Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery
Article first published online: 2 NOV 2012
© 2012 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology © 2012 RCOG
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Special Issue: Urogynaecology and female pelvic reconstructive surgery
Volume 120, Issue 2, pages 152–160, January 2013
How to Cite
Gyhagen, M., Bullarbo, M., Nielsen, T. and Milsom, I. (2013), Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 120: 152–160. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12020
- Issue published online: 14 DEC 2012
- Article first published online: 2 NOV 2012
- Accepted manuscript online: 2 NOV 2012 12:00AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 12 SEP 2012
- Body mass index;
- caesarean section;
- long-term risk factor;
- pelvic organ prolapse;
- perineal laceration;
- urinary incontinence;
- vacuum extraction;
- vaginal delivery
Please cite this paper as: Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen T, Milsom I. Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. BJOG 2012; DOI : 10.1111/1471-0528.12020.
Objective To investigate prevalence and risk factors for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (sPOP) and sPOP concomitant with urinary incontinence (UI) in women 20 years after one vaginal delivery or one caesarean delivery.
Design Registry-based national cohort study.
Setting Women who returned a postal questionnaire in 2008 (response rate 65.2%).
Population Singleton primiparae with a birth in 1985–88 and no further births (n = 5236).
Methods The SWEPOP study used validated questionnaires about sPOP and UI.
Main outcome measures Prevalence rate and risk of sPOP with or without concomitant UI.
Results Prevalence of sPOP was higher after vaginal delivery compared with caesarean section (14.6 versus 6.3%, odds ratio [OR] 2.55; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.98–3.28) but was not increased after acute compared with elective caesarean section. Episiotomy, vacuum extraction and second-degree or more laceration were not associated with increased risk of sPOP compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery. Symptomatic POP increased 3% (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01–1.05) with each unit increase of current BMI and by 3% (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.02–1.05) for each 100 g increase of infant birthweight. Mothers ≤160 cm who delivered a child with birthweight ≥4000 g had a doubled prevalence of sPOP compared with short mothers who delivered an infant weighing <4000 g (24.2 versus 13.4%, OR 2.06; 95% CI 1.19–3.55). Women with sPOP had UI and UI > 10 years more often than women without prolapse.
Conclusion The prevalence of sPOP was doubled after vaginal delivery compared with caesarean section, two decades after one birth. Infant birthweight and current BMI were risk factors for sPOP after vaginal delivery.