SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bengtsson, A. & Mattila, M. (2009). Direct democracy and its critics: Support for direct democracy and stealth democracy in Finland. West European Politics 32(5): 10311048.
  • Council of Europe (2009). Electronic democracy: Recommendation CM/Rec(2009)1 and explanatory memorandum. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
  • Dalton, R.J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Delli Carpini, M.X., Cook, F.L. & Jacobs, L.R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science 7(1): 315344.
  • Department of Communities and Local Government (2008). Communities in control: Real people, real power. Cm7427 (London: The Stationery Office).
  • Fournier, P. et al. (2011). When citizens decide: Lessons from citizen assemblies on electoral reform (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Heath, A., Evans, G. & Martin, J. (1994). The measurement of core beliefs and values: The development of balanced socialist/laissez faire and libertarian/authoritarian scales. British Journal of Political Science 24(1): 115158.
  • Hibbing, J. & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans' beliefs about how government should work (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Kelso, A. (2010). The public good: Reforming Westminster after the expenses crisis. Political Insight 1(1): 810.
  • Mansbridge, J. et al. (2012). A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In J. Parkinson & J. Mansbridge (eds), Deliberative systems: Theories of institutional design (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • McHugh, D. (2006). Wanting to be heard but not wanting to act? Addressing political disengagement. Parliamentary Affairs 59(3): 546552.
  • Ministry of Justice (2007). The governance of Britain. Cm7170 (London: The Stationery Office).
  • Morrell, M.E. (1999). Citizens' evaluations of participatory democratic procedures: Normative theory meets empirical science. Political Research Quarterly 52(2): 293322.
  • Mutz, D.C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Neblo, M. et al. (2010). Who wants to deliberate – and why? American Political Science Review 104(3): 566583.
  • Pateman, C. (2012). Participatory democracy revisited. Perspectives on Politics 10(1): 719.
  • Sanders, D. et al. (2007). Does mode matter for modeling political choice? Evidence from the 2005 British Election Study. Political Analysis 15(3): 257285.
  • Warren, M. (2012). When, Where and Why Do We Need Deliberation, Voting and Other Means of Organizing Democracy? A Problem-based Approach to Democratic Systems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, September.