SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Barton MB, Harris R, Fletcher SW. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How? JAMA 1999;282:127080.
  • 2
    Ma I, Dueck A, Gray R, Wasif N, Giurescu M, Lorans R, et al. Clinical and self breast examination remain important in the era of modern screening. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:148490.
  • 3
    Bulletin AP. Cervical cytology screening (replaces committee opinion 152, March 1995). Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:41727.
  • 4
    Stiles M, Redmer J, Paddock E, Schrager S. Gynecologic issues in geriatric women. J Womens Health 2012;21:49.
  • 5
    Oestreicher N, Lehman CD, Seger DJ, Buist DS, White E. The incremental contribution of clinical breast examination to invasive cancer detection in a mammography screening program. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:42832.
  • 6
    Tang TS, Skye EP. Who gets “kicked out” of the exam room? Factors associated with patients declining medical student participation. Teach Learn Med 2009;21:17.
  • 7
    Mol SS, Peelen JH, Kuyvenhoven MM. Patients' views on student participation in general practice consultations: a comprehensive review. Med Teach 2011;33:e397400.
  • 8
    Jha V, Jha V, Setna Z, Al-Hity A, Quinton ND, Roberts TE. Patient Involvement in teaching and assessing intimate examination skills: a systematic review. Med Educ 2010;44:34757.
  • 9
    Bokken L, Rethans JJ, van Heurn L, Duvivier R, Scherpbier A, Van der Vleuten C. Student's views on the use of real patients simulated patients in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med, 2009;84:95863.
  • 10
    Macintosh MC, Chard T. Pelvic manikins as learning aids. Med Educ 1997;31:1946.
  • 11
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaf J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:2649.
  • 12
    Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011;306:97888.
  • 13
    Kirkpatrick D. Revisiting Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Model. Train Dev 1996;50:549.
  • 14
    Reed DA, Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Levine RB, Kern DE, Wright SM. Association between funding and quality of published medical education research. JAMA 2007;298:10029.
  • 15
    Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2008;300:1181196.
  • 16
    Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005;27:1028.
  • 17
    Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:55760.
  • 18
    Deladisma AM, Gupta M, Kotranza A, Bittner JG 4th, Imam T, Swinson D, et al. A pilot study to intregrate an immersive virtual patient with a breast complaint and breast examination simulator into a surgery clerkship. Am J Surg 2009;197:1026.
  • 19
    Gerling GJ, Thomas GW. Effect of augmented visual performance feedback on the effectiveness of clinical breast examination training with a dynamically configurable breast model. IEEE 2003;3:2095100.
  • 20
    Gerling GJ, Thomas GW. Augmented, pulsating tactile feedback facilitates simulator training of clinical breast examinations. Hum Factors 2005;47:67081.
  • 21
    Gerling GJ, Weissman AM, Thomas GW, Dove EL. Effectiveness of a dynamic breast examination training model to improve clinical breast examination (CBE) skills. Cancer Detect Prev 2003;27:4516.
  • 22
    Johnson GH, Brown TC, Stenchever MA, Gabert HA, Poulson AM, Warenski JC. Teaching pelvic examination to second year medical students using programmed patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975;121:7147.
  • 23
    Nelson LH. Use of professional patients in teaching pelvic examinations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978;52:6303.
  • 24
    Holzman GB, Singleton D, Holmes TF, Maatsch JK. Initial pelvic examination instruction: the effectiveness of three contemporary approaches. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977;129:12429.
  • 25
    Pugh CM, Heinrichs WL, Dev P, Srivastava S, Krummel TM. Use of a mechanical simulator to assess pelvic examination skills. JAMA 2001;286:10213.
  • 26
    Pugh CM, Srivastava S, Shavelson R, Walker D, Cotner T, Scarloss B, et al. The effect of simulator use on learning and self-assessment: the case of Stanford University's E-pelvis simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform 2001;81:396400.
  • 27
    Pugh CM, Obadina ET, Aidoo KA. Fear of causing harm: use of mannequin-based simulation to decrease student axiety prior to interacting with female teaching associates. Teach Learn Med 2009;21:11620.
  • 28
    McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence Acad Med 2011;86:70611.
  • 29
    Campbell HS, Fletcher SW, Lin S, Pilgrim CA, Morgan TM. Improving physicians' and nurses' clinical breast examination: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Prev Med 1991;7:18.
  • 30
    Pilgrim C, Lannon C, Harris RP, Cogburn W, Fletcher SW. Improving clinical breast examination training in a medical school: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Int Med 1993;8:6858.
  • 31
    Campbell HS, McBean M, Mandin H, Bryant H. Teaching medical students how to perform a clinical breast examination. Acad Med 1994;69:9935.
  • 32
    Benincasa TA, King ES, Rimer BK, Bloom HS, Balshem A, James J, et al. Results of an office-based training program in clinical breast examination for primary care physicians. Cancer Educ 1996;11:2531.
  • 33
    McDermott M, Dolan NC, Rademaker A. Effect of breast-tissue characteristeics on the outcome of clinical breast examination training. Acad Med 1996;71:5057.
  • 34
    Madan AK, Aliabadi-Wahle S, Babbo AM, Posner M, Beech DJ. Education of medical students in clinical breast examination during surgical clerkship. Am J Surg 2002;184:63741
  • 35
    Pugh CM, Salud LH. Fear of missing a lesion: use of simulated breast models to decrease student anxiety when learning clinical breast examinations. Am J Surg 2007;193:76670.
  • 36
    Steiner E, Austin DF, Prouser N. Detection and description of small breast masses by residents trained using a standardized clinical breast exam curriculum. J Gen Intern Med 2007;23:12934.
  • 37
    Naylor RA, Hollett LA, Valentine RJ, Mitchell IC, Bowling MW, Ma AM, et al. Can medical students achieve skills profiency through simulation training?. Am J Surg 2009;198:27782.
  • 38
    Rakestraw PG, Vontver LA, Irby DM. Utilization of an anthropomorphic model in pelvic examination instruction. J Med Educ 1985;60:3435.
  • 39
    Fitzpatrick M, Ta A, Lenchus J, Arheart KL, Rosen LF, Birnbach DJ, Sexual assault forensic examiners' training and assessment using simulation technology. J Emerg Nurs 2012;38:8590.
  • 40
    Loveless MB, Finkenzeller D, Ibrahim S, Satin AJ. A simulation program for teaching obstetrics and gynecology residents the pediatric gynecology examination and procedures. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2011;24:12736.