SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Brenner DJ, Staley JT, Krieg NR. Classification of procaryotic organisms and the concept of bacterial speciation. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, eds. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. 2nd edn. Volume 2: The proteobacteria. Part A: Introductory essays. New York: Springer, 2005; 2732.
  • 2
    Moore ERB, Mihaylova SA, Vandamme P, Krichevsky MI, Dijkshoorn L. Microbial systematics and taxonomy: relevance for a microbial commons. Res Microbiol 2010; 161: 430438.
  • 3
    Fleischmann RD, Adams MD, White O et al. Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science 1995; 269: 496512.
  • 4
    Schleifer KH. Classification of Bacteria and Archaea: past, present and future. Syst Appl Microbiol 2009; 32: 533542.
  • 5
    Stackebrandt E. Forces shaping bacterial systematics. Microbe 2007; 2: 283288.
  • 6
    McCarthy BJ, Bolton ET. An approach to the measurement of genetic relatedness among organisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1963; 50: 156164.
  • 7
    Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR et al. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37: 463464.
  • 8
    Woese CR. Bacterial evolution. Microbiol Rev 1987; 51: 221271.
  • 9
    Stackebrandt E, Frederiksen W, Garrity GM et al. Report of the ad hoc committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52: 10431047.
  • 10
    Rosselló-Móra R. Updating prokaryotic taxonomy. J Bacteriol 2005; 187: 62556257.
  • 11
    Lapage SP, Sneath PHA, Lessel EF, Skerman VBD, Seeliger HPR, Clark WA, eds. International code of nomenclature of bacteria (1990 revision). Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1992.
  • 12
    Gillis M, Vandamme P, Vos P, Swings J, Kersters K. Polyphasic taxonomy. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, eds. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. 2nd edn. Volume 2: The proteobacteria. Part A: Introductory essays. New York: Springer, 2005; 4348.
  • 13
    Kämpfer P, Glaeser SP. Prokaryotic taxonomy in the sequencing era—the polyphasic approach revisited. Environ Microbiol 2012; 14: 291317.
  • 14
    Tindall BJ, Rosselló-Móra R, Busse HJ, Ludwig W, Kämpfer P. Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60: 249266.
  • 15
    Ludwig W, Klenk HP. Overview: a phylogenetic backbone and taxonomic framework for procaryotic systematics. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, eds. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. 2nd edn. Volume 2: The proteobacteria. Part A: Introductory essays. New York: Springer, 2005; 4966.
  • 16
    Kämpfer P. Systematics of prokaryotes: the state of the art. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2012; 101: 311.
  • 17
    Zhi XY, Zhao W, Li WJ, Zhao GP. Prokaryotic systematics in the genomics era. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2012; 101: 2134.
  • 18
    Stackebrandt E, Ebers J. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today 2006; 33: 152155.
  • 19
    Drancourt M, Raoult D. Taxonomic position of the Rickettsiae: current knowledge. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1994; 13: 1324.
  • 20
    Rosselló-Móra R, Urdiain M, López-López A. DNA–DNA hybridization. Methods Microbiol 2011; 38: 325347.
  • 21
    Loman NJ, Constantinidou C, Chan JZM et al. High-throughput bacterial genome sequencing: an embarrassment of choice, a world of opportunity. Nat Rev Microbiol 2012; 10: 599606.
  • 22
    Didelot X, Bowden R, Wilson DJ, Peto TEA, Crook DW. Transforming clinical microbiology with bacterial genome sequencing. Nat Rev Genet 2012; 13: 601612.
  • 23
    Fournier PE, Raoult D. Prospects for the future using genomics and proteomics in clinical microbiology. Annu Rev Microbiol 2011; 65: 169188.
  • 24
    Iverson V, Morris RM, Frazar CD, Berthiaume CT, Morales RL, Armbrust EV. Untangling genomes from metagenomes: revealing an uncultured class of marine euryarchaeota. Science 2012; 335: 587590.
  • 25
    Lasken RS. Genomic sequencing of uncultured microorganisms from single cells. Nat Rev Microbiol 2012; 10: 631640.
  • 26
    Jones AL. The future of taxonomy. Adv Appl Microbiol 2012; 80: 2335.
  • 27
    Klenk HP, Göker M. En route to a genome-based classification of Archaea and Bacteria? Syst Appl Microbiol 2010; 33: 175182.
  • 28
    Gao B, Gupta R. Microbial systematics in the post-genomics era. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2012; 101: 4554.
