I would like to sincerely thank Ananya Roy, Jeremiah Bohr, Jesse Ribot, Ashwini Chhatre, and three anonymous IJURR reviewers for their invaluable feedback on earlier drafts. All shortcomings remain my own. This research was supported by an American Institute of Indian Studies Dissertation Research Fellowship and a National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grant (#727308).
Paying for Pipes, Claiming Citizenship: Political Agency and Water Reforms at the Urban Periphery
Article first published online: 27 MAY 2013
© 2013 Urban Research Publications Limited
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
Volume 38, Issue 2, pages 590–608, March 2014
How to Cite
Ranganathan, M. (2014), Paying for Pipes, Claiming Citizenship: Political Agency and Water Reforms at the Urban Periphery. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38: 590–608. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12028
- Issue published online: 27 FEB 2014
- Article first published online: 27 MAY 2013
- an American Institute of Indian Studies Dissertation Research Fellowship
- National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grant. Grant Number: 727308
- lower middle class;
- neoliberal water governance;
- political consciousness;
This article interrogates the nature of political agency deployed at sites of market-oriented water reforms. It presents a case study from Bangalore, India of a water project mandating significant ‘beneficiary’ cash contributions from lower-middle-class dwellers for the capital cost of extending piped water to the city's peripheries. Drawing on quantitative and ethnographic data, it illustrates why property owners who lack formal water access and land tenure — groups referred to in this article as the ‘peripheralized middle class’ — consent to paying for pipes rather than resist all together despite the high cost involved. It argues that far from reflecting an internalization of a ‘willingness to pay’ or ‘stakeholder’ ethos celebrated by development practitioners today, payment for water provides an insurgent means to bargain for greater symbolic recognition, respectability and material benefits from the state. In particular, payment for pipes enables peripheral dwellers to strengthen their claims to secure land tenure in an era of exclusionary and punitive spatial policies. Payment thus comprises a terrain of contested meaning making and political struggle, at the heart of which lie the stakes of urban citizenship. In documenting the process by which property related interests and tenure claims are advanced under a scenario of reforms, this article contributes to Gramscian political-ecological conversations on subaltern political agency and the lived character of hegemony in urban environments.