SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Humphrey T, Tucker J. Rising rates of obstetric interventions: exploring the determinants of induction of labour. J Public Health 2009;31:8894.
  • 2
    Li Z, McNally L, Hilder L, Sullivan EA. Australia's Mothers and Babies 2009. Perinatal statistics series no. 25. Cat. no. PER 52 Sydney, NSW: AIHW National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, 2011.
  • 3
    Kelly A, Alfirevic Z, Ghosh A. Outpatient versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; Art No: CD007372.
  • 4
    Scheil W, Scott J, Catcheside B, Sage L. Pregnancy Outcome in South Australia 2010. Adelaide, SA: Pregnancy Outcome Unit, SA Health, Government of South Australia; 2012.
  • 5
    South Australian Perinatal Practice Guidelines. Chapter 4 – Induction of labour techniques. Maternity Care in South Australia, May 2009. Government of South Australia.
  • 6
    Biem S, Turnell R, Olatunbosun O, Tauh M, Biem H. A randomised controlled trial of outpatient versus inpatient labour induction with vaginal controlled release prostaglandin-E2: effectiveness and satisfaction. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003;25:2331.
  • 7
    Reid M, Lorimer K, Norman J, Bollapragada S, Norrie J. The home as an appropriate setting for women undertaking cervical ripening before induction of labour. Midwifery 2011;27:305.
  • 8
    Farmer K, Schwartz W, Rayburn W, Turnbull G. A cost minimisation analysis of intrfacervical prostaglandin prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening in an outpatient versus inpatient setting. Clin Ther 1996;18:74756.
  • 9
    Adelson P, Wedlock G, Wilkinson C, Howard K, Bryce R, Turnbull D. A cost analysis of inpatient compared with outpatient prostaglandin E2 cervical priming for induction of labour: results from the OPRA Trial. Aust Health Rev 2013;37:46773.
  • 10
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Induction of Labour. NICE Clinical Guidelines 70. London: RCOG Press, 2008.
  • 11
    Dowswell T, Kelly AJ, Livio S, Norman JE, Alfirevic Z. Different methods for the induction of labor in outpatient settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010, Art. No.: CD007701.
  • 12
    Turnbull D, Adelson P, Oster C, Bryce R, Wilkinson C. Psychosocial outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of outpatient cervical priming for induction of labor. Birth 2013;40:7580.
  • 13
    Turnbull D, Adelson P, Oster C, Coffey J, Coomblas J, Bryce R, et al. The impact of outpatient priming for induction of labour on midwives' work demand, work autonomy and satisfaction. Women Birth 2013;26:20712.
  • 14
    Howard K, Turnbull D, Adelson P, Wilkinson C, Gerard K. Quantifying Women's Preferences for priming for labour induction: a discrete choice experiment. J Paediatr Child Health. 2013;49:712.
  • 15
    Royal Australian College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance Clinical Guidelines, 2nd edn. Melbourne: Royal Australian College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2006.
  • 16
    Dean AG, Sullivan KM, Soe MM. OpenEpi: Open Source Epidemiologic Statistics for Public Health, Version 2.3.1[www.OpenEpi.com 2011]. Accessed 15 December 2013.
  • 17
    Graham EM, Ruis KA, Hartman AL, Northington FJ, Fox HE. A systematic review of the role of intrapartum hypoxia-ischemia in the causation of neonatal encephalopathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:58795.
  • 18
    Hofmeyr GJ, Alfirevic Z, Kelly A, Kavanagh J, Thomas J, Neilson JP, et al. Methods of cervical ripening and labour induction in late pregnancy: generic protocol (Protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;3:111.
  • 19
    Rayburn W, Gosen R, Ramadei C, Woods R, Scott JJ. Outpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 gel in uncomplicated postdate pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:141723.
  • 20
    Oster C, Adelson PL, Wilkinson C, Turnbull D. Inpatient versus outpatient cervical priming for induction of labour: therapeutic landscapes and women's preferences. Health & Place 2011;17:37985.
  • 21
    Vaknin Z, Kurzweil Y, Sherman D. Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:41829.
  • 22
    Gardosi J. Clinical strategies for improving the detection of fetal growth restriction. Clin Perinatol 2011;38:2131.
  • 23
    Grivell RM, Wong L, Bhatia V. Regimens of fetal surveillance for impaired fetal growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; CD007113.
  • 24
    Ryan G, Oskamp M, Seaward P. Randomised trial of inpatient vs outpatient administration of prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178: 303.
  • 25
    Awartani K, Turnell R, Olatunbosun O. A prospective study of induction of labor with prostaglandin vaginal gel: ambulatory versus in-patient administration. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1999;26:1658.
  • 26
    Upadhaya NB, Childs KD, Neiger R, Caudle MR. Ambulatory cervical ripening in term pregnancy. J Reprod Med 1999;44:3636.
  • 27
    Elliott J, Clewell W, Radin T. Intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel. Safety for outpatient cervical ripening before induction of labour. J Reprod Med 1992;37:71316.
  • 28
    Smith M, Swan L, Caruthers B. Outpatient use of prostaglandin gel for ripening of the cervix and induction of labor. J Fam Pract 1990;30:6567.
  • 29
    Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Agosti M, Serati M, Uccella S, Arlant V, et al. Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomised study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:338,e1-7.
  • 30
    Jozwiak M, Rengerink K, Benthem M, van Beek E, Dijksterhuis MG, de Graaf I, et al. PROBAAT Study Group. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labor at term (PROBAAT trial): an open label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2012;378:2095103.
  • 31
    Bollapragada SS, MacKenzie F, Norrie JD, Eddama O, Petrou S, Reid M, et al. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of outpatient (at home) cervical ripening with isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) prior to induction of labour-clinical trial with analyses of efficacy and acceptability. The IMOP Study BJOG 2009;116:118595.