Meeting the challenge of maternal choice in mode of delivery with vaginal birth after caesarean section: a medical, legal and ethical commentary
Version of Record online: 20 AUG 2013
© 2013 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Special Issue: Management of pregnancy after caesarean section
Volume 121, Issue 2, pages 133–140, January 2014
How to Cite
Meeting the challenge of maternal choice in mode of delivery with vaginal birth after caesarean section: a medical, legal and ethical commentary. BJOG 2014;121:133–140., , .
- Issue online: 26 DEC 2013
- Version of Record online: 20 AUG 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 21 JUN 2013
- 1National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Clinical Guideline 132: Caesarean Section. London: RCOG, 2011.
- 2RCOG. Green-Top Guideline 45: Birth after previous Caesarean Birth. London: RCOG, 2007.
- 3National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Quality standard 15: quality standard for patient experience in adult NHS services. London: NICE, 2012 [http://guidance.nice.org.uk/QS15]. Accessed 1 March 2013.
- 4Department of Health. NHS Constitution. London: Department of Health, 2013.
- 5Office for Economic Cooperation and Development. Health at a glance 2011 [www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/health_glance-2011-en/04/09/index.html?itemId=/content/chapter/health_glance-2011-37-en]. Accessed 14 April 2013.
- 9Balancing risk and choice in childbirth after caesarean section. Br J Midwif 2010;18:638–43., .
- 11Ethical Committee Guideline 1: Law and ethics in relation to court-authorised obstetric intervention. London: RCOG, 2006.
- 12Medical Law and Ethics, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012..
- 13General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. Manchester: GMC, 2013.
- 14National Midwifery Council.Code of Conduct. London: NMC, 2008.
- 15Flaxman Partners on behalf of Royal College of Midwives and National Midwifery Council. The Feasibility and Insurability of Independent Midwifery in England. London: NMC, 2011.
- 16Ternovszky v Hungary. Application no. 67545/09, Judgement 14 December 2010.
- 17Re E (Medical Treatment Anorexia)  EWHC 1639 (COP).
- 18L (Patient: Non Consensual Treatment) 2 FLR 837;  1 FCR 609; (1997) 35 BMLR 44;  Fam. Law 325.
- 19Rochdale Healthcare NHS Trust v C  1FCR 274.
- 20Bolton Hospitals NHS Trust v O  EWHC 2871 (Fam);  1 FLR 824.