SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Huertas E, Guise JM, Horey D. Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochran Database Syst Rev 2009;4:CD004224.
  • 2
    Crowther CA, Dodd JM, Hiller JE, Haslam RR, Robinson JS. on behalf of the birth after cesarean study group. Planned vaginal birth or elective repeat caesaren: patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomized trial. PLoS Medicine 2012;9:110.
  • 3
    Haas A. Homebirth after cesarean: The myth and the reality. Midwifery Today 2008;86:115.
  • 4
    Fineberg AE, Tilton ZA. VBAC in the trenches. A community perspective. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2012;55:9971004.
  • 5
    MacDorman MF, Declercq E, Mathews TJ, Stotland N. Trends and characteristics of home birth after cesarean delivery in the United States and selected states. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:73744.
  • 6
    Smith A. Can vaginal birth after cesarean be justified? BJOG 2010;117:14267.
  • 7
    Korst LM, Gregory FD, Fridman M, Phelan JP. Nonclinical factors affecting women's access to trial of labor after cesarean delivery. Clin Perinatol 2011;38:193216.
  • 8
    Socol ML. Trial of labor versus elective repeat cesarean: An administrator's perspective. Semin Perinatol 2010;34:3113.
  • 9
    Birnbach DJ, Bucklin BA, Franklin D. Impact of anesthesiologists on the incidence of vaginal birth after cesarean in the United States: Role of anesthesia availability, productivity, guidelines, and patient safety. Semin Perinatol 2010;34:31824.
  • 10
    Shilhady IR, Broussard P, Bolton LB, Friedan M, Fridman R, Aydin C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: do California hospital policies follow national guidelines? J Reprod Med 2007;52:34958.
  • 11
    Bonanno C, Clausing M, Berkowitz R. VBAC: A medicolegal perspective. Clin Perinatol 2011;38:21725.
  • 12
    Guise J-M, Eden K, Emeis C, Marshall N, Walker M, Fu R, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:126778.
  • 13
    Cunningham FG, Bangdiwala S, Brown SS, et al. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement: Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:127995.
  • 14
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean. Practice Bulletin No. 115. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:45063.
  • 15
    Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth After Previous Caesarean Birth. Greentop Guidelines No. 45. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2007.
  • 16
    Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Guidelines for Vaginal Birth After Previous Caesarean Birth. SOGC Clinical Practice Guideline, No. 155. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, 2005.
  • 17
    Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Planned Vaginal Birth after Caesarean Section (Trial of Labour) (C-Obs 38): New College Statement. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2010.
  • 18
    Scott JR. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. A common-sense approach. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:34250.
  • 19
    Landon MB. Predicting uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. Semin Perinatol 2010;34:267.
  • 20
    Maged M, Fox K, Byers BD, Mateus J, Ghulmiyah L, Blackwell S, et al. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:102933.
  • 21
    Hibbard JU, Ismail MA, Wang Y, Te C, Karrison T, Ismail MA. Failed vaginal birth after a cesarean section: how risky is it? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:136571.
  • 22
    McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA, Olshen AF. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med 1996;335:68995.
  • 23
    Hook B, Kiwi R, Amini SB, Fanaroff A, Hack M. Neonatal morbidity after elective repeat cesarean section and a trial of labor. Pediatrics 1997;100:34853.
  • 24
    Clark SL, Koonings PP, Phelan JP. Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:8992.
  • 25
    Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:122632.
  • 26
    Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:2628.
  • 27
    Keeton K, Zikmnd-Fischer BJ, Ubel PA, Fenner DE, Fagerlin A. The accuracy of predicting parity as a prerequisite for cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:2859.
  • 28
    Finer LB, Zoina MR. Unintended pregnancy in the United States: Incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception 2011;84:47886.
  • 29
    Lavin JP Jr, DiPasquale L, Crane S, Stewart J Jr. A state-wide assessment of the obstetric, anesthesia, and operative team personnel who are available to manage the labors and deliveries and to treat the complications of women who attempt vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:6114.
  • 30
    Bucklin BA, Hawkins JL, Anderson JR, Ulrich FA. Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey: twenty-year update. Anesthesiology 2005;103:64553.
