Get access

Plan–Provider Integration, Premiums, and Quality in the Medicare Advantage Market

Authors

  • Austin B. Frakt,

    Corresponding author
    1. Health Care Financing and Economics, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
    2. Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
    3. Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA
    4. Leonard Davis Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
    • Address correspondence to Austin B. Frakt, Health Economist, Health Care Financing & Economics, VA Boston Healthcare System, Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Assistant Professor of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Adjunct Senior Fellow, Leonard Davis Institute, University of Pennsylvania, 150 S. Huntington Ave. (152H), Boston, MA 02176; e-mail: frakt@bu.edu.

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Steven D. Pizer,

    1. Health Care Financing and Economics, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
    2. Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
    3. Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Roger Feldman

    1. Health Insurance, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Objective

To investigate how integration between Medicare Advantage plans and health care providers is related to plan premiums and quality ratings.

Data Source

We used public data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Area Resource File and private data from one large insurer. Premiums and quality ratings are from 2009 CMS administrative files and some control variables are historical.

Study Design

We estimated ordinary least-squares models for premiums and plan quality ratings, with state fixed effects and firm random effects. The key independent variable was an indicator of plan–provider integration.

Data Collection

With the exception of Medigap premium data, all data were publicly available. We ascertained plan–provider integration through examination of plans’ websites and governance documents.

Principal Findings

We found that integrated plan–providers charge higher premiums, controlling for quality. Such plans also have higher quality ratings. We found no evidence that integration is associated with more generous benefits.

Conclusions

Current policy encourages plan–provider integration, although potential effects on health insurance products and markets are uncertain. Policy makers and regulators may want to closely monitor changes in premiums and quality after integration and consider whether quality improvement (if any) justifies premium increases (if they occur).

Ancillary