Taking Silk: An Empirical Study of the Award of Queen's Counsel Status 1981–2015

Authors

  • Michael Blackwell

    Search for more papers by this author
    • Assistant Professor, London School of Economics & Political Science. Unless otherwise stated all URLs were last accessed on 20 March 2015. My thanks to the three anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier draft of this paper. My thanks also to Linda Mulcahy and Jouni Kuha for their comments on still earlier drafts. This work was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council [grant number ES/H013261/1].

Abstract

This article considers which junior barristers are appointed to the rank of Queen's Counsel. The criticisms of the old appointments system are discussed and statistical methods are used to assess whether the changes to the QC appointments system introduced in 2004 improved the prospects of appointment for groups, such as women, that were disadvantaged by the previous system. The results show that under the reformed system groups that were historically less likely to be appointed QCs, such as women, continue to be so. However it is discussed how this may (partly) be attributable to lower rates of application, rather than unfair discrimination among applicants.

Ancillary