SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Clinical Guideline 132: Caesarean Section. London: RCOG, 2011.
  • 2
    RCOG. Green-Top Guideline 45: Birth after previous Caesarean Birth. London: RCOG, 2007.
  • 3
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Quality standard 15: quality standard for patient experience in adult NHS services. London: NICE, 2012 [http://guidance.nice.org.uk/QS15]. Accessed 1 March 2013.
  • 4
    Department of Health. NHS Constitution. London: Department of Health, 2013.
  • 5
    Office for Economic Cooperation and Development. Health at a glance 2011 [www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/health_glance-2011-en/04/09/index.html?itemId=/content/chapter/health_glance-2011-37-en]. Accessed 14 April 2013.
  • 6
    Lundgren I, Begley C, Gross MM, Bondas T. ‘Groping through the fog’: a metasynthesis of women's experiences on VBAC (Vaginal birth after Caesarean section). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012;12:8595.
  • 7
    Dahlen HG, Homer CS. Motherbirth or childbirth'? A prospective analysis of vaginal birth after caesarean blogs. Midwifery 2013;29:16773.
  • 8
    Meddings F, Phipps FM, Haith-Cooper M, Haigh J. Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): exploring women's perceptions. J Clin Nurs 2007;16:1607.
  • 9
    Baxter L, Davies S. Balancing risk and choice in childbirth after caesarean section. Br J Midwif 2010;18:63843.
  • 10
    Hall WA, Tomkinson J, Tomkinson MCK. Canadian care providers' and pregnant women's approaches to managing birth: minimizing risk while maximizing integrity. Qual Health Res 2012;22:57586.
  • 11
    Ethical Committee Guideline 1: Law and ethics in relation to court-authorised obstetric intervention. London: RCOG, 2006.
  • 12
    Herring J. Medical Law and Ethics, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
  • 13
    General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. Manchester: GMC, 2013.
  • 14
    National Midwifery Council.Code of Conduct. London: NMC, 2008.
  • 15
    Flaxman Partners on behalf of Royal College of Midwives and National Midwifery Council. The Feasibility and Insurability of Independent Midwifery in England. London: NMC, 2011.
  • 16
    Ternovszky v Hungary. Application no. 67545/09, Judgement 14 December 2010.
  • 17
    Re E (Medical Treatment Anorexia) [2012] EWHC 1639 (COP).
  • 18
    L (Patient: Non Consensual Treatment) 2 FLR 837; [1997] 1 FCR 609; (1997) 35 BMLR 44; [1997] Fam. Law 325.
  • 19
    Rochdale Healthcare NHS Trust v C [1997] 1FCR 274.
  • 20
    Bolton Hospitals NHS Trust v O [2002] EWHC 2871 (Fam); [2003] 1 FLR 824.