Negotiated settlements and peace referendums
Article first published online: 12 FEB 2014
© 2014 The Author. European Journal of Political Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of. European Consortium for Political Research.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
European Journal of Political Research
Volume 53, Issue 2, pages 234–249, May 2014
How to Cite
Loizides, N. (2014), Negotiated settlements and peace referendums. European Journal of Political Research, 53: 234–249. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12043
- Issue published online: 1 APR 2014
- Article first published online: 12 FEB 2014
- peace agreements;
- divided societies;
- conflict management
Institutional innovations in conflict management have received considerable academic attention in the past decades. Yet few studies have considered the design of referendums in peace processes and the role of popular mandates in catalysing negotiated settlements. Drawing evidence from divided societies, particularly the contrasting cases of South Africa and Cyprus, the article points to the importance of ratification sequence and early mandate referendums. Specifically, it demonstrates how mandate referendums focusing initially on domestic constituencies enable leaders to pre-empt ethnic outbidding challenges while concluding a peace agreement. An early ratification process could safeguard the peace process from unavoidable reversals in public opinion, increase flexibility as to the timing of critical decisions and maximise the credibility of leaders aiming for a negotiated settlement. The study of mandate referendums has important implications for broader research on international mediations since it suggests mechanisms by which political actors could ensure the ratification of significant treaties in global or regional politics.