SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Achen, C.H. (2000). Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables. Political Methodology Working Paper.
  • Armingeon, K. et al. (2012). Comparative Political Data Set, 1960-2010. Berne: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.
  • Baldi, B. (1999). Beyond the federal-unitary dichotomy. Working Paper. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California.
  • Beck, N. (2001). Time-series cross-section data: What have we learned in the past few years? Annual Review of Political Science 4(1): 271293.
  • Beck, N. & Katz, J. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data in comparative politics. American Political Science Review 89(3): 634647.
  • Bochsler, D. (2010). Measuring party nationalisation: A new gini-based indicator that corrects for the number of units. Electoral Studies 29(1): 155168.
  • Bradley, D. et al. (2003). Distribution and redistribution in postindustrial democracies. World Politics 55(2): 193228.
  • Breunig, C. (2011). Reduction, stasis and expansion of budgets in advanced democracies. Comparative Political Studies 44(8): 10601088.
  • Breunig, C. & Busemeyer, M.R. (2012). Fiscal austerity and the trade-off between public investment and social spending. Journal of European Public Policy 19(6): 921938.
  • Brooks, C. & Manza, J. (2006). Social policy responsiveness in developed democracies. American Sociological Review 71(3): 474494.
  • Busemeyer, M.R. (2009). From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited. European Journal of Political Research 48(4): 455482.
  • Caramani, D. (2004). The nationalization of politics the formation of national electorates and party systems in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Caramani, D. (2005). The formation of national party systems in Europe: A comparative-historical analysis. Scandinavian Political Studies 28(4): 295322.
  • Castañeda-Angarita, N. (2013). Party system nationalization, presidential coalitions and government spending. Electoral Studies. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.03.005
  • Chang, E.C. (2008). Electoral incentives and budgetary spending: Rethinking the role of political institutions. Journal of Politics 70(4): 10861097.
  • Chhibber, P. & Kollman, K. (2004). The formation of national party systems: Federalism and party competition in Canada, Great Britain, India and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Crepaz, M.M. (2002). Global, constitutional and partisan determinants of redistribution in fifteen OECD countries. Comparative Politics 34: 169188.
  • Cutler, F. (2007). Context and attitude formation: Social interaction, default information or local interests? Political Geography 26(5): 275600.
  • Dahlberg, M. & Johansson, E. (2002). On the vote-purchasing behavior of incumbent governments. American Political Science Review 96(1): 2740.
  • Deaton, A. (1997). Analysis of household surveys. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Esteban, J., Gradín, C. & Ray, D. (2007). An extension of a measure of polarization, with an application to the income distribution of five OECD countries. Journal of Economic Inequality 5(1): 119.
  • Franzese, R.J. & Nooruddin, I. (2004). The effective constituency in (re-)distributive politics: Alternative bases of democratic representation, geographic versus partisan. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan.
  • Funk, P. & Gathmann. C. (forthcoming). How do electoral systems affect fiscal policy? Evidence from cantonal parliaments, 1890–2000. Journal of the European Economic Association.
  • Gagliarducci, S., Nannicini, T. & Naticchionia, P. (2011). Electoral rules and politicians’ behavior: A micro test. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 3(3): 144174.
  • Golder, M. (2007). Replication data for: Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946–2000. Available online: http://dvn.iq.harvard.edu/dvn/dv/mgolder
  • Grossman, G.M. & Helpman, E. (2005). A protectionist bias in majoritarian politics. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(4): 12391282.
  • Hall, P.A. & Soskice, D.W. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hicken, A., Kollman, K. & Simmons, J.W. (2010). Party system nationalization and the provision of public health services. UCLA Comparative Politics Workshop Paper. Los Angeles, CA: University of California.
  • Hicks, A.M. & Swank, D.H. (1992). Politics, institutions and welfare spending in industrialized democracies, 1960–82. American Political Science Review 86(3): 658674.
  • Hooghe, L., Marks, G. & Schakel. A.H. (2010). The rise of regional authority: A comparative study of 42 democracies (1950–2006). London: Routledge.
  • Huber, E. & Stephens, J.D. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and policies in global markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Iversen, T. & Soskice, D. (2006). Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: Why some democracies redistribute more than others. American Political Science Review 100(2): 634647.
