A personalised eHealth programme reduces the duration until return to work after gynaecological surgery: results of a multicentre randomised trial
Article first published online: 11 FEB 2014
© 2014 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 121, Issue 9, pages 1127–1136, August 2014
How to Cite
A personalised eHealth programme reduces the duration until return to work after gynaecological surgery: results of a multicentre randomised trial. BJOG 2014;121:1127–1136., , , , , , , .
- Issue published online: 22 JUL 2014
- Article first published online: 11 FEB 2014
- Manuscript Accepted: 10 NOV 2013
- ZonMw. Grant Number: 150020037
- VU University Medical Centre
- eHealth intervention;
- gynaecological surgery;
- laparoscopic adnexal surgery;
- return to work
To evaluate the effectiveness of an eHealth intervention on recovery and return to work, after gynaecological surgery.
Randomised multicentre trial that ran from March 2010 until September 2011.
Secondary care in seven general and university hospitals in the Netherlands.
A cohort of 215 women (aged 18–65 years) who had a hysterectomy and/or laparoscopic adnexal surgery for a benign indication.
The women were randomly assigned to the intervention group (n = 110) or the control group (n = 105). The intervention group received an eHealth programme that provided personalised tailor-made pre- and postoperative instructions on the resumption of daily activities, including work, and tools to improve self-empowerment and to identify recovery problems. The control group was provided with access to a control website.
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome was the duration of sick leave until a full sustainable return to work. Secondary outcome measures were quality of life, general recovery, and pain intensity.
In intention-to-treat analysis the eHealth intervention was effective on time to return to work (hazard ratio 1.43; 95% confidence interval 1.003–2.040; P = 0.048). The median duration of sick leave until a full sustainable return to work was 39 days (interquartile range 20–67 days) in the intervention group and 48 days (interquartile range 21–69 days) in the control group. After 26 weeks pain intensity was lower (visual analogue scale, cumulative odds ratio 1.84; 95% confidence interval 1.04–3.25; P = 0.035) and quality of life was higher (Rand-36 health survey, between-group difference 30, 95% confidence interval 4–57; P = 0.024) in the intervention group, compared with the control group.
The use of the eHealth intervention by women after gynaecological surgery results in a faster return to work, with a higher quality of life and less pain.