Raiffeisenism abroad: why did German cooperative banking fail in Ireland but prosper in the Netherlands?

Authors


  • This article draws on graduate research conducted by the authors: Colvin, ‘Religion, competition and liability’, and McLaughlin, ‘Microfinance institutions’. Earlier versions were presented at the European Historical Economics Society Conference, Dublin, September 2011; the Women's Committee Workshop of the Economic History Society, Oxford, November 2011; the Agricultural and Food Economics Seminar at Technische Universität München, Freising, February 2012; and the European Social Science History Conference, Glasgow, April 2012. We thank Graham Brownlow, Ewen Cameron, Vincent Comerford, David Greasley, Joost Jonker, Liam Kennedy, William A. Smyth, and John Turner for invaluable comments on an earlier working paper distributed by the European University Institute, and Timothy Guinnane and two anonymous referees for showing us how to improve our original submission to this journal.

Abstract

Why did imitations of Raiffeisen's rural cooperative savings and loans associations work well in some European countries, but fail in others? This article considers the example of Raiffeisenism in Ireland and in the Netherlands. Raiffeisen banks arrived in both places at the same time, but had drastically different fates. In Ireland they were almost wiped out by the early 1920s, while in the Netherlands they proved to be a long-lasting institutional transplant. Raiffeisen banks were successful in the Netherlands because they operated in niche markets with few competitors, while rural financial markets in Ireland were unsegmented and populated by long-established incumbents, leaving little room for new players, whatever their institutional advantages. Dutch Raiffeisen banks were largely self-financing, closely integrated into the wider rural economy, and able to take advantage of economic and religious divisions in rural society. Their Irish counterparts were not.

Ancillary