• 1
    Guihard P, Blondel B. Trends in risk factors for caesarean sections in France between 1981 and 1995: lessons for reducing the rates in the future. BJOG 2001;108:4855.
  • 2
    Queenan JT. How to stop the relentless rise in cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:199200.
  • 3
    Rayburn WF, Zhang J. Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:1647.
  • 4
    Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy UM, Laughon SK, Branch DW, Burkman R, et al. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:326.
  • 5
    Singh R, Nath TA. Is the caesarean section rate a performance indicator of an obstetric unit? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011;24:2047.
  • 6
    Boulvain M, Marcoux S, Bureau M, Fortier M, Fraser W. Risks of induction of labour in uncomplicated term pregnancies. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2001;15:1318.
  • 7
    Dublin S, Lydon-Rochelle M, Kaplan RC, Watts DH, Critchlow CW. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor without an identified indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:98694.
  • 8
    Heffner LJ, Elkin E, Fretts RC. Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:28793.
  • 9
    Maslow AS, Sweeny AL. Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol 2000;1:91722.
  • 10
    Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:698704.
  • 11
    Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: A review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;1:62833.
  • 12
    Caughey AB, Nicholson JM, Cheng YW, Lyell DJ, Washington AE, Caughey AB, et al. Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:7005.
  • 13
    Glantz JC, Glantz JC. Term labor induction compared with expectant management. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:706.
  • 14
    Dare MR, Middleton P, Crowther CA, Flenady VJ, Varatharaju B. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 2006;(1):CD005302.
  • 15
    Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Farine D, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Myhr TL, et al. Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. TERMPROM study group. N Engl J Med 1996;334:100510.
  • 16
    Challis JRG, Sloboda DM, Alfaidy N, Lye SJ, Gibb W, Patel FA, et al. Prostaglandins and mechanisms of preterm birth. Reproduction 2002;124:117.
  • 17
    Gulmezoglu AM, Crowther CA, Middleton P. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 2006;(4):CD004945.
  • 18
    Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, Gienger A, Cheng YW, McDonald KM, et al. Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:25263.
  • 19
    Juni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2001;323:426.
  • 20
    Husslein P, Egarter C, Sevelda P. Induction of labour with prostaglandin E2 vvaginal tablets - A revival of elective induction? Results of prospective randomised trial Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1986;46:837.
  • 21
    Breart G, Goujard J, Maillard F, Chavigny C, Rumeau-Rouquette C, Sureau C. Comparison of 2 obstetrical attitudes vis-a-vis inducing labor at term. Randomized study. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 1982;11:10712.
  • 22
    Benito R V, Hurtado MR, Rodriguez RF, Reyes SD, Alvarez Leon EE, Garcia Hernandez JA. Elective termination versus expectant management in prolonged pregnancy: a prospective study of 200 pregnant women. Progresos de Obstetricia Y Ginecologia 2010;53:44653.
  • 23
    Suikkari AM, Jalkanen M, Heiskala H, Koskela O. Prolonged pregnancy: induction or observation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 1983;116:58.
  • 24
    Boulvain M, Senat M-V, Rozenberg P, Irion O. Induction of labor or expectant management for large-for-dates fetuses: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206(S1):2.
  • 25
    Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Haslam RR, Robinson JS. Timing of birth for women with a twin pregnancy at term: a randomised controlled trial. BMC pregnancy childbirth 2010;10:68.
  • 26
    Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Haslam RR, Robinson JS. Elective birth at 37 weeks of gestation versus standard care for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy at term: the twins timing of birth randomised trial. BJOG 2012;119:96473.
  • 27
    Egarter C, Kofler E, Fitz R, Husslein P. Is induction of labor indicated in prolonged pregnancy? Results of a prospective randomised trial Gynecol Obstet Invest 1989;27:69.
  • 28
    Amano K, Saito K, Shoda T, Tani A, Yoshihara H, Nishijima M. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation: a prospective randomized trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 1999;25:337.