  • 29
    Thompson C, Vicente A, Souza R et al. Genomic taxonomy of vibrios. BMC Evol Biol 2009; 9: 258.
  • 30
    Bennett JS, Jolley KA, Earle SG et al. A genomic approach to bacterial taxonomy: an examination and proposed reclassification of species within the genus Neisseria. Microbiology 2012; 158: 15701580.
  • 31
    Doolittle WF, Bapteste E. Pattern pluralism and the Tree of Life hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 20432049.
  • 32
    Whitman W. Intent of the nomenclatural Code and recommendations about naming new species based on genomic sequences. Bull BISMiS 2011; 2: 135139.
  • 33
    Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 25672572.
  • 34
    Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM. DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57: 8191.
  • 35
    Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 1912619131.
  • 36
    Deloger M, El Karoui M, Petit MA. A genomic distance based on MUM indicates discontinuity between most bacterial species and genera. J Bacteriol 2009; 191: 9199.
  • 37
    Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2: 142148.
  • 38
    Auch AF, Von Jan M, Klenk HP, Göker M. Digital DNA–DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2: 117134.
  • 39
    Rosselló-Móra R. Towards a taxonomy of Bacteria and Archaea based on interactive and cumulative data repositories. Environ Microbiol 2012; 14: 318334.
  • 40
    Vanlaere E, Baldwin A, Gevers D et al. Taxon K, a complex within the Burkholderia cepacia complex, comprises at least two novel species, Burkholderia contaminans sp. nov. and Burkholderia lata sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59: 102111.
  • 41
    Prakash O, Gihring TM, Dalton DD et al. Geobacter daltonii sp. nov., an Fe(III)- and uranium(VI)-reducing bacterium isolated from a shallow subsurface exposed to mixed heavy metal and hydrocarbon contamination. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60: 546553.
  • 42
    Hoffmann M, Monday SR, Allard MW et al. Vibrio caribbeanicus sp. nov., isolated from the marine sponge Scleritoderma cyanea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62: 17361743.
  • 43
    Mikalsen J, Olsen AB, Tengs T, Colquhoun DJ. Francisella philomiragia subsp. noatunensis subsp. nov., isolated from farmed Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57: 19601965.
  • 44
    Ritalahti KM, Justicia-Leon SD, Cusick KD et al. Sphaerochaeta globosa gen. nov., sp. nov. and Sphaerochaeta pleomorpha sp. nov., free-living, spherical spirochaetes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62: 210216.
  • 45
    Löffler FE, Yan J, Ritalahti KM et al. Dehalococcoides mccartyi gen. nov., sp. nov., obligate organohalide-respiring anaerobic bacteria, relevant to halogen cycling and bioremediation, belong to a novel bacterial class, Dehalococcoidetes classis nov., within the phylum Chloroflexi. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.034926-0 [Epub ahead of print].
  • 46
    Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K et al. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature 2009; 462: 10561060.
  • 47
    Ricker N, Qian H, Fulthorpe RR. The limitations of draft assemblies for understanding prokaryotic adaptation and evolution. Genomics 2012; 100: 167175.
  • 48
    Klassen J, Currie C. Gene fragmentation in bacterial draft genomes: extent, consequences and mitigation. BMC Genomics 2012; 13: 14.
  • 49
    Gargis AS, Kalman L, Berry MW et al. Assuring the quality of next-generation sequencing in clinical laboratory practice. Nat Biotechnol 2012; 30: 10331036.
  • 50
    Ozen AI, Vesth T, Ussery DW. From genome sequence to taxonomy—a skeptic's view. In: Rosenberg E, DeLong EF, Stackebrandt E, Lory S, Thompson F, eds. The prokaryotes, 4th edn. Berlin: Springer, 2012.
  • 51
    Sutcliffe I, Trujillo M, Goodfellow M. A call to arms for systematists: revitalising the purpose and practises underpinning the description of novel microbial taxa. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2012; 101: 1320.
  • 52
    Figueras M, Beaz-Hidalgo R, Collado L, Martínez-Murcia A. Recommendations for a new bacterial species description based on analyses of the unrelated genera Aeromonas and Arcobacter. Bull BISMiS 2011; 2: 116.
  • 53
    Lagier JC, Armougom F, Million M et al. Microbial culturomics: paradigm shift in the human gut microbiome study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012; 18: 11851193.
  • 54
    Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Peptoniphilus timonensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7: 111.