The impact of pelvic floor surgery on female sexual function: a mixed quantitative and qualitative study
Article first published online: 10 SEP 2013
© 2013 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 121, Issue 1, pages 92–101, January 2014
How to Cite
The impact of pelvic floor surgery on female sexual function: a mixed quantitative and qualitative study. BJOG 2014;121:92–101., , , , .
- Issue published online: 20 DEC 2013
- Article first published online: 10 SEP 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 3 MAY 2013
- Mayday Childbirth Charity Fund
- Female sexual function;
- pelvic floor surgery;
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ);
- qualitative research
To assess whether the current condition-specific sexual function questionnaire provides full insight into sexual function following pelvic floor surgery.
Prospective, mixed quantitative and qualitative study.
Urogynaecology clinic in a large university hospital.
Thirty-seven women undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and/or stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Women were seen before surgery and 3 months postoperatively. At both visits the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ) was completed and a qualitative face-to-face semi-structured interview was conducted. PISQ total and domain scores, as well as the change in the preoperative and postoperative score, were calculated and analysed using Wilcoxon signed rank test and one-sample t-test. The qualitative data were systematically analysed using data-matrices.
Main outcome measures
The impact of pelvic floor surgery on female sexual function.
Significant improvement was seen for PISQ total score (P = 0.003) as well as Physical (P < 0.001) and Partner-related (P = 0.002) domains, but not for the Behavioural/Emotive domain (P = 0.220). Analysis of qualitative data showed that improvement in sexual function was a result of cure of POP and SUI symptoms. Deterioration of sexual function was due to dyspareunia, fear of causing damage to the surgical result, new symptoms and a disappointing result of surgery.
Our qualitative data show that PISQ is limited in the assessment of sexual function after pelvic floor surgery as it does not assess most surgery-specific negative effects on sexual function.