Correction Note: This article was first published online on the 4th of July 2013, under a subscription publication licence. The article has since been made OnlineOpen, and the copyright line and licence statement was therefore updated in June 2014.
Planning Histories and Practices of Circulating Urban Knowledge
Article first published online: 4 JUL 2013
© 2013 The Authors. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main St, Malden, MA 02148, USA on behalf of Urban Research Publications Limited.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
Volume 37, Issue 5, pages 1499–1509, September 2013
How to Cite
Harris, A. and Moore, S. (2013), Planning Histories and Practices of Circulating Urban Knowledge. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37: 1499–1509. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12043
- Issue published online: 19 AUG 2013
- Article first published online: 4 JUL 2013
- Knowledge circulation;
- Urban policy
This symposium creates and stimulates new dialogue and cross-disciplinary exchange between planning theorists and geographers in researching the transfer of urban policy and planning models, ideas and techniques. The symposium challenges a restricted historical focus in much of the emerging geographical literature on urban policy mobilities by drawing on a rich tradition within planning history of exploring and documenting the trans-urban travel of planning ideas and models over the last 150 years. It is argued that this longer-term perspective is required to highlight important historical continuities and institutional legacies to contemporary urban policy circuits and pathways and to question what is particularly new, distinct and innovative about an intensification in the travel of urban ideas, plans and policies over the past decade — and the accompanying scholarly interest in them. The symposium also uses the emphasis on particular details and specific experiences within planning histories to foreground and develop approaches, particularly from recent geographical scholarship, that investigate the contingent and embodied practices and wider epistemic contexts that enable — or hinder — contemporary policy transfer.