The author wishes to express his heartfelt gratitude to G. John Ikenberry for his enthusiasm for what started out as a joint project on the US–Japan alliance, and for his substantial and valuable interactions with the author on the subject over the last three years.
A call for a new Japanese foreign policy: the dilemmas of a stakeholder state
Article first published online: 2 JUL 2014
© 2014 The Author(s). International Affairs © 2014 The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Volume 90, Issue 4, pages 943–958, July 2014
How to Cite
INOGUCHI, T. (2014), A call for a new Japanese foreign policy: the dilemmas of a stakeholder state. International Affairs, 90: 943–958. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12149
- Issue published online: 2 JUL 2014
- Article first published online: 2 JUL 2014
Japanese foreign policy is at a crossroads. A global power transition is under way; while the United States remains the leading global power, across the globe non-western developing states are on the rise. Within Asia, China is a growing presence, wielding expansive claims on islands and maritime rights, and embarking on a defence buildup. As power shifts across Asia and the wider world, the terms of leadership and global governance have become more uncertain. Japan now finds itself asking basic questions about its own identity and strategic goals as a Great Power. Within this changing context, there are three foreign policy approaches available to Japan: (1) a classical realist line of working closely with the US in meeting China's rise and optimizing deep US engagement with China by pursuing a diplomacy focused on counterbalancing and hedging; (2) a transformative pragmatist line of rejuvenating itself through Abenomics and repositioning itself in East Asia; and (3) a liberal international line of pursuing a common agenda of enhancing global liberal-oriented norms and rules through multilateral institutions along with the United States and the Asia–Pacific countries. Current Japanese foreign policy contains a mix of all three approaches. The article argues that a greater focus on the second and the third lines would enhance the current approach; it would ensure that Japan is more in harmony with the global environment and help it work positively for global and regional stability and prosperity, thus enabling Japan to pursue an ‘honorable place in the world’ (as stated in the preamble to its constitution).