discourse, Classroom Discourse, 2010, 1, 2, 142

    CrossRef

  76. 76
    Junghee Hwang, Negotiation about Form across L2 Proficiency Levels and Its Role in Second Language Learning, English Teaching, 2010, 65, 2, 47

    CrossRef

  77. 77
    Yucel Yilmaz, Gisela Granena, The effects of task type in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication, ReCALL, 2010, 22, 01, 20

    CrossRef

  78. 78
    Chutamas Sundrarajun, Richard Kiely, The oral presentation as a context for learning and assessment, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 2010, 4, 2, 101

    CrossRef

  79. 79
    MELINDA MARTIN–BELTRÁN, The Two-Way Language Bridge: Co-Constructing Bilingual Language Learning Opportunities, The Modern Language Journal, 2010, 94, 2
  80. 80
    Yi-hsiu Lai, Which do students prefer to evaluate their essays: Peers or computer program, British Journal of Educational Technology, 2010, 41, 3
  81. 81
    Amanda Kibler, Writing through two languages: First language expertise in a language minority classroom, Journal of Second Language Writing, 2010, 19, 3, 121

    CrossRef

  82. 82
    Alan Fortune, A Review of “Task-based language learning and teaching: theoretical, methodological, and pedagogical perspectives”, Language Awareness, 2009, 18, 2, 234

    CrossRef

  83. 83
    Jenefer Philp, Rita Tognini, Language acquisition in foreign language contexts and the differential benefits of interaction, IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 2009, 47, 3-4

    CrossRef

  84. 84
    MERRILL SWAIN, SHARON LAPKIN, IBTISSEM KNOUZI, WATARU SUZUKI, LINDSAY BROOKS, Languaging: University Students Learn the Grammatical Concept of Voice in French, The Modern Language Journal, 2009, 93, 1
  85. 85
    Gang Zeng, Shigenobu Takatsuka, Text-based peer–peer collaborative dialogue in a computer-mediated learning environment in the EFL context, System, 2009, 37, 3, 434

    CrossRef

  86. 86
    Johannes Eckerth, Investigating consciousness-raising tasks: pedagogically targeted and non-targeted learning gains, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2008, 18, 2
  87. 87
    고명희, Investigation of Small Group Interaction in a Korean University EFL Classroom, English Teaching, 2008, 63, 4, 167

    CrossRef

  88. 88
    Reiko Yoshida, Learners' Perception of Corrective Feedback in Pair Work, Foreign Language Annals, 2008, 41, 3
  89. 89
    Neomy Storch, Metatalk in a Pair Work Activity: Level of Engagement and Implications for Language Development, Language Awareness, 2008, 17, 2, 95

    CrossRef

  90. 90
    Yuko Watanabe, Peer–Peer Interaction between L2 Learners of Different Proficiency Levels: Their Interactions and Reflections, Canadian Modern Language Review, 2008, 64, 4, 605

    CrossRef

  91. 91
    Evelina D. Galaczi, Peer–Peer Interaction in a Speaking Test: The Case of theFirst Certificate in EnglishExamination, Language Assessment Quarterly, 2008, 5, 2, 89

    CrossRef

  92. 92
    Yuko Watanabe, Merrill Swain, Perception of Learner Proficiency: Its Impact on the Interaction Between an ESL Learner and Her Higher and Lower Proficiency Partners, Language Awareness, 2008, 17, 2, 115

    CrossRef

  93. 93
    Alan Fortune, Analysing Learner Language - By Rod Ellis and Gary Barkhuizen, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2007, 17, 1
  94. 94
    Linda Borer, Depth of Processing in Private and Social Speech: Its Role in the Retention of Word Knowledge by Adult EAP Learners, Canadian Modern Language Review, 2007, 64, 2, 269

    CrossRef

  95. 95
    Naomi Kurata, Language choice and second language learning opportunities in learners? social networks, Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 2007, 30, 1, 5.1

    CrossRef

  96. 96
    Le Pham Hoai Huong, The More Knowledgeable Peer, Target Language Use, and Group Participation, Canadian Modern Language Review, 2007, 64, 2, 329

    CrossRef

  97. 97
    Alison Mackey, Susan Gass, INTRODUCTION, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2006, 28, 02

    CrossRef

  98. 98
    Neomy Storch, Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections, Journal of Second Language Writing, 2005, 14, 3, 153

    CrossRef

  99. 99
    Gillian Wigglesworth, CURRENT APPROACHES TO RESEARCHING SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNER PROCESSES, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2005, 25,

    CrossRef

  100. 100
    LOURDES ORTEGA, For What and for Whom Is Our Research? The Ethical as Transformative Lens in Instructed SLA, The Modern Language Journal, 2005, 89, 3
  101. 101
    Anita Malmqvist, How Does Group Discussion in Reconstruction Tasks Affect Written Language Output?, Language Awareness, 2005, 14, 2-3, 128

    CrossRef

  102. 102
    Jennifer Ewald, Language-Related Episodes in an Assessment Context: A 'Small-Group Quiz', Canadian Modern Language Review, 2005, 61, 4, 565

    CrossRef

  103. 103
    Anthony Bruton, Task-based language teaching: For the state secondary FL classroom?, The Language Learning Journal, 2005, 31, 1, 55

    CrossRef

  104. 104
    Jessica Williams, Tutoring and revision: Second language writers in the writing center, Journal of Second Language Writing, 2004, 13, 3, 173

    CrossRef

  105. 105
    Neomy Storch, Using Activity Theory to Explain Differences in Patterns of Dyadic Interactions in an ESL Class, Canadian Modern Language Review, 2004, 60, 4, 457

    CrossRef

  106. 106
    Frank A. Morris, Elaine E. Tarone, Retracted: Impact of Classroom Dynamics on the Effectiveness of Recasts in Second Language Acquisition, Language Learning, 2003, 53, 2
  107. 107
    Neomy Storch, Relationships formed in dyadic interaction and opportunity for learning, International Journal of Educational Research, 2002, 37, 3-4, 305

    CrossRef

  108. 108
    Melissa A. Bowles, Rebecca J. Adams, An Interactionist Approach to Learner–learner Interaction in Second and Foreign Language Classrooms,
  109. 109
    Neomy Storch, Collaborative Language Learning, The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
  110. 110
    Merrill Swain, Wataru Suzuki, Interaction, Output, and Communicative Language Learning,
  111. 111
    Merrill Swain, Yuko Watanabe, Languaging: Collaborative Dialogue as a Source of Second Language Learning, The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
  112. 112
    References,
  113. 113
    Steven L. Thorne, John Hellermann, Sociocultural Approaches to Expert–novice Relationships in Second Language Interaction,