SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Rob L, Skapa P, Robova H. Fertility-sparing surgery in patients with cervical cancer. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:192200.
  • 2
    Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR, Dusek L, Slama J, Zikán M, Zaal A, et al. Bilateral ultrastaging of sentinel lymph node in cervical cancer: lowering the false-negative rate and improving the detection of micrometastasis. Gynecol Oncol 2012;127:4626.
  • 3
    Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR, Dusek L, Zikán M, Zaal A, Sevcik L, et al. Prognostic significance of low volume sentinel lymph node disease in early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2012;124:496501.
  • 4
    Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, Placa F, Milani R, Perego P, et al. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet 1997;350:53540.
  • 5
    Lim KC, Howells RE, Evans AS. The role of clinical follow up in early stage cervical cancer in South Wales. BJOG 2004;111:14448.
  • 6
    Bodurka-Bevers D, Morris M, Eifel PJ, Levenback C, Bevers MW, Lucas KR, et al. Posttherapy surveillance of women with cervical cancer: an outcomes analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2000;78:18793.
  • 7
    Bergmark K, Avall-Lundqvist E, Dickman PW, Henningsohn L, Steineck G. Vaginal changes and sexuality in women with a history of cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 1999;340:13839.
  • 8
    Bergmark K, Avall-Lundqvist E, Dickman PW, Henningsohn L, Steineck G. Lymphedema and bladder-emptying difficulties after radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer and among population controls. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006;16:11309.
  • 9
    Malur S, Possover M, Schneider A. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal versus radical abdominal hysterectomy type II in patients with cervical cancer. Surg Endosc 2001;15:28992.
  • 10
    Abu-Rustum NR, Gemignani ML, Moore K, Sonoda Y, Venkatraman E, Brown C, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy using the argon-beam coagulator: pilot data and comparison to laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2003;91:4029.
  • 11
    Mirhashemi R, Averette HE, Deepika K, Estape R, Angioli R, Martin J, et al. The impact of intraoperative autologous blood transfusion during type III radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:13105.
  • 12
    Magrina JF, Goodrich MA, Weaver AL, Podratz KC. Modified radical hysterectomy: morbidity and mortality. Gynecol Oncol 1995;59:27782.
  • 13
    Artman LE, Hoskins WJ, Bibro MC, Heller PB, Weiser EB, Barnhill DR, et al. Radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage IB carcinoma of the cervix: 21 years experience. Gynecol Oncol 1987;28:813.
  • 14
    Mabrouk M, Frumovitz M, Greer M, Sharma S, Schmeler KM, Soliman PT, et al. Trends in laparoscopic and robotic surgery among gynecologic oncologists: a survey update. Gynecol Oncol 2009;112:5015.
  • 15
    Schreuder HW, Zweemer RP, van Baal WM, van de Lande J, Dijkstra JC, Verheijen RH. From open radical hysterectomy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: aspects of a single institution learning curve. Gynecol Surg 2010;7:2538.
  • 16
    Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN, et al. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:357.e17.
  • 17
    Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, Montero RP, Magtibay PM. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2008;109:8691.
  • 18
    Verheijen R, Zweemer R. Robotic surgery for gynaecologic cancer: an overview. Curr Oncol Rep 2012;14:5449.
  • 19
    Nezhat F. Minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: laparoscopy versus robotics. Gynecol Oncol 2008;111(2 Suppl):S2932.
  • 20
    Cho JE, Nezhat FR. Robotics and gynecologic oncology: review of the literature. J Minim Invas Gynecol 2009;16:66981.
  • 21
    Tinelli R, Malzoni M, Cosentino F, Perone C, Fusco A, Cicinelli E, et al. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18:26228.
  • 22
    European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Chemotherapy followed by surgery versus radiotherapy plus chemotherapy in patients with stage IB or II cervical cancer. [http://clinicaltrials.gov] on 20 July 2013, under identifier NCT00039338. Alternative study ID: EORTC-55994. Accessed 12 March 2012.
  • 23
    Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN, et al. A comparative study of three surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:360.e19.
  • 24
    Hoogendam JP, Hobbelink MG, Veldhuis WB, Verheijen RH, van Diest PJ, Zweemer RP. Preoperative sentinel node mapping with (99 m)Tc-nanocolloid SPECT-CT significantly reduces the intraoperative sentinel node retrieval time in robot-assisted laparoscopic cervical cancer surgery. Gynecol Oncol 2013;129:38994.
  • 25
    Querleu D, Morrow CP. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol 2008;9:297303.
  • 26
    Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Published 14 June 2010. [http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_5x7.pdf]. Accessed 1 June 2013.
  • 27
    Dutch cancer registry, maintained by the ‘Integraal Kankercentrum Nederland (IKNL)’ (Integral Cancer-Centers of the Netherlands). Disease specific cervical cancer survival subdivided by stage. [http://www.cijfersoverkanker.nl]. Accessed 26 August 2013.
  • 28
    International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). 26th annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006;95(suppl 1):S43104.
  • 29
    van de Lande J, von Mensdorff-Pouilly S, Lettinga RG, Piek JM, Verheijen RH. Open versus laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer: no difference in surgical or disease outcome. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2012;22:10714.
  • 30
    Obermair A, Gebski V, Frumovitz M, Soliman PT, Schmeler KM, Levenback C, et al. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer. J Minim Invas Gynecol 2008;15:5848.
  • 31
    Cantrell LA, Mendivil A, Gehrig PA, Boggess JF. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience. Gynecol Oncol 2010;117:2605.
  • 32
    Sert MB, Abeler V. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: comparison with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy; one surgeon's experience at the Norwegian Radium Hospital. Gynecol Oncol 2011;121:6004.
  • 33
    Narducci F, Collinet P, Merlot B, Lambaudie E, Boulanger L, Lefebvre-Kuntz D, et al. Benefit of robot-assisted laparoscopy in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: urinary morbidity in early cervical cancer. Surg Endosc 2013;27:123742.
  • 34
    Nezhat FR, Datta MS, Liu C, Chuang L, Zakashansky K. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. JSLS 2008;12:22737.
  • 35
    Kruijdenberg CB, van den Einden LC, Hendriks JC, Zusterzeel PL, Bekkers RL. Robot-assisted versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer, a review. Gynecol Oncol 2011;120:3349.