  • 29
    Augensen K, Bergsjo P, Eikeland T, Askvik K, Carlsen J. Randomised comparison of early versus late induction of labour in post-term pregnancy. Br Med (Clin Res Ed) 1987;294:11925.
  • 30
    Bergsjo P, Gui-dan H, Su-qin Y, Zhi-zeng G, Bakketeig LS. Comparison of induced versus non-induced labor in post-term pregnancy. A randomized prospective study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1989;68:6837.
  • 31
    Cardozo L, Fysh J, Pearce JM. Prolonged pregnancy: the management debate. BMJ 1986;293:105963.
  • 32
    Chanrachakul B, Herabutya Y. Postterm with favorable cervix: is induction necessary? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;106:1547.
  • 33
    Cole RA, Howie PW, Macnaughton MC. Elective induction of labour. A randomised prospective trial. Lancet 1975;1:76770.
  • 34
    Dyson DC, Miller PD, Armstrong MA. Management of prolonged pregnancy: induction of labor versus antepartum fetal testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:92834.
  • 35
    Gelisen O, Caliskan E, Dilbaz S, Ozdas E, Dilbaz B, Ozdas E, et al. Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005;120:1649.
  • 36
    Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hellmann J, Hewson S, Milner R, Willan A. Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. The Canadian multicenter post-term pregnancy trial group. N Engl J Med 1992;326:158792.
  • 37
    Heden L, Ingemarsson I, Ahlstrom H, Solum T. Induction of labor versus conservative management in prolonged pregnancy: controlled study. International Journal of Feto-Maternal Medicine 1991;4:2316.
  • 38
    Heimstad R, Skogvoll E, Mattsson L-A, Johansen OJ, Eik-Nes SH, Salvesen KA. Induction of labor or serial antenatal fetal monitoring in postterm pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:60917.
  • 39
    Henry GR. A controlled trial of surgical induction of labour and amnioscopy in the management of prolonged pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1969;76:7958.
  • 40
    Herabutya Y, Prasertsawat PO, Tongyai T, Isarangura Na Ayudthya N. Prolonged pregnancy: the management dilemma. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1992;37:2538.
  • 41
    James C, George SS, Gaunekar N, Seshadri L. Management of prolonged pregnancy: a randomized trial of induction of labour and antepartum foetal monitoring. Natl Med J India 2001;14:2703.
  • 42
    Katz Z, Yemini M, Lancet M, Mogilner BM, Ben-Hur H, Caspi B. Non-aggressive management of post-date pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1983;15:719.
  • 43
    Martin DH, Thompson W, Pinkerton JH, Watson JD. A randomized controlled trial of selective planned delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1978;85:10913.
  • 44
    Martin JNJr, Sessums JK, Howard P, Martin RW, Morrison JC. Alternative approaches to the management of gravidas with prolonged-postterm-postdate pregnancies. J Miss State Med Assoc 1989;30:10511.
  • 45
    McNellis D, Medearis AL, Fowler S, Romero R, Sibai BM, Caritis SN, et al. A clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in postterm pregnancy: the national institute of child health and human development network of maternal-fetal medicine units. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:71623.
  • 46
    Nielsen PE, Howard BC, Hill CC, Larson PL, Holland RH, Smith PN. Comparison of elective induction of labor with favorable Bishop scores versus expectant management: a randomized clinical trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005;18:5964.
  • 47
    Ohel G, Rahav D, Rothbart H, Ruach M. Randomised trial of outpatient induction of labor with vaginal PGE2 at 40-41 weeks of gestation versus expectant management. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1996;258:10912.
  • 48
    Roach VJ, Rogers MS. Pregnancy outcome beyond 41 weeks gestation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997;59:1924.
  • 49
    Sande HA, Tuveng J, Fonstelien T. A prospective randomized study of induction of labor. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1983;21:3336.
