• 1
    Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division UN. World Contraceptive Use 2007. []. Accessed 27 May 2013.
  • 2
    Song XJ, Peng L, Zhang KN, Wu SC, Zhou N, Zhou H. The analysis on status of IUD related service technology. Chin J Fam Plann 2010;18:58.
  • 3
    UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank, Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction: IUD Research Group. A randomized multicentre trial of the Multiload 375 and TCu380A IUDs in parous women: three-year results. Contraception 1994;49:5439.
  • 4
    World Health Organization. Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction: Task Force on the Safety and Efficacy of Fertility Regulating Methods. The TCu380A, TCu220C, multiload 250 and Nova T IUDS at 3,5 and 7 years of use–results from three randomized multicentre trials. Contraception 1990;42:14158.
  • 5
    Long-term reversible contraception. Twelve years of experience with the TCu380A and TCu220C. Contraception 1997;56:34152.
  • 6
    Kulier R, O'Brien PA, Helmerhorst FM, Usher-Patel M, D'Arcangues C. Copper containing, framed intra-uterine devices for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007:CD005347.
  • 7
    Petta CA, Faundes D, Pimentel E, Diaz J, Bahamondes L. The use of vaginal ultrasound to identify copper T IUDs at high risk of expulsion. Contraception 1996;54:2879.
  • 8
    He JL, LV XY, Zeng WM, You PM, Su YH, Huang MF, et al. The effects of IUD position in uterine scanned by ultrasound immediately after insertion. Chin J Fam Plann 1999;4:15861.
  • 9
    Wu SC, Li L, Zou Y, Dong J, Lei ZW. Clinical efect comparison of seven types of IUDs placement during intermenstruum. Chin J Fam Plann 2008;16:5526.
  • 10
    Jia XJ, Zhang KN, Wu SC. A nested case-control study on IUD's removal due to downward dislocation about quality of care for women in rural areas in Yunnan Province. Reprod Contracept 2010;30:3904.
  • 11
    Castro A, Abarca L, Rios M. The clinical performance of the Multiload IUD. II. The influence of age. Adv Contracept 1993;9:2918.
  • 12
    Zhang J, Feldblum PJ, Chi IC, Farr MG. Risk factors for copper T IUD expulsion: an epidemiologic analysis. Contraception 1992;46:42733.
  • 13
    Harrison-Woolrych M, Ashton J, Coulter D. Insertion of the Multiload Cu375 intrauterine device; experience in over 16,000 New Zealand women. Contraception 2002;66:38791.
  • 14
    Kivijarvi A, Gronroos M. Positional factors of the uterus play a contributing part in IUD failure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1983;62:6770.
  • 15
    Chi IC, Farr G, Dominik R, Robinson N. Do retroverted uteri adversely affect insertions and performance of IUDs? Contraception 1990;41:495506.
  • 16
    Castro A, Abarca L, Rios M. The clinical performance of the Multiload IUD. I. The influence of the endometrial cavity length. Adv Contracept 1993;9:28590.
  • 17
    Petersen KR, Brooks L, Jacobsen N, Skoby SO. Clinical performance of intrauterine devices in nulligravidae: is the length of the endometrial cavity of significance? Acta Eur Fertil 1991;22:2258.
  • 18
    Bahamondes MV, Monteiro I, Canteiro R, Fernandes AS, Bahamondes L. Length of the endometrial cavity and intrauterine contraceptive device expulsion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011;113:503.
  • 19
    Yu X, Wan QZ, Zhang XJ, Du JM. Analysis of uterine measurement of 5404 women of normal IUD by ultrasonography. Chin J Fam Plann 1996;26:33740.
  • 20
    Yang TZ, Luo T, Yang YL. Uterine measurement among women at reproductive age in Sichuan province. J Huaxi Med Univ 2001;32:62930.
  • 21
    Hasson HM, Dershin H. Assessment of uterine shape by geometric means. Contracept Deliv Syst 1981;2:5975.
  • 22
    Gan SX, Ma QX, Jin H. Different uterine cavity Morphings and IUD selection. Henan Med Res 1977;6:623.
  • 23
    Lu H, Ying WW, Huang LL, Zhou YM, Sun HL, Shao LF. Observation on endometrial cavity shape by three-dimensional ultrasonography. Chin J Ultrasonogr 2005;14:335.