SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Fritel X, Fauconnier A. Does the SWEPOP (Swedish Pregnancy, Obesity and Pelvic Floor) study suffer from a selection bias? BJOG 2013;120:15789.
  • 2
    Milsom I, Altman D, Cartwright R, Lapitan MC, Nelson R, Sillén U, et al. Epidemiology of urinary incontinence (UI) and other lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and anal incontinence (AI). In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Koury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence. Paris: Health Care Publications Ltd; 2013. pp. 15107.
  • 3
    Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, Milsom I. The prevalence of urinary incontinence 20 years after child birth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. BJOG 2013;120:14451.
  • 4
    Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, Milsom I. A comparison of the long-term consequences of vaginal delivery versus caesarean section on the prevalence, severity and bothersomeness of urinary incontinence subtypes: a national cohort study in primiparous women. BJOG 2013;120:105160.
  • 5
    Nielsen TF, Hökegård KH, Moldin PG. X-ray pelvimetry and trial of labour after previous caesarean section. A prospective study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1985;64:48590.