  • 50
    Tylleskar J, Finnstrom O, Leijon I. Spontaneous labor and elective induction - a prospective randomized study. I. Effects on mother and fetus. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1979;58:5138.
  • 51
    Witter FR, Weitz CM. A randomized trial of induction at 42 weeks gestation versus expectant management for postdates pregnancies. Am J Perinatol 1987;4:20611.
  • 52
    Gonen O, Rosen DJD, Dolfin Z, Tepper R, Markov S, Fejgin MD. Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: a randomized study. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:9137.
  • 53
    Kjos SL, Henry OA, Montoro M, Buchanan TA, Mestman JH. Insulin-requiring diabetes in pregnancy: a randomized trial of active induction of labor and expectant management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:6115.
  • 54
    Ek S, Andersson A, Johansson A, Kublicas M. Oligohydramnios in uncomplicated pregnancies beyond 40 completed weeks. A prospective, randomised, pilot study on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Fetal Diagn Ther 2005;20:1825.
  • 55
    Suzuki S, Otsubo Y, Sawa R, Yoneyama Y, Araki T. Clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in twin pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2000;49:247.
  • 56
    Boers KE, Vijgen SM, Bijlenga D, van der Post JA, Bekedam DJ, Kwee A, et al. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT). BMJ 2010;341:c7087.
  • 57
    van den Hove MM, Willekes C, Roumen FJ, Scherjon SA. Intrauterine growth restriction at term: induction or spontaneous labour? Disproportionate intrauterine growth intervention trial at term (DIGITAT): a pilot study Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006;125:548.
  • 58
    Koopmans CM, Bijlenga D, Groen H, Vijgen SM, Aarnoudse JG, Bekedam DJ, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;374:97988.
  • 59
    Nicholson JM, Parry S, Caughey AB, Rosen S, Keen A, Macones GA. The impact of the active management of risk in pregnancy at term on birth outcomes: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:5115.
  • 60
    Cheng YW, Kaimal AJ, Snowden JM, Nicholson JM, Caughey AB. Induction of labor compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207:5028.
  • 61
    Stock SJ, Ferguson E, Duffy A, Ford I, Chalmers J, Norman JE. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study. BMJ 2012;344:e2838.
  • 62
    Goeree R, Hannah M, Hewson S. Cost-effectiveness of induction of labour versus serial antenatal monitoring in the Canadian multicentre postterm pregnancy trial. CMAJ 1995;152:144550.
  • 63
    Vijgen SM, Koopmans CM, Opmeer BC, Groen H, Bijlenga D, Aarnoudse JG, et al. An economic analysis of induction of labour and expectant monitoring in women with gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia at term (HYPITAT trial). BJOG 2010;117:157785.
  • 64
    Alfirevic Z, Kelly AJ, Dowswell T. Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 2009;(4):CD003246.
  • 65
    Menticoglou SM, Hall PF. Routine induction of labour at 41 weeks gestation: nonsensus consensus. BJOG 2002;109:48591.
  • 66
    Melamed N, Yogev Y, Meizner I, Mashiach R, Ben-Haroush A. Sonographic prediction of fetal macrosomia: the consequences of false diagnosis. J Ultrasound Med 2010;29:22530.
  • 67
    Naylor CD, Sermer M, Chen E, Sykora K. Cesarean delivery in relation to birth weight and gestational glucose tolerance: pathophysiology or practice style? Toronto trihospital gestational diabetes investigators JAMA 1996;275:116570.
  • 68
    Ioannidis JPA. Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Med 2005;2:0696701.
  • 69
    Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 1964;24:2668.
  • 70
    Laughon SK, Zhang J, Troendle J, Sun L, Reddy UM. Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:80511.
  • 71
    Smith GC, Celik E, To M, Khouri O, Nicolaides KH, Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening Group. Cervical length at mid-pregnancy and the risk of primary cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2008;358:134653.
  • 72
    Chaillet N, Dumont A. Evidence-based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: a meta-analysis. Birth 2007;34:5364.