Putting Bourdieu to work for class analysis: reflections on some recent contributions†
- †I would like to thank Vegard Jarness and Marianne Nordli Hansen for having read several drafts of this paper and shared their insightful reflections and reactions with me; John Scott for numerous detailed and useful comments on an earlier version; and the Journal's four anonymous referees for helpful reviews. Thanks also to the participants of the Workshop on studies of elites and elite legitimacy in York October 2011 as well as the participants and lecturers John Scott and Fiona Devine on the PhD course on Social stratification, class analysis and class mobility in Oslo September 2011. I am very grateful to Juliet Munden for generously proof-reading the manuscript.
(Corresponding author email: magne.flemmen@sosgeo.uio.no)
Abstract
Recent developments in class analysis, particularly associated with so-called ‘cultural class analysis’; have seen the works of Pierre Bourdieu take centre stage. Apart from the general influence of ‘habitus’ and ‘cultural capital’, some scholars have tried to reconstruct class analysis with concepts drawn from Bourdieu. This involves a theoretical reorientation, away from the conventional concerns of class analysis with property and market relations, towards an emphasis on the multiple forms of capital. Despite the significant potential of these developments, such a reorientation dismisses or neglects the relations of power and domination founded in the economic institutions of capitalism as a crucial element of what class is. Through a critique of some recent attempts by British authors to develop a ‘Bourdieusian’ class theory, the paper reasserts the centrality of the relations of power and domination that used to be the domain of class analysis. The paper suggests some elements central to a reworked class analysis that benefits from the power of Bourdieu's ideas while retaining a perspective on the fundamentals of class relations in capitalism.