  • Johnston, R.J. & Pattie, C.J. (2006). Putting voters in their place: Geography and elections in Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jones, M.P. & Mainwaring, S. (2003). The nationalization of parties and party systems: An empirical measure and an application to the Americas. Party Politics 9(2): 139166.
  • Kasuya, Y. & Moenius, J. (2008). The nationalization of party systems: Conceptual issues and alternative district-focused measures. Electoral Studies 27(1): 126135.
  • Katzenstein, P.J. (1985). Small states in world markets: Industrial policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Kittel, B. & Winner, H. (2005). How reliable is pooled analysis in political economy? The globalization-welfare state nexus revisited. European Journal of Political Research 44(2): 269293.
  • Kollman, K. et al. (2010). Constituency-level elections archive (CLEA). [Dataset], Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer and distributor]. Available at: www.electiondataarchive.org.
  • Korpi, W. (1978). The working class in welfare capitalism: Work, unions and politics in Sweden. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Lago, I. & Montero, J.R. (2010). The nationalisation of party systems revisited: A new measure based on parties’ entry decisions, electoral results and district magnitude. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Lago-Peñas, I. & Lago-Peñas, S. (2009). Does the nationalization of party systems affect the composition of public spending? Economics of Governance 10(1): 8598.
  • Latner, M. & McGann, A. (2005). Geographical representation under proportional representation: The cases of Israel and the Netherlands. Electoral Studies 24(4): 709734.
  • Lee, A. (1988). The persistence of difference: Electoral change in Cornwall. Paper presented at the Political Studies Association Conference, Plymouth.
  • León-Alfonso, S. (2007) The political economy of fiscal decentralization: Bringing politics to the study of intergovernmental transfers. Barcelona: Institut d'Estudis Autonòmics.
  • Lijphart, A. (1994). Electoral systems and party systems: A study of twenty-seven democracies, 1945 – 1990. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Lizzeri, A. & Persico, N. (2001). The provision of public goods under alternative electoral incentives. American Economic Review 91(1): 225239.
  • Milesi-Ferretti, G.M., Perotti, R. & Rostagno, M. (2002). Electoral systems and public spending. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(2): 609657.
  • Moene, K.O. & Wallerstein, M. (2001). Inequality, social insurance and redistribution. American Political Science Review 95(4): 859874.
  • Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49(6): 14171426.
  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2010). Social expenditure and welfare statistics. Paris: OECD.
  • Overman, H.G. & Puga, D. (2002). Unemployment clusters across Europe's regions and countries. Economic Policy 17(34): 115148.
  • Persson, T. & Tabellini, G. (2000). Political economics: Explaining economic policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Persson, T. & Tabellini, G. (2003). The economic effects of constitutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Persson, T. & Tabellini, G. (2004). Constitutional rules and fiscal policy outcomes. American Economic Review 94(1): 2545.
  • Persson, T., Roland, G. & Tabellini, G. (2007). Electoral rules and government spending in parliamentary democracies. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2(2): 155188.
  • Rickard, S. (2009). Strategic targeting: The effect of institutions and interests on distributive transfers. Comparative Political Studies 42(5): 670695.
  • Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy 106(5): 9971032.
  • Rose, R. & Urwin, D.W. (1975). Regional differentiation and political utility in Western nations. Professional Papers in Contemporary Political Sociology 06-007. London: Sage.
  • Schmidt, M.G. (1996). When parties matter: A review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy. European Journal of Political Research 30(2): 155183.
  • Stratmann, T. & Baur, M. (2002). Plurality rule, proportional representation and the German Bundestag: How incentives to pork-barrel differ across electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 506514.
  • Taagepera, R. & Shugart, M.S. (1989). Seats and votes: The effects and determinants of electoral systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Tanzi, V. (2002). Globalization and the future of social protection. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 49(1): 116127.
  • Tavits, M. (2004). The size of government in majoritarian and consensus democracies. Comparative Political Studies 37(3): 340359.
  • Tunstall, H. et al. (2000). Geographical scale, the ‘feel good’ factor and voting at the 1997 general election in England and Wales. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 25(1): 5164.
  • Weingast, B.R., Shepsle, K.A. & Johnsen, C. (1981). The political economy of benefits and costs: A neoclassical approach to distributive politics. Journal of Political Economy 89(4): 642664.