  • 31
    Barger MK, Dunn JT, Bearman S, Delain M, Gates E. A survey of access to trial of labor in California hospitals in 2012. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013;13:83 [Epub ahead of print].
  • 32
    Lawrence LM, Beaglec M, Espey E, Ogburn T, Skipperb B. Diminishing availability of a trial of labor after cesarean delivery in New Mexico hospitals 1998-2012. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:2427.
  • 33
    Lauria MR, Flanagan V, Capeless E. Why VBAC in New England is still viable: The New England perinatal quality Improvement network. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2012;55:102132.
  • 34
    Hawkins JL. The anesthesiologist's role during attempted VBAC. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2012;55:100513.
  • 35
    Sakala EP, Kaye S, Murray RD, Munson LJ. Epidural analgesia: Effect on the likelihood of a successful trial of labor after cesarean section. J Reprod Med 1990;35:88690.
  • 36
    Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004;351:25819.
  • 37
    Bujold E, Blackwell SC, Gauthier RJ. Cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:1823.
  • 38
    McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, Guise JM. The benefits and risks of inducing labour in patients with a prior caesarean delivery: A systematic review. BJOG 2005;112:100715.
  • 39
    Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001;345:38.
  • 40
    Stock SJ, Ferguson E, Duffy A, Ford I, Chalmers J, Norman JE. Outcomes of induction of labour in women with previous caesarean delivery: A retrospective cohort study using a population database. PLoS ONE 2013;8:17.
  • 41
    Wing DA, Lovett K, Paul RH. Disruption of prior uterine incision following misoprostol for labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:82830.
  • 42
    Jozwiak M, Dodd JM. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;3:CD009792.
  • 43
    Smith CS, Pell JP, Pasupathy D, Dobbie R. Factors predisposing to perinatal death related to uterine rupture during attempted vaginal birth after cesarean section: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2004;329:375.
  • 44
    Cahill AG, Waterman BM, Stamilo DM, et al. Higher maximum doses of oxytocin are associated with an unacceptably high risk for uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:32, e135, e5, doi:org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.001.
  • 45
    Clark S, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, et al. Reducing obstetric litigation through alterations in practice patterns. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:127983.
  • 46
    Scott JR. Avoiding labor problems during vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1997;40:53341.
  • 47
    Stalnaker BL, Maher JE, Kleinman GE, Macksey JM, Fishman LA, Bernard JM. Characteristics of successful claims for payment by the Florida Neurologic Injury Compensation Association Fund. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:26871.
  • 48
    Persadie RJ, McDonagh RJ. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: Clinical and legal perspectives. J Obstet Gynecol Can 2003;25:84652.
  • 49
    Varner M. Cesarean scar imaging and prediction of subsequent obstetric complications. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2012;55:53341.
  • 50
    Mazzoni A, Althabe F, Liu NH, Bonotti AM, Gibbons L, Sanchez AJ, et al. Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and met-analysis of observational studies. BJOG 2011;118:3919.
  • 51
    Chazotte C, Cohen WR. Catastrophic complications of previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:73842.
  • 52
    Flamm BL, Goings JR, Liu Y, Wolde-Tsadik G. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:92732.
  • 53
    Leung AS, Leung EK, Paul RH. Uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery: maternal and fetal consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:94550.
  • 54
    Bujold E, Gauthier RJ. Neonatal morbidity associated with uterine rupture: what are the risk factors? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;18:6.
  • 55
    Martinez-Biarge M, Garcia-Alix A, Garcia-Benasach F, et al. Neonatal neurological morbidity associated with uterine rupture. J Perinat Med 2008;35:53542.
  • 56
    Holmgren C, Scott JR, Porter TF, Esplin MS, Bardsley T. Uterine rupture with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Decision-to-delivery time and neonatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:72531.
  • 57
    Scott JR. Mandatory trial of labor after cesarean delivery: An alternative viewpoint. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:8114.
  • 58
    Ridgeway JJ, Weyrich DL, Benedetti TJ. Fetal heart rate changes associated with uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:50612.