SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alesina, A. & Rosenthal, H. (1995). Partisan politics, divided government and the economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Anderson, C.J. (2007). The end of economic voting? Contingency dilemmas and the limits of democratic accountability. Annual Review of Political Science 10: 271296.
  • Anderson, C.J. & Pontusson, J. (2007). Workers, worries and welfare states: Social protection and job insecurity in 15 OECD countries. European Journal of Political Research 46(2): 211235.
  • Anderson, C.J. et al. (2004). Endogenous economic voting: Evidence from the 1997 British election. Electoral Studies 23(4): 683708.
  • Arceneaux, K. & Nickerson, D.W. (2009). Modeling certainty with clustered data: A comparison of methods. Political Analysis 17(2): 177190.
  • Armingeon, K. et al. (2010). Comparative political data set III, 1990–2009. Berne: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.
  • Belanger, E. & Meguid, B.M. (2008). Issue salience, issue ownership and issue-based vote choice. Electoral Studies 27(3): 477491.
  • Bender, K.A. & Sloane, P.J. (1999). Trade union membership, tenure and the level of job insecurity. Applied Economics 31(1): 123135.
  • Berntson, E., Sverke, M. & Marklund, S. (2006). Predicting perceived employability: Human capital or labour market opportunities? Human Resources Abstracts 42(1): 223244.
  • Dorussen, H. & Taylor, M. (2002). Group economic voting: A comparison of the Netherlands and Germany. In Economic voting. London: Routledge.
  • Duch, R.M. & Stevenson, R.T. (2008). The economic vote: How political and economic institutions condition election results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Duch, R.M., Palmer, H.D. & Anderson, C.J. (2000). Heterogeneity in perceptions of national economic conditions. American Journal of Political Science 44(4): 635652.
  • Estevez-Abe, M., Iversen, T. & Soskice, D.W. (2001). Social protection and the formation of skills: A reinterpretation of the welfare state. In P.A. Hall & D.W. Soskice (eds), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Evans, G. (2000). The continued significance of class voting. Annual Review of Political Science 3: 401417.
  • Evans, G. & Andersen, R. (2006). The political conditioning of economic perceptions. Journal of Politics 68(1): 194207.
  • Frieden, J.A. & Rogowski, R. (1996). The impact of the international economy on national policies: An analytical overview. In R.O. Keohane & H. Milner (eds), Internationalization and domestic politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gomez, B.T. & Wilson, J.M. (2006). Cognitive heterogeneity and economic voting: A comparative analysis of four democratic electorates. American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 127145.
  • Hellwig, T.T. (2001). Interdependence, government constraints and economic voting. Journal of Politics 63(4): 11411162.
    Direct Link:
  • Hibbs, D.A. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review 71(4): 14671487.
  • Hibbs, D.A., Rivers, R.D. & Vasilatos, N. (1982). The dynamics of political support for American Presidents among occupational and partisan groups. American Journal of Political Science 26(2): 312332.
  • Hox, J.J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Iversen, T. & Cusack, T.R. (2000). The causes of welfare state expansion: Deindustrialization or globalization? World Politics 52(3): 313349.
  • Iversen, T. & Soskice, D. (2001). An asset theory of social policy preferences. American Political Science Review 95(4): 875893.
  • Iyengar, S. & Kinder, D.R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Iyengar, S. & Simon, A.F. (2000). New perspectives and evidence on political communication and campaign effects. Annual Review of Psychology 51(1): 149169.
  • Kayser, M.A. & Wlezien, C. (2011). Performance pressure: Patterns of partisanship and the economic vote. European Journal of Political Research 50(3): 365394.
  • Kinder, D.R. & Kiewiet, D.R. (1981). Sociotropic politics: The American case. British Journal of Political Science 11(2): 129161.
  • Krosnick, J.A. (1988). The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: A study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluations and voting behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55(2): 196210.
  • Krosnick, J.A., Visser, P.S. & Harder, J. (2010). The psychological underpinnings of political behavior. In S.T. Fiske et al. (eds), Handbook of social psychology, 5th edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Lavine, H., Borgida, E. & Sullivan, J.L. (2000). On the relationship between attitude involvement and attitude accessibility: Toward a cognitive-motivational model of political information processing. Political Psychology 21(1): 81106.
  • Lavine, H. et al. (1996). The relationship of national and personal issue salience to attitude accessibility on foreign and domestic policy issues. Political Psychology 17(2): 293316.
  • Lewis-Beck, M.S. & Nadeau, R. (2011). Economic voting theory: Testing new dimensions. Electoral Studies 30(2): 288294.
  • Lewis-Beck, M.S. & Paldam, M. (2000). Economic voting: An introduction. Electoral Studies 19(2): 113121.
  • Mayda, A.M. & Rodrik, D. (2005). Why are some people (and countries) more protectionist than others? European Economic Review 49(6): 13931430.
  • McAvoy, G. (2006). Stability and change: the time varying impact of economic and foreign policy evaluations on presidential approval. Political Research Quarterly 59(1): 7183.
  • McCombs, M.E. & Shaw, D.L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36(2): 176187.
  • McGraw, K.M., Lodge, M. & Stroh, P. (1990). On-line processing in candidate evaluation: The effects of issue order, issue importance and sophistication. Political Behavior 12(1): 4158.
  • Nadeau, R., Foucault, M. & Lewis-Beck, M.S. (2011). Assets and risk: A neglected dimension of economic voting. French Politics 9(2): 97119.
  • Näswall, K. & De Witte, H. (2003). Who feels insecure in Europe? Predicting job insecurity from background variables. Economic and Industrial Democracy 24(2): 189215.
  • Pacek, A.C. & Radcliff, B. (1995). Economic voting and the welfare state: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Politics 57(1): 4461.
  • Rabinowitz, G., Prothro, J.W. & Jacoby, W. (1982). Salience as a factor in the impact of issues on candidate evaluation. Journal of Politics 44(1): 4163.
  • Rehm, P. (2009). Risks and redistribution: An individual-level analysis. Comparative Political Studies 42(7): 855881.
  • Rehm, P. (2011a). Social policy by popular demand. World Politics 63(2): 271299.
  • Rehm, P. (2011b). Risk inequality and the polarized American electorate. British Journal of Political Science 41(2): 363387.
  • Scheve, K. & Slaughter, M.J. (2002). Economic insecurity and the globalization of production. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Simon, H.A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Singer, M.M. (2011a). Economic voting and welfare programmes: Evidence from the American states. European Journal of Political Research 50(4): 479503.
  • Singer, M.M. (2011b). When do voters actually think ‘It's the economy'? Evidence from the 2008 presidential campaign. Electoral Studies 30(4): 621632.
  • Singer, M.M. (2011c). Who says ‘It's the economy'? Cross-national and cross-individual variation in the salience of economic performance. Comparative Political Studies 44(3): 284312.
  • Singer, M.M. (2013). What goes around comes around: Perceived vulnerable employment and economic voting in developing countries. European Journal of Political Research 52(2): 143163.
  • Stokes, D.E. (1963). Spatial models of party competition. American Political Science Review 57(2): 368377.
  • Van der Brug, W., Van der Eijk, C. & Franklin, M.N. (2007). The economy and the vote: Economic conditions and elections in 15 countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Weatherford, M.S. (1978). Economic conditions and electoral outcomes: Class differences in the political response to recession. American Journal of Political Science 22(4): 917938.
  • Wlezien, C. (2005). On the salience of political issues: The problem with ‘most important problem’. Electoral Studies 24(4): 555579.