The Constitutional Imagination

Authors

  • Martin Loughlin

    Search for more papers by this author
    • Professor of Public Law, London School of Economics & Political Science. This is the revised text of the 43rd annual Chorley Lecture given on 17 June 2014. I have benefitted from responses from many colleagues to the lecture and from subsequent discussion at a Faculty seminar at the University of Pennsylvania Law School in September. I should like especially to thank Chris Foley, Frank Michelman, Yaniv Roznai and Neil Walker for detailed comments on the initial written draft.

Abstract

The constitutional imagination refers to the way we have been able to conceive the relationship between thought, text and action in the constitution of modern political authority. The lecture seeks to demonstrate how modern constitutional texts come to be invested with a ‘world-making’ capacity. The argument is advanced first by explaining how social contract thinkers have been able to set the parameters of the constitutional imagination (thought), then by showing that constitutions are agonistic documents and their interpretative method is determined by a dialectic of ideology and utopia (text), and finally by examining the degree to which constitutions have been able to colonise the political domain, thereby converting constitutional aspiration into political reality (action). It concludes by suggesting that although we seem to be entering a constitutional age, this is an ambiguous achievement and whether the power of the constitutional imagination can still be sustained remains an open question.

Ancillary