SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance G, O'Brien J, Stoddart GL. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • 2
    Drummond MF, Schwartz JS, Jönsson B, Luce BR, Neumann PJ, Siebert U, et al. Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2008;24:24458.
  • 3
    Rennie D, Luft HS. Pharmacoeconomic analyses. JAMA 2000;283:215860.
  • 4
    Neumann PJ, Stone PW, Chapman RH, Sandberg EA, Bell CM. The quality of reporting in published cost-utility analyses, 1976-1997. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:964.
  • 5
    Rosen AB, Greenberg D, Stone PW, Olchanski NV, Neumann PJ. Quality of abstracts of papers reporting original cost-effectiveness analyses. Med Decis Making 2005;25:4248.
  • 6
    Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D. Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review. Syst Rev 2012;1:60.
  • 7
    Drummond MF. A reappraisal of economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals. Science or marketing? Pharmacoeconomics 1998;14:19.
  • 8
    McGhan WF, Al M, Doshi JA, Kamae I, Marx SE, Rindress D. The ISPOR good practices for quality improvement of cost-effectiveness research task force report. Value Health 2009;12:108699.
  • 9
    Task force on principles for economic analysis of health care technology. Economic analysis of health care technology. A report on principles. Ann Intern Med 1995;123:6170.
  • 10
    Drummond MF, Jefferson TO. Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. BMJ 1996;313:27583.
  • 11
    Gold MR. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
  • 12
    Siegel JE, Weinstein MC, Russell LB, Gold MR. Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA 1996;276:133941.
  • 13
    Nuijten MJ, Pronk MH, Brorens MJ, Hekster YA, Lockefeer JH, de Smet PA, et al. Reporting format for economic evaluation: part II: focus on modelling studies. Pharmacoeconomics 1998;14:25968.
  • 14
    Vintzileos AM, Beazoglou T. Design, execution, interpretation, and reporting of economic evaluation studies in obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:10706.
  • 15
    Drummond M, Manca A, Sculpher M. Increasing the generalizability of economic evaluations: recommendations for the design, analysis, and reporting of studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005;21:16571.
  • 16
    Ramsey S, Willke R, Briggs A, Brown R, Buxton M, Chawla A, et al. Good research practices for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials: the ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force report. Value Health 2005;8:52133.
  • 17
    Goetghebeur MM, Wagner M, Khoury H, Levitt RJ, Erickson LJ, Rindress D. Evidence and value: impact on decisionmaking—the EVIDEM framework and potential applications. BMC Health Serv Rev 2008;8:270.
  • 18
    Davis JC, Robertson MC, Comans T, Scuffham PA. Guidelines for conducting and reporting economic evaluation of fall prevention strategies. Osteoporos Int 2010;22:244959.
  • 19
    Petrou S, Gray A. Economic evaluation using decision analytical modelling: design, conduct, analysis, and reporting. BMJ 2011;342:d1766.
  • 20
    Petrou S, Gray A. Economic evaluation alongside randomised controlled trials: design, conduct, analysis, and reporting. BMJ 2011;342:d1548.
  • 21
    Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: a Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluations Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force. Value Health 2013;16:23150.
  • 22
    Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, Altman DG. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000217.
  • 23
    Moher D, Weeks L, Ocampo M, et al. Describing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review. J Clin Epi 2011; 64:71842.
  • 24
    Campbell SM, Hann M, Roland MO, Quayle JA, Shekelle PG. The effect of panel membership and feedback on ratings in a two-round Delphi survey: results of a randomized controlled trial. Med Care 1999;37